Opinion
Electoral Amendment Bill And PDP’s Call
Governors under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in a communiqué after their meeting in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, on Monday, called on President Muhammadu Buhari to immediately sign the Electoral Act Amendment Bill into law, saying the President’s reluctance to give his assent was an indication of his unwillingness to give Nigeria a reformed electoral framework.
That came shortly after Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike, had made a similar call, wondering why Buhari was delaying assent to the bill after the National Assembly (NASS) had amended the contentious bill in line with the president’s demand.
The issue of the Electoral Amendment Act has been on the front burner for a long time and each time you think that the matter is finally going to be rested, another twist to the saga is introduced.
It is on record that the eighth NASS under the leadership of Dr Bukola Saraki made efforts to get the amended bill become a reality, but Mr President declined his assent — for three consecutive times. Of course, he would always give reasons for his rejection of the bill. The first time, in March 2018, he said the proposed act would usurp the constitutional powers of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to decide on election matters.
Six months later, the bill was sent back to him and again he refused his assent, asking the NASS to revise some clauses. In December, when the bill was rejected for the third time, the president said signing it into law could “create uncertainty and confusion” in the forthcoming 2019 elections.
In December, 2021, the electoral act bill sent the president by the current national assembly could not receive the president’s assent. His reasons being that compulsory direct primaries will lead to the increased cost to political parties and INEC to conduct direct primaries in 8,809 wards across the country; make life difficult for small political parties; overstretch security agencies; violate freedom of choice by political parties and give rise to litigations. The president also noted that it will lead to an increase in vote-buying and that direct primaries are susceptible to manipulation.
Many Nigerians, though they believe that direct primary whereby members of a political party choose their party’s candidate as against an indirect primary whereby party members elect delegates from among themselves who in turn decide the party’s flagbearers, is more suitable in present-day Nigeria, where the state governors have hijacked the political parties and dictate who does what, they still saw wisdom in Buhari’s demand that there should be other options other than direct primaries alone.
Commendably, NASS promptly re-amended the bill, added the options of direct and indirect primaries as well as the consensus clause for the nomination of candidates by political parties for elective positions.
Not a few people thought that the lawmakers having done the biddings of the president, the amendment bill would expressly receive the president’s signature. Even Buhari himself made it clear that he would sign the bill once the lawmakers did the needful. Asked during a television interview whether he would sign the amended bill he affirmed, “Yes, I will! I will sign. There should be options, you can’t dictate to people and say you are doing democracy. Give them other options so they can make a choice.”
Today, February 18, is the eighteenth day, the amended bill was transmitted to the president by the Clerk to the National Assembly, Olatunde Ojo. It is twelve days to the constitutional time limit for the president to sign the bill and there is heightened anxiety as to whether the bill will be signed or not and what should be the action of NASS should the president reject the bill once again.
There are insinuations that the president is still consulting with his advisers on whether to sign the bill or not. And if I may borrow the words of Governor Wike, ‘What is the consultation?’
Indeed, what is the essence of the consultation? What has the president or his advisers seen in the bill that was not there the last time he rejected it. Why couldn’t they make all their observations and corrections at the same time so that the amendments would be made once and for all to save citizens from all this unnecessary tension? Why make it seem as if the electoral bill is now a party affair such that must be tailored to suit certain political parties and individuals?
The president has always said that he is going to leave a better reformed electoral system at the end of his administration; that he is not going to influence the 2023 election in any way. The test for those statements has come. He should practicalise those speeches by signing the bill into law.
With the plethora of issues that have always characterised elections in Nigeria and that have made our elections lack credibility and integrity, there is the need for the amended electoral act which, to a large extent, tackles some of the key problems in the nation’s electoral system. It makes provisions for card readers; clearly forbids members of political parties from taking up employment or appointment in INEC; defines over-voting clearly and makes provision for electronic transmission of results; requires that any political appointee that wants to run for election should resign, and many more.
By the way, why the uproar about a minister, a commissioner, a personal assistant or any other political appointee vacating his job if he wants to stand for an election? Shouldn’t that be the idle thing to do? Just a few days ago, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), faulted the promotion of the Minister of Communication and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami, to the rank of a professor; saying that “You cannot be a minister and a lecturer in a university. It is an encouragement of illegality” and that the minister has to quit his appointment and be tried for doing double jobs within the same federal system.
It is high time we began to do things right in this country. There is no way we can continue the awkward, crooked ways of doing things and expect the nation to grow. And I think even the governors and lawmakers, local government chairmen and other people holding elective positions should be included in the clause. Oftentimes, they contest for another elective position while still occupying an elective seat and that has been a major reason why some of them carry out little or no developmental projects in their domains.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
