Opinion

Of Ebola And Boko Haram (I)

Published

12 years ago

September 5, 2014

Ebola Virus disease is more daring, dreaded,
deadly and dangerous than Boko Haram. Whereas Boko Haram strikes people found in their domain of North-East, Nigeria, especially in Borno State, Ebola kills people anywhere, even in the remote village and inside one’s bedroom.
Since the arrival of this giant killer, called Ebola in Nigeria, stress and tension increased in a nation that over stressed becaase of Boko Haram insurgency in the northern part of Nigeria. Movement to countries affected by its virus is somehow restricted. Many international conferences in Nigeria have been cancelled. Movement of people from other countries to Nigeria is reduced and ban placed on the movement of corpses in and outsideNigeria. Burial, which is a celebration in Nigeria, particularly in Ikwerre land is now low-keyed. Attention, attendance and vibrancy given to burials in Nigeria are curtailed. People attend burial nowadays with fears and caution.
Hospitals and other health care services in Nigeria are now in disarray. Fears has gripped doctors, nurses and other health care providers. This is because they don’t know which of the patients they are about to treat is infected with Ebola virus. Health workers these days dress like people going to the space because of Ebola.
Hand shake, which is common among Nigerians is now forbidden and avoided. People are no more comfortable relating with their fellow Nigerians. In commercial buses and taxis, people are suspicious of each other. Ebola virus disease is separating mankind, drawing lines and demarcating nations. This is what Ebola is doing to Nigeria that Boko Haram could not do.
Of all ailments and diseases we have seen and heard, such as HIV/AIDS, cancer, stroke, typhoid, malaria, diabetes, hypertension, tuberculosis among others, none is as daring, troublesome, problematic and dangerous as Ebola Virus disease. Worse still, Ebola has no cure or vaccine for now. If I may ask, where is the world and its inhabitants particularly Nigeria is heading to?
Ebola virus disease was first discovered in 1976 in Zaire, now Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ebola is a name of a River, called Ebola River in that country. Ebola River has a tick forest where all kinds of animals inhabit. They include Apes, gorillas, monkeys, chimpanzees, reptiles, etc. Also, birds of the sky of different species perch in Ebola Forest.
It is believed that the animals and birds in Ebola River Forest feed on infected fruits and animals and in the Forest. Thus, it is through consumption of these animals and birds that the virus was transmitted to the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo . Hence, it was called “Ebola Virus disease.” Besides Democratic Republic of Congo, countries like Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and recently, Nigeria have recorded cases of Ebola Virus disease.
Ebola virus disease was imported into Nigeria on July 20, 2014 by a Liberian-American, late Mr. Patrick Sawyer. Mr. Sawyer contracted Ebola virus from his sister, who died of the disease on July 8, 2014. He was a staff of the ArcelorMittal, an iron mining company based in Liberia. He was diagnosed and discovered of contracting the Ebola virus and was quarantined in Buchanan, Liberia. But regrettably Sawyer was cleared to travel to Nigeria for an ECOWAS conference in Calabar by the Liberian authority, even though he was under isolation and observation.
Sawyer arrived Nigeria under excruciating pain and weakness, and was found laying flat on his stomach on the floor in the corridor of the Airport. Unknown that he was suffering with Ebola virus disease he was helped by the Airport Porters to a hospital at Obalande, Lagos for medical assistance. He was diagnosed and found of contracting Ebola virus, and he subsequently died. Sadly, a female medical doctor, Stella Ameyo Adadevoh who attended to Sawyer, contracted Ebola virus and had died of the disease. Nurses and others who had physical contact with Sawyer are now quarantined and monitored.
I laughed when late Sawyer’s wife who said she knew her late husband more than anybody, including Sawyer himself that Sawyer came to Nigeria merely to seek for a better medical attention. I wonder when Nigeria became a super nation in health care services than USA and India where he should had gone for a better medical care, if indeed he was seeking for a better health care service. However, for me, I saw Sawyer’s travel and death in Nigeria as a conspiracy, deliberate and calculated attempt by the Liberian government and ECOWAS states to wake Nigeria up against the disease.
