Editorial
Lamorde’s Lamentation
A revelation recently by the Chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Lamorde that his agency was handicapped in the discharge of its duties is very worrisome and thought provoking. The EFCC boss told the Senate Committee on Security that some politicians have placed impediments in the way of the commission’s, duties.
According to him, the commission’s ability to follow-up on high profile cases face so much impediments, leaving his organisation with only petty criminals to pursue. Lamorde said much progress cannot be made in the fight against economic and financial crimes until the situation changes.
This revelation could not have come at a better time than now that the fight against corruption has taken the front burner in national discourse following cases of massive scams in the petroleum ,pensions, and other sectors of the economy.
Besides, it gives us another opportunity to appraise the activities of the EFCC in its duty to reduce crime in a country rated as one of the highest in the world. This is why Lamorde’s guts in speaking up against the state of corruption and sundry crimes in our country is very commendable.
Most worrisome, however, is his accusation against the judiciary which he lambasted for not being helpful in the fight against corruption through the use of various avoidable, even questionable legal technicalities, to stall prosecution and conviction of big time criminals.
It is clear to all that if corruption is not arrested the people would be worse for it, as the crusade by government to stem the malaise would amount to nothing. Besides, if perpetrators of corrupt practices are not apprehended and punished, it would serve as an incentive for others and further send Nigeria backward.
Given the foregoing, The Tide thinks that with the statutory powers at the disposal of the EFCC, Lamorde should find ingenous ways of performing his duties or step aside honourably. We think that with his open acceptance of failure occasioned by alleged clogs in the way, Lamorde does not look like a candidate ready or willing to confront corruption head-on.
We say so because any accused has the right to defence and if possible obtain freedom through any means, while the state should also be equipped enough to root them out. Besides, it is the same EFCC that was used to successfully prosecute a former Inspector General of Police, (IGP) and a former Governor, among others.
This, however, is not to say that there could not be stumbling blocks on the way of the EFCC, we believe that a versatile crime fighter like Lamorde could still make reasonable impact with the powers already at the disposal of the EFCC.
We think that the challenges in the system should serve as opportunity for Lamorde to prove to Nigerians that his appointment was not a mistake. We refuse to believe that criminals in Nigeria have become smarter than the law officers including the EFCC. To start with, the commission must ask itself if proper investigations are done to gather enough evidence that the courts can use.
Besides, EFCC should not expect to make much progress at the judiciary where they send ill-prepared prosecutors to do battle with properly motivated Senior Advocates of Nigeria hired by the defence. EFCC must go for lawyers that can cut through the legal barricades put up by such learned defence counsels and expose the criminal to the sharp edges of the law.
Even so, we expect the judiciary to take another look at itself and to ensure that nothing on their part compromises justice and legitimises corruption in Nigeria. Indeed, the time has come for some courts to be dedicated to corruption cases only to ensure speedy dispensation of justice in that area.
In order that EFCC does not continue to blame others for their inability to deal with corruption, the Nigerian nation may need to take a que from China or at least, remove EFCC from under the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, especially because the whole idea is not to control the body but to let it deal with corruption in the country. If their autonomy is what is needed for crime to loose its strangling hold on Nigeria, let it be granted.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
