Opinion
Checking Resource Wastage By Security Operatives
Security of lives and property in any human society is very vital to the development and peace of such societies. Indeed, the basic oath hat all our leaders swore has to do with the protection of human lives and properties, asking
of the society habitable and better than it was then they assumed power.
This underscores the importance of the military and other security operatives who are saddled with the herculean task of enforcing the security of the nation.
Unfortunately, the more the security operatives do their work of securing lives and properties of both public and private persons in the nation, the more those who hate peace anct securitv in order to satisfy their selfish motive find ways of beating security to do their harmful business.
In the Niger-Delta area of the country, and some other parts where oil pipelines traverse, oil theft has almost become a daily occurrence making the nation lose very huge sums of money. The Nigerian nation loses billions of had currency which if properly managed, would have greatly turned the fortunes of the nation for the better.
The activities of oil thieves could better be imagined when one comes face to face with the terrible environmental degradation and havoc, the human, economic, material, and health wastages and damages that arise from activities of such thieves who are basically lured into this activity by greed and the desire to be over rich overnight. It is obvious that oil theft is very bad and dangerous so every right thinking person needs to out-rightly condemn it more because of the hazard it poses and the economic wastage it causes.
But the big question that will arise as it relates to how the security operatives deal with the suspected vessels used in conveying the stolen oil is whether it is right and proper for the task force or the military saddled with the responsibility of stopping the oil thieves to continue to destroy the vessels and the contents stolen and hidden in the vessels?
It is now common seeing the military and other security personnel destroying vessels of suspected stolen oil. In most cases, the destruction of these vessels are done by setting them ablaze and are carried out without taking into consideration the environment where the vessels are set ablaze while the criminals behind the dastardly acts are reported to be at large. There have been cases of such burning of tankers and the on the busy East- West road alongEleme – Onne axis even some have been reported in the Warri area of Delta State.
It is no longer news that so many people in the country now see the pilfering of natural wealth as a big business despite the negative consequences this unwholesome practice can cause to the economy, environment, and indeed every facet of our national life.
Some of these sharp practices range from corruption, which has eaten deep into the fabric of the life of the nation, looting of different kinds and magnitude, abduction and kidnapping, child trafficking and trading, killings by every guise and pretence, insecurity, oil theft and illegal bunkering and so many more, commonly characterize the Nigerian nation.
The governments at the different levels have been doing their best to curb these ill-practices in order to make the society better and more habitable yet those involved in them rather than give up their unpalatable doings and practices, have been going more “digital” in their approach and in the ways they carry out their trade.
Just as the common African adage has it, a child who does not allow the mother to sleep will know no sleep. The more the criminals device more means and ways of carrying out their criminality, the more the law enforcement agencies get geared up in tackling them head long.
These days the Joint Military Task-Force (JTF) and other operatives who are saddled with responsibility of combating oil theft in the Niger-Delta area resort to the burning of vessels which they apprehend to have been used in conveying the stolen oil. As good as the efforts in apprehending these thieves rnay be, the question still comes, is burning of suspected vessels containing stolen oil the best option open to the military? If yes, why don’t they consider the place where these vessels are to be burnt as not to cause harm to the people and the environment.
A case in point was the setting on fire of a boat suspected to be carrying petroleum product along the Opobo axis of Imo River on Saturday, is” May, 2013, allegedly set on fire by men of the Nigerian Navy attached to Ikot Abasi Naval Base, Akwa Ibom State.
Idanye Oruigoni
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