Ogbuehi, a journalist, wrote in from Port Harcourt.
To be continued.
Their thinking is that the world will not pay proper attention to the deadly virus until it gets to Nigeria, being the most populous black nation on earth. Hence, ECOWAS invited Sawyer for a conference in Nigeria and Liberia cleared him to attend, not minding that he was on observation of Ebola virus. Again, I saw Sawyer’s death in Nigeria as a honourable one. Had he died quietly in Liberia, no one would have heard about Patrick Sawyer and much about Ebola, as we have heard and known it now.
By choosing to die in Nigeria, Mr. Sawyer had no doubt immortalized himself and saved many people in Afri who would have ignorantly contracted the virus. Today, indeed the attention of Nigeria, Africa and the world on Ebola virus disease is unprecedented. Also, . measures are been taken. I heard that the trees harbouring bats and other birds dropping faeces on visitors’ cars in the Presidential Villa, Abuja are now cut-off. Courtesy of late Patrick Sawyer.
My only regret, however, is the death of a female doctor, Ms. Adadevoh who battled to save Sawyer’s life and later discovered that he was suffering with Ebola virus, and she quickly quarantined him. And of course other health workers infected by their close contact with Sawyer. May God save their lives for working to save other peoples’ lives.
Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria began in 2008 or thereabout in Borno State, North East, Nigeria by one Yesuf who started by brain washing the youth of the area with strange and doubtful Islamic doctrines, which resulted to pockets of crises here and there. Yesuf was arrested and later killed. Since then, Nigeria has not known peace as the organisation has turned into full blown terrorism and have murdered thousands of people.
I agreed with Nigerian minister of health, Prof. Onyebuchi Chukwu that Sawyer’s action has placed unnecessary stress on Nigeria, considering the stress the nation is passing through over Boko Haram insurgency in the North East, Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the basic things to do to prevent the spread of Ebola are keeping good hygiene and sanitation, avoiding physical contact with Ebola infected patients or persons, regular washing of hands, keeping away from infected animals and eating of bush meats, touching of infected died persons, ensuring that Ebota infected persons are isolated etc. ‘
Ebola symptoms are weakness, diarrhea, stomach pain, headache, fever, vomiting, depression, red’ eyes, cold, confusion, cough, sore throat, chest pain, joints and muscles pain, internal and external bleeding etc. 21 days are Ebola virus incubation period. These are Ebola deadly weapons against human race.
I wish the Federal Government could deploy great Ebola to Boko Haram, or Ebola would on its own walk boldly and majestically to Sambisa forest or wherever their camp may be to engage them in the battle of supremacy. By the time Ebola deploy five of its deadly weapons like weakness, diarrhea, dislocation of joint and muscles, excruciating pain, they will surrender and let Nigeria be, and of course give Borno and the neighbouring states a breathing space.
President Goodluck Jonathan and Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos state should be commended for their bold and prompt steps taken to prevent the spread of Ebola virus in Nigeria. Late Dr. Stella Ameyo Adadevoh, the daughter of Prof. Babatunde Kwaku Adadevoh and great grand daughter of Nigerian Nationalist, Late Herbert Macaulay should be commended and honoured for diagnosing Sawyer as an Ebola virus infected patient and quarantined him. Dr. Adadevoh sacrificed her life to save Nigerians.
It is sad and regrettable that Rivers State Government has chosen Oduoha-Emohua, my community as a quarantine (isolation) centre of the Ebola virus infected patients. It is indeed sad that Ebola virus disease discovered in faraway Democratic Republic of Congo has now a camp for its victims in Oduoha-Emohua. Well, I pray that God will also choose Oduoha-Emohua as a healing centre of the universe of all the and ailments diseases. Afterall, our ancestors prided Oduoha-Emohua as a hospitable community; and it has been known as such to this days. Could that be the reason of sitjing on Ebola centre in Oduoha-Emohua? To God be the glory.
Ogbuehi, a journalist and social commentator, wrote in from Port Harcourt.

