Editorial
Reps’ Stance On Adulterated PMS Unacceptable
The House of Representatives, last Thursday, stunned Nigerians when it declared that nobody
would be sanctioned for the supply of adulterated Premium Motor Spirit, otherwise known as petrol, which caused a major crisis in Nigeria’s fuel chain and untold hardship for Nigerians.
At plenary, the House considered and adopted the reviewed report on the investigation by its Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream), which exonerated both the Nigeria National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited, former Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, and the suppliers in the Direct Sale-Direct Purchase deal between the Federal Government and the importers.
Tempers had frayed in the House on February 10, 2022, over the importation of the methanol-contaminated petrol. Several members who spoke on the development called for severe sanctions against the Federal Government agencies and officials who failed to carry out due diligence before passing the product for onward distribution to marketers.
Consequently, the House had resolved to investigate the matter, insisting that those in the import and distribution chain, whose action or inaction led to the spread of the commodity, must be held accountable. The Majority Whip, Mohammed Monguno, had moved a motion of urgent public importance, titled “Need to Investigate the Release and Sale of Adulterated Premium Motor Spirit in Petrol Stations Across Nigeria”.
However, the committee had presented a report that failed to address the main issues for which it ordered the probe, causing the House to reject it. Several members of the House had, on March 23, 2022, criticised the earlier report by the committee as failing to hold any persons, groups, or companies responsible for the development or recommend sanctions.
Curiously, the recommendations in the second report were similar to those in the first version, yet, the House endorsed them. The committee recommended, among others, “that based on the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited exoneration, the four oil marketers/importers (Duke Oil; MRS Oil and Gas; Oando Oil; and Emadeb, Energy/Hyde/AY Maikifi/Britannia-U Consortium) did not commit any offence, therefore, not recommended for suspension”.
Reprehensible as the adoption of the recommendations may be, the House needs to explain to Nigerians why the second report was accepted over the first whereas both had similar contents. So, what has changed? We can only conclude that the lawmakers completely shied away from indicting the NNPC to avoid implicating President Muhammadu Buhari, who doubles as Petroleum Minister. This is yet another clear indication that the Nigerian government is unserious about the anti-graft war.
Nigerians should reject this obnoxious report. In keeping with its promise, the Federal Government should set up an independent panel of inquiry (if it has not done so) to examine the circumstances that characterised the importation of the contaminated petroleum products into the country by the NNPC and its contractors. The sack of the heads of the regulatory authorities must be part of measures to bring sanity to the chaos created by their failure to act appropriately.
Allowing NNPC management staff involved in the importation of the bad fuel to get away with the impudence would be a rape on Nigerians’ collective integrity and ignominy to the current administration. Regulation is a government function that cannot be outsourced. But in practically all the sectors of our national economy, consumers are unfairly made to bear the brunt of regulatory failures. No sector exemplifies this anomaly more than the oil and gas industry. There must be full accountability, sanctions, and compensation.
The NNPC has no hiding place; it is primarily to blame for this scandal. So, too is the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), one of the two regulatory entities created from the defunct Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR). The regulator, like the NNPC, failed woefully to detect, isolate, and prevent the filthy consignment from entering the market.
Available evidence suggests that the Corporation and the marketers are culpable. As the NNPC is the sole importer of refined crude oil, it means adequate measures to protect the interest of Nigerians were not established when the fuel was purchased, shipped, and accepted at the ports. The current development has proved beyond doubt that the nation’s petroleum industry is full of shady deals where Nigerians are perpetually deprived of the benefits of their God-given natural resources.
Nigerians, including the Federal Government, should take the matter more seriously. Beyond the investigation ordered by Buhari, by now, the NNPC bosses should have been asked to step aside. The head of Duke Oil and others involved in the importation of the bad fuel should also be suspended to allow for unimpeded investigation. A criminal investigation should be opened. Anti-graft agencies need not wait for a parliamentary probe before launching discreet investigations.
For the dirty fuel to have escaped the regulators in the country of origin, the Standard Organisation of Nigeria (SON), NNPC Quality Control and Assessment Unit, speaks volumes about negligence, omission, and commission. Even if the culprits are sanctioned, which is what everyone expects, our feeble government institutions would ensure that the sanctions are not punitive enough to deter them from playing the same tricks on Nigerians in the future.
It was highly improper for the House of Representatives to acquit the NNPC and its cohorts of their indiscretions. The lawmakers should quickly review their stance and press for the complete sack and criminal prosecution of the importers and the NNPC staff implicated in the heinous act. That is the least Nigerians expect from them.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News6 hours agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
