Editorial
Adesina’s Needless Outburst On Fuel Scarcity
Amid the growing scarcity of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) popularly dubbed petrol in the country, Femi Adesina stunned Nigerians when he said the prevailing challenges were not new, after all. The Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to President Muhammadu Buhari indicated this in his recent weekly article titled: “Knock, Knock. Who’s There”, and shared it on his official Facebook page.
Adesina, in a reaction to the fuel crisis plaguing Nigeria, declared that Nigerians encountered similar challenges before President Buhari took possession of power and went on to claim that petrol crisis had been an isochronous phenomenon in the country. According to him, Nigerians had hibernated variously at fuel stations, queuing for petrol on numerous happenstances.
Furthermore, the presidential spokesman arrogantly stated that the heavens would not fall over the current fuel dearth and Nigerians would survive like always. He, however, acknowledged that the fuel dilemma had worsened the living conditions of the Nigerian people, noting that the Buhari’s regime was working assiduously to restore normalcy.
Motorists, transporters, business owners and individuals are going through excruciating pain as fuel shortage nibbles harder in various parts of the country. The cost of transportation is increasing by geometric proportion across the nation following the upgrade in the pump price of petrol. Many PMS outlets now sell the commodity at not less than N200/litre.
Several Nigerians have strongly considered Adesina’s comment offensive. The Tide equally thinks that the presidential spokesman was insensitive and heartless to the plight of Nigerians who have been compelled to go through the existing unprecedented scarcity of the PMS induced by the importation of incredibly contaminated fuel by excessively corrupt members of the present administration headed by his principal.
Adesina should be cautioned. His loony statement indicates that the Federal Government takes Nigerians for granted and are never troubled about the squirming misery inflicted day-to-day on hapless citizens of this country by the rudderless and incompetent regime in Abuja. It is uncharitable to tell a suffering man that he is unquestionably in anguish. That was precisely what Adesina did with his inattentive utterance.
At a time when the Nigerian polity forages with unending insecurity, endemic poverty, and heightened tyrannical disregard for the rule of law, we cannot but denounce Adesina’s superfluous vituperation. One thing he must comprehend is that he will not be in that office permanently. Truly, his days are numbered; he will soon grasp the dingy condition of the common Nigerian.
Rather than burlesque Nigerians, what Adesina should busy himself with is to explain how dangerous fuel found its way into the country and advocate condign sanctions against the felons. In case he does not know, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited supervised by the President who doubles as Petroleum Minister, imported methanol laden petrol. Since then, Nigerians have brooked an erratic supply of fuel for more than a month.
One of the importing firms gutsily claimed that the NNPC substantiated the product before shipment. The question is, at what point did the fuel go bad or degraded? It is widely speculated that excessive methanol was introduced while the product was in transit. This level of corruption in the petroleum sector should engage Mr Adesina’s sense of high-mindedness, if he has any, not his unwelcome piquing preachment.
Nigerians are paying dearly for the gaffe of the NNPC Limited, which as the sole importer of petrol, attracted this mess upon the country. Its ineptitude in running four refineries aground dragooned our country to be pendent on imported petrol in the first place. It has further stoked it by opaque, fraud-prone import practices. Shamefully, Adesina’s comment clearly shrugs off this wrong act.
The NNPC has no hiding place; it is primarily to blame for this scandal, not innocent Nigerians who have been suffering the worst governance in the history of the country. So, too is the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDRA), the regulator, which like the NNPC, failed woefully to detect, isolate, and prevent the filthy consignment from entering the market.
Sadly, beyond the investigation ordered by Buhari, no one has been brought to book. By now, it is expected that the NNPC boss should have been asked to step aside, including those involved in the importation of the adulterated fuel for an unimpeded inquest. A criminal disquisition ought to be opened, while anti-graft agencies need not wait before launching a discreet inquiry.
Buhari’s media aide must realise that Nigerians did not elect the government to import bad fuel, preside over fuel shortages or power outages. Petrol-related matters were among the reasons former President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration got the ire of the citizens. Adesina is an ignominy to the journalism profession. Contemptuously, he talks from both sides of his mouth after constantly reprehending the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), particularly under Jonathan.
The job of a spokesperson is not an all-comers affair. It is a serious responsibility that gives an organisation human form. This category of persons must be trained and familiar with the basic principles of crisis and emergency risk communication. They should play a role in developing messages, so they can “own” and deliver them well. Obviously, Femi lacks those qualities. Therefore, he should invest time and energy in developing the skills of an effective spokesman.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