Prince Ike Ogbuehi

Opinion

Tackling Nigeria’s Health Sector Challenges

Published

4 days ago

May 27, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “A nation’s health system is not measured by promises made, but by the quality of care available to its people when they need it most.” mm

Every year on April 7, Nigeria joins the rest of the world in commemorating World Health Day, a day dedicated to reflecting on global health challenges and strengthening healthcare systems. The occasion, which marks the anniversary of the establishment of the World Health Organization (WHO), is often accompanied by speeches and policy declarations highlighting government efforts in the health sector. This year was no different. The Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare, Iziaq Adekunle Salako, reaffirmed the commitment of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration to improving healthcare delivery. Across the states, governments showcased their interventions, with Governor Siminalayi Fubara reiterating efforts to position Rivers State as a health tourism hub. While such declarations may inspire hope, they also raise an important question: how much of this commitment is reflected in the daily realities of ordinary Nigerians?

Despite years of promises and reforms, the nation’s health sector remains burdened by structural deficiencies, inadequate funding, and policy inconsistencies. The result is a system struggling to meet the needs of a growing population. One of the most pressing challenges is the continued migration of healthcare professionals. Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other skilled personnel are leaving the country in large numbers in search of better remuneration, improved working conditions, and greater career opportunities abroad. This persistent brain drain has widened the gap between available healthcare workers and the population they serve. With too few professionals left to cater for millions of Nigerians, hospitals are overstretched, waiting times are longer, and the quality of care is often compromised. Rural communities suffer the most, as many health facilities lack qualified personnel, forcing residents to travel long distances for basic medical attention.

Closely linked to this challenge is inadequate funding. For decades, budgetary allocations to health have remained below internationally recommended levels. Consequently, many public hospitals operate with obsolete equipment, poor infrastructure, and shortages of essential medicines. In several facilities, healthcare workers are compelled to improvise under difficult conditions, reducing the effectiveness of service delivery. The high cost of healthcare is another major concern. With only a small percentage of Nigerians covered by health insurance, most citizens pay for medical services directly from their pockets. For many households already grappling with economic hardship, healthcare expenses can be overwhelming. As a result, people often delay treatment, resort to self-medication, or seek help from unregulated providers, worsening health outcomes and deepening poverty.

Healthcare inequality between urban and rural areas further compounds the crisis. While major cities generally have better-equipped hospitals and a higher concentration of medical professionals, many rural communities are served by underfunded or non-functional primary healthcare centres. This imbalance leaves millions of Nigerians without access to quality healthcare and reinforces existing social and economic disparities. Industrial disputes have also become a recurring challenge. Strikes by healthcare workers, often triggered by unpaid salaries, inadequate welfare packages, and poor working conditions, continue to disrupt services and put lives at risk. The recent suspension of a nationwide strike by the National Association of Resident Doctors over salary arrears, hazard allowances, and residency training funding once again highlighted unresolved issues within the sector.

Another serious concern is the proliferation of counterfeit and substandard drugs. Weak regulatory enforcement allows fake medicines to find their way into the market, undermining treatment outcomes and endangering lives. Tackling this menace requires stronger oversight, stricter sanctions, and improved coordination among relevant agencies. Addressing these challenges demands more than ceremonial speeches or periodic interventions. Healthcare is not a luxury; it is a fundamental component of national development. A healthy population is essential for economic productivity, social stability, and sustainable growth. The theme of this year’s World Health Day, “Together for Health: Stand with Science,” underscores the importance of evidence-based policymaking and investment in innovation. Advances in medical science, digital health technology, vaccines, and diagnostics have transformed healthcare globally.

