Opinion
Environmental Impact Of Noise
Noise is any sound which irritates the mind. It incapaci
tates listening, understanding and productivity. Planners of universities take noise into consideration before siting any university. This is why most universities are sited at the outskirts of cities, far away from industries. People are not conscious of the possible dangers of noise. Whereas, people living in Europe and America, not merely conscious of the dangers of noise but react against those who generate noise with musical instruments, plants and speech. They sue them to court and make them pay for damage done.
Noise hinders listening. Although, a good listener does everything possible to overcome distractions, push out unnecessary sounds from the mind to aid concentration and listening. Noise that is at the highest pitch can frustrate listening. It can affect the ears and cause ear sickness. Every ear doctor advises people against tuning radio or television to its highest pitch to save the eardrums from being damaged. It is much more deplorable if an individual tunes any of the sound devices to the highest pitch and never uses an earphone to listen to music.
The destructive capacity of noise is perhaps not glaring to most persons. Students are most likely to fail examinations if Pavlov conditioning is adopted to prove the capacity of noise for a period of one semester. Scholars will reap the same result if they are kept in a noisy environment for a long period of time; results will be altered, or delayed, while some will suffer academic abortions.
The body requires rest after much work. All humans sleep naturally after working for several hours. But if the environment is noisy, sleep will be disturbed and a person is forced to wake from sleep like fish forced out of water with dynamite. The initial impact may be small but if the same problem re- occurs several times, the body will slack and break down eventually.
Institutions that are involved in research will never take it kindly with those who make noise deliberately to hinder research. They will sue the agents of noise to court for losing millions or billions of naira. Noise has its economic disadvantages to individuals, groups, institutions, states and nations. This consciousness will never allow workers to compromise noise making or love noise makers who will make them risk their jobs.
Is the noise ofa plant pleasant? The answer is Yes and No Such sound which is accommodated for purposes of electrification, ironing, watching television, listening to radio, using computer, reading makes man more comfortable. But if there are several plants of different ages which produce different sounds, the environment will be very noisy and uncomfortable for active minds who want to engage them.
How can this problem be solved?
America, Europe and the advanced nations ofthe world give the job to companies or governments to produce electricity. This reduces the many plants that disturb communication, learning and other activities. The authorities site them in places that are conducive. One can drive through sections of a city without knowing where the plant is located. Indeed, it is possible to go through the whole city without coming close to a noisy plant which distracts the neighbourhood.
African countries should be armed with this consciousness in planning for their environment. Electrification is not a luxury, nor an impossible task to accomplish.
A noisy atmosphere generates an inauspicious surrounding. Why do people commit crimes easily in ghettoes? The noise, rowdy and cloudy atmosphere makes criminals to elude vigilance easily. The atmosphere permits the possibility of lawlessness: dancing and blocking streets in Lagos, Port Harcourt and other places. Street fighting is not impossible in such all atmosphere.
One wonders why enlightened persons can not use civic centres and other places provided for partying and other acti vities.
Churches and mosques are not supposed to be built in residential areas. When the congregations sing and pray on the pitch oftheir voices, they disturb their neighbourhood. Residents may complain of the inactivity microphones and human voices cause them. If they do not, it is simply because government has not made a firm law against noise or, they are not aware of it, or they accommodate it without asking for peace legally. If they are sited in residential areas, the alternative is to reduce noise to the barest minimum. The sounds produced in the religious groups should be for the hearing of members alone. Members should adopt silent but effective means of evangelism. Noise does not do that job.
Some Nigerian drivers think that horning often is a sign of good driving. They horn several times without rationality. Some use the tap style to horn in a chain. Others press their horns ceaselessly for minutes. The rational act should be to horn when pedestrians are seen crossing the road at a close range. Some are ignorant of this and feel that they could use their horns as drums beaten stylishly for aesthetic caution and enlightenment.
Markets are places where one expects a certain degree of noise in Nigeria, as well as other countries that adopt haggling as the pattern of selling and buying. Individuals talk, react and bargain over goods and prices. They laugh, argue, disagree or agree. Individuals meet coincidentally after weeks, months and years.
They exchange pleasantries – scream, hug, laugh and ask after members of their families. People within the environment expect no less.
There are other disturbing situations usually caused by people selling and buying on railways and other unauthorised areas in Rivers State and other states in Nigeria. They obstruct traffic, impose themselves on neighbourhoods, break the law and generate noise in such areas. Visitors are given the wrong impression that people are lawless. The truth is far fetched ; government has driven them from such places several times. They are the stubborn ‘ogbanjes’, ‘abikus’ and ‘patas’ coming back at short notices. The traders are clamorous; they shout at passers-by, calling them to come and buy, while they arc struggling to pass through the routes that have been blocked to their various destinations
What kind of consciousness does such an atmosphere evoke? None than a clamorous one painted with poverty, pursuit of money wrongly and taking economic and physical risks. The sellers are ready to go straight to the lowest prices. Everyone is in a hurry. Thieves walk sluggishly, tryings to steal from buyers. The passers-by and buyers who know their traits hold their purses and wallets firmly.
The traders who dress neatly and walk into offices to sell in Nigeria during office hours are those who provoke individuals, who believe in orderliness to think ofthe degeneration of decency and order. Why should such persons walk into institutions like universities, federal and state ministries to hawk? If the authorities discourage or prevent them, order will be re-established. Those areas are meant for brains to work-and get results of development for states and the nation. The sellers distract the workers and
make noise. They are like fish out of water, they are not meant to be seen in such places.
People shout, laugh, run, dance, sing and drum during festivals in reserved areas. The sound made is not offensive. It is a pleasant means of expelling unwanted emotions from the minds of people. Minds are prepared for them, settings accommodate them, participants and audience rejoice in production and performance.
In conclusion, individuals, groups and institutions may be aware of the effects of noise but have done very little to eliminate them from unwanted places. People should be conscious of the disadvantages and effects of noise on minds at work. We gain
more to eliminate noise from areas that have been planned for serious research works and residence.
Ngaage is of the Dept of English, Niger Delta University.
Sarine Saana Ngaage
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
