Opinion

Northern Governors’ Agitation For More Derivation Funds

Published

14 years ago

March 12, 2012

As part of the desire to bring you up to date with burning issues through our Innovative Products, PUBLIC OPINION, a Free Speech template aimed at synthesising the unedited views of our esteemed readers as a feedback mechanism, debuts, today, with the public fielding opinions on the vexed proposal by the Northern Governors’ Forum for a new revenue allocation formula in favour of the North. Excerpts.

Mrs Zell Igweze,

Pharmacist

You know there are three tiers of revenue distribution: local government, state government and Federal Government. They are even getting so much. It is not judicious.

The first thing is that we have to sit down and talk about how Nigeria should go. Until we come to that, nobody should be agitating. If we sit down, we then ask what is this formula, what is this revenue? Okay oil, which are the states where we get these things. Who gives us ten or twenty barrels? These are the basis.

What are you producing? On what basis are you making local government or is it based on population? Who will get more?

You can’t base it on land mass, you can only base it on population. Who are you going to develop with your money? We are talking of individuals. If they have to give a local government N2billion, you are looking at the number of children who go to school, you are looking at the number of teachers you have to pay in the local government. Can you now give it to nama because they are grazing on the field. It should not be on land mass.

The North naturally has a lot of land mass and they are not densely populated. So let us start with census. There are so many things wrong with Nigeria. Until we sit down and decide how to do certain things as a country, because it is when we sit down, we can decide how to do certain things. Let them leave it as it is now. Because when they begin to agitate, some people will begin to be angry.

If I am from an oil producing state, I will get very angry. You know there are so many contending issues. I can’t come from here and in the North you are trying to slaughter me as a goat and you are talking about revenue formula. What are you sharing? Is it two countries, if you are asking me to go back to my state. They should take what they have there. Let’s take what we have here, to be able to cater for people who are coming back.

So, what I am saying to the northern governors is that in those days they used to say Northern Arewa because they had the military power behind them, they were having it easy. Now, although we are running a democracy that is not fully democratized, it will not work. I don’t believe in the Nigerian census. Lagos State is more populated than Kano. These are the issues. Goodluck Elebiri,

Civil Servant

For long, they have been ruling this country. All our wealth from the Niger Delta is sent to that place for their development. Now our own son is there and want to help this side to enjoy the benefits of their resources, they are now agitating for something that is not relevant.

If they want to enjoy derivation, they should also allow the government to tap from their solid mineral resources. Because to my own understanding, I believe that even this Boko Haram thing is being sponsored by most of these northern leaders so that government will not tap into their own mineral resources. Because I believe that this present government wants a situation where if they are tapping from this side we should also tap from the North. When the northerners discovered that we want to tap from their side, they began to sponsor Boko Haram, so that they will stop us from coming to tap from them.

What they are agitating for is illegal and unjustified. They don’t have any moral justification for what they are asking for.

If they are saying that the resources belong to the whole country, yes we agree. The host communities should also benefit because they are suffering, especially from oil exploration. Their means of livelihood: fishing and farming, have been destroyed, and they want to use the resources to develop the communities. Why are they angry?

It is proper for the Federal Government to give states more money for development. But our problem: will the states justify the money that is given to them? Some states may justify it, other states may not. But they should be given more money.

Mina Jamabo,

Civil Servant

In terms of this revenue allocation thing, you know during the groundnut pyramid and the cocoa days in the northern and western Nigeria, derivation revenue was 100 per cent then. But with the inception of oil and gas that came out from the Niger Delta, it now seems as if we are starting from the beginning. You know asking from three per cent to 13 per cent, and uptill now, even 50 per cent is not good enough for the Niger Delta because that is where the resources come from and the terrain is difficult. They have not satisfied the yearnings of the Niger Delta and they are now asking for a revenue increase.

They are not really truthful about it. Because they create nothing. All the groundnut pyramid in the days when groundnut was very vital, they really utilized to develop the northern Nigeria. Now, they are still using the oil and gas revenue coming from the Niger Delta to develop the North.

To me, that is okay for them than asking for more. If they are asking for more, they should give Niger Delta well above 50 per cent so that they too can ask for additional resources.

That is the way I see it.

For you to use what is here to develop the North, I think Nigeria has tried. They try and find a way to develop the Niger Delta. Because in the Niger Delta, our lives, our fishes in the river, every thing is polluted. For us to cover up what we have lost in that sector, I think it will take us over five decades. So, they should not say their revenue should be increased for now. Whatever increment should start from the Niger Delta.

I will advise the northern governors to go into other areas than oil. Because we know the North produces the food Nigeria eats today. So, whatever they want, they could be given agricultural loans to boost farming so that the groundnut era could come back again. The cocoa era could come back. Let us not just talk about revenue from oil alone. They should look for other sectors to develop.

Mr. Enyize Nwokugha,

Civil Servant

This their oil something. How can they give northerners our resources? We are the people that have the oil, and we are not gaining anything from it. I don’t know. How northerners go talk say make them no pay us derivation money? (sic).

Mr. Akekue Michael,

Retired Civil Servant

What I have to say is that whatever the southern governors demand is right because the oil is derived from our area. We are supposed to have a reasonable percentage of whatever benefit that may be accruing from that oil.

I am of the opinion that the states should have taken more because we have much to do within the states, especially considering the geographical consideration of the area. They even benefit more than what we benefit from here. I am of the opinion that whatever they are agitating for is not necessary. The North should depend on their groundnut for additional revenue.

Prince Jasy,

Civil Servant

Whatever you decide that is what you will take. Lion share na him you go take (sic). I am of the opinion that we take lion share. A stranger will not take more than the owner. They, the northern governors, should exploit their resources for more revenue.

Opinion

Agony In Ivory Tower

Published

23 hours ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”

The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.

The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.

Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.

Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.

The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the Heads of Department can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.

The Governing Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script, inputting of wrong results and sorting. This is necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

23 hours ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”

In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.

In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.

When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.

Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.

Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.

Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.

Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes

Published

1 week ago

March 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”

The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.

Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.

For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.

Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.

Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.

By: King Onunwor