Nigeria must position itself to benefit from these innovations through increased investment in research, technology, and partnerships involving government, academia, and the private sector. More importantly, there must be sustained political will to implement reforms. The Federal Government should increase budgetary allocations to health, strengthen institutions, and ensure effective implementation of healthcare policies. State governments must also recognize their responsibility in delivering quality healthcare and invest accordingly. Retaining healthcare professionals should be a top priority. Better remuneration, improved working conditions, opportunities for career advancement, and incentives for service in rural communities would help reduce the exodus of skilled personnel. Expanding health insurance coverage is equally critical to reducing out-of-pocket expenses and making healthcare more accessible to vulnerable populations.

Strengthening primary healthcare is another urgent necessity. As the first point of contact for most Nigerians, primary healthcare centres must be adequately equipped, properly staffed, and effectively managed. Investments at this level would improve health outcomes, reduce pressure on tertiary hospitals, and bring healthcare closer to the people. Ultimately, the condition of a nation’s health sector reflects its priorities. A government genuinely committed to the welfare of its citizens cannot afford to treat healthcare as an afterthought. As Nigerians mark World Health Day, attention must shift from rhetoric to action. The challenges facing the sector are well known, and the solutions are within reach. What is needed now is bold, sustained, and sincere commitment to reform. The health and wellbeing of millions of Nigerians depend on it.

2): At 59, Rivers’ Agropotential Lost?

Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Quote: “No society can sustainably prosper when it neglects the sector that feeds its people, creates jobs, powers industries, and secures its future.”

As Rivers State marks 59 years of its creation, there is every reason to celebrate its achievements in politics, infrastructure, commerce, education, and human capital development. Yet, amid the celebrations, one critical question demands attention: what has become of agriculture, once a major pillar of the state’s economy? Before crude oil became dominant, farming, fishing, and livestock production sustained livelihoods across communities such as Etche, Ikwerre, Ahoada, Ogba, Abua, Kalabari, Andoni, Opobo, Khana, Gokana, and Tai. Families depended on proceeds from cassava, yam, cocoyam, maize, vegetables, oil palm, fish, and other agricultural products to fund education, support households, and drive local commerce. Recognising agriculture’s importance, successive governments introduced programmes aimed at increasing food production and modernising farming.

Investments were made in extension services, fish farming schemes, livestock development, youth empowerment initiatives, and farm settlements. One notable intervention was the Songhai Farms project in Bunu-Tai, established to train young people in modern integrated farming and agribusiness. Governments also distributed improved seedlings, fertilisers, fishing equipment, and supported cooperative societies to encourage productivity and value addition. Despite these efforts, the outcomes have largely fallen short of expectations. Many projects suffered from inadequate funding, poor implementation, or policy discontinuity. Programmes launched by one administration were often abandoned by another, resulting in wasted resources and unrealised goals. At the same time, the dominance of oil revenue reduced interest in agriculture.

As opportunities expanded in the oil and gas sector, many young people abandoned farming, which gradually became associated with hardship and poverty rather than prosperity. Environmental challenges further weakened the sector. Oil spills, gas flaring, flooding, erosion, and pollution have damaged farmlands, rivers, and creeks across the state. Communities that once relied heavily on farming and fishing have seen productivity decline due to ecological degradation. These challenges continue to discourage investment and limit agricultural growth. Today, Rivers State faces a troubling paradox. Despite its vast arable land, abundant water resources, favourable climate, and large consumer market, it relies heavily on food supplies from other parts of Nigeria. Tomatoes, rice, vegetables, fish, and poultry products consumed in local markets are often transported from distant states. This dependence exposes the state to rising transportation costs, inflation, supply disruptions, and food insecurity.

Whenever insecurity, flooding, or fuel price increases affect transportation networks, food prices in Rivers State rise sharply, placing additional pressure on households. These realities highlight the urgent need for an agricultural renaissance. At 59, Rivers State must relaunch agriculture not as a political slogan but as a strategic economic priority. Such a relaunch should begin with a comprehensive agricultural master plan that transcends political administrations. Agriculture requires consistency and long-term commitment, since farmers invest over seasons rather than election cycles. Youth participation must be central to this new vision. Modern agriculture is increasingly driven by technology, mechanisation, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Greenhouse farming, aquaculture, poultry production, food processing, hydroponics, and agritech solutions have transformed agriculture into a profitable business globally.

Rivers State can establish agricultural incubation centres where young people receive training, access to land, start-up support, and mentorship, thereby creating a new generation of agripreneurs while tackling unemployment. Access to affordable finance is equally important. Many farmers struggle to secure credit because of stringent lending conditions. Government can partner with financial institutions to create specialised agricultural financing schemes offering low-interest loans and flexible repayment options. Strengthening cooperatives would also improve farmers’ access to resources, markets, and modern inputs. Infrastructure development remains critical. Good road networks linking rural communities to urban markets would reduce transportation costs and post-harvest losses. Investments in storage facilities, cold rooms, processing centres, and rural electrification would improve productivity and profitability.

Particular attention should be given to aquaculture. With its extensive rivers, creeks, wetlands, and coastline, Rivers State has enormous potential to become a major fish-producing hub, creating jobs and reducing dependence on imports. The oil palm subsector also presents significant opportunities. Before the oil boom, the Niger Delta was renowned for palm oil production. Revitalising plantations and supporting smallholder farmers can stimulate agro-industrial development, increase export earnings, and strengthen rural economies. Beyond economic gains, agricultural revitalisation offers important social benefits. Increased food production can lower food prices and improve nutrition. Job creation can reduce poverty, youth restiveness, and rural-urban migration. Agriculture also supports a wide range of value-chain activities, including transportation, processing, packaging, marketing, and equipment maintenance, creating multiplier effects throughout the economy.

Communities where young people are productively engaged are generally more stable and secure. Food security has become an increasingly urgent national concern. Recent economic challenges and inflationary pressures have exposed the risks of relying heavily on food supplies from distant locations. A state that can feed itself is better positioned to withstand economic shocks and uncertainties. As Rivers State celebrates its 59th anniversary, the occasion should inspire renewed commitment to agricultural development. The state possesses the land, water, climate, manpower, and market needed for success. What remains is the political will, strategic planning, and sustained investment required to unlock these potentials. The future prosperity of Rivers State cannot depend solely on oil revenues whose fortunes fluctuate with global market forces. Diversification is no longer optional; it is an economic necessity.

Fifty-nine years after creation, the message is clear: Rivers State must return to the land—not as a retreat to the past, but as a bold investment in a more secure, prosperous, and sustainable future. Agriculture remains one of the surest pathways to food security, employment generation, inclusive growth, and economic resilience. The seeds of that future already exist in our soil. What is needed now is the collective determination to cultivate them.

Opinion

At 59, Rivers’ Agropotential Lost?

Published

4 days ago

May 27, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “No society can sustainably prosper when it neglects the sector that feeds its people, creates jobs, powers industries, and secures its future.”

Opinion

Monthly Environmental Sanitation Imperative

Published

2 weeks ago

May 18, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “A clean environment is not a government gift; it is a civic duty that protects our health, preserves our cities, and reflects our national character.”

For many Nigerians who grew up in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, the last Saturday of every month followed a familiar pattern. Roads were deserted, markets closed, and residents swept compounds, cleared gutters, cut overgrown weeds, and disposed off refuse. The monthly environmental sanitation exercise became a national ritual that promoted cleanliness, discipline, and civic responsibility. As an environment correspondent about two decades ago, I joined officials of the Rivers State Ministry of Environment on sanitation monitoring tours across Port Harcourt and surrounding communities. Although enforcement officers were sometimes accused of excesses, the exercise succeeded in creating public awareness about the importance of keeping our surroundings clean. Over time, however, the practice faded away in many states.

In its absence, indiscriminate dumping of refuse, blocked drainages and environmental neglect became increasingly common. Today, heaps of waste line roads, markets and motor parks, while gutters clogged with plastics contribute to perennial flooding. Given the mounting environmental challenges facing Nigerian cities, there is no better time to revive environmental sanitation. Its return is no longer a matter of nostalgia; it is a practical necessity for public health, environmental safety, and sustainable development. Poor sanitation remains a major cause of disease. Stagnant water and uncollected waste create breeding grounds for mosquitoes, flies and rodents, increasing the risk of malaria, cholera, typhoid and other infections. Floodwaters contaminated by refuse also expose communities to serious health hazards.

Rapid urbanisation has worsened the situation. Cities such as Lagos, Port Harcourt and Abuja are expanding faster than their waste management systems can cope. As populations grow, so does the volume of waste generated daily. Monthly sanitation exercises can help rebuild environmental consciousness. Beyond cleaning streets, they remind citizens that environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. They also offer an opportunity to educate children and young people about hygiene, public health and community participation. Critics argue that the old sanitation policy restricted movement and was sometimes abused by security personnel. Those concerns were valid, but they do not invalidate the concept itself. Rather than abandon it, governments should reform the programme to make it more humane, participatory and transparent.

That is why the recent decision by the Lagos State Government to reintroduce monthly sanitation deserves commendation. Even if participation is largely voluntary, the move sends a strong signal that environmental responsibility must be taken seriously. Other states should emulate this initiative. In Rivers State, the Rivers State Waste Management Agency has intensified efforts to improve waste collection and restore Port Harcourt’s reputation as the Garden City. Reintroducing monthly sanitation would complement these efforts and deepen public involvement. At the federal level, policies such as the Digital Waste Marketplace, the Plastic Waste Policy and the National Waste Management Network are commendable. However, environmental sanitation remains one of the most direct and visible ways to mobilise citizens toward cleaner communities.

The exercise, however, must be supported by efficient waste management infrastructure. Citizens cannot be expected to maintain clean surroundings if there are inadequate waste bins, irregular refuse collection, and limited recycling facilities. Governments at all levels should invest in modern waste management systems, properly fund sanitation agencies, and promote recycling programmes. Waste sorting should become standard practice to reduce the volume of refuse ending up in landfills and drainage channels. Countries such as Singapore, Sweden and South Korea have demonstrated that waste can become a valuable economic resource. Recycling industries in these countries create jobs while protecting the environment. Nigeria can adopt similar strategies and turn waste into wealth.

Environmental laws must also be enforced consistently. Regulations against illegal dumping exist in many states but are rarely implemented. Offenders should face penalties, but enforcement must be fair and free from extortion. Urban planning is another critical factor. Poor drainage systems, overcrowding and inadequate sewage infrastructure worsen sanitation problems. Governments must prioritise road construction, drainage maintenance and orderly urban development. Markets deserve particular attention. They generate enormous quantities of waste every day, yet many lack organised disposal systems. Local councils and market associations should work together to establish effective waste collection arrangements in commercial centres. Religious institutions, schools, traditional rulers and civil society groups also have important roles to play.

Environmental responsibility should be taught and reinforced as a social value. Community leaders can help change attitudes by consistently promoting cleaner habits. This issue is even more urgent in an era of climate change. Flooding, erosion and extreme weather events are already threatening many Nigerian communities. Poor waste disposal worsens these challenges by blocking waterways and reducing urban resilience. A clean environment also offers economic benefits. Well-maintained cities attract investors, tourists and businesses. Reduced disease outbreaks lower healthcare costs and improve productivity among workers and students. More importantly, cleanliness reflects national values. A nation that allows public spaces to deteriorate projects an image of disorder and neglect. Nigerians deserve cleaner streets, healthier neighbourhoods and safer communities.

Reviving environmental sanitation will not solve all environmental problems overnight, but it can serve as a powerful starting point. Combined with effective waste management, public education and stronger infrastructure, it can restore environmental consciousness across the country. Ultimately, environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. Government must provide leadership, infrastructure and enforcement, while citizens must demonstrate discipline and civic commitment. From disposing of household waste properly to keeping drains free of obstruction, every Nigerian has a role to play. If Nigeria is serious about protecting public health, reducing flooding and building livable cities, the return of monthly environmental sanitation is a step whose time has come.

By: Calista Ezeaku