Opinion

Rivers At 56: Journey So Far (1)

Published

3 years ago

May 26, 2023

According to the Bible Book of Exodus Chapter 19:4, it is written “Remember how I bore you on “Eagles Wing”.
This scriptural verse is instructive as it calls for sober reflection and thanksgiving.
The expression, Eagles Wing is a metaphor calling for remembrance of the blessings of God with respect to God’s protection, provision and grace.
As Rivers State marks its 56 anniversary, the song that should be on the lips of Rivers people should be the celebration of God’s goodness in 56 years inspite of the threat of disunity from diversity and heterogeneous culture. After all, it is pointed out in the Bible Book of Matthew 11:12, that “From the days of John the Baptist till now, the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the violent men take it by force”.
This quote clearly explains the circumstances surrounding the creation of Rivers State which is 57 years old today.
Rivers State was created on May 27, 1967 from the genuine agitation of the founding fathers during the reign of General Yakubu Gowon (rtd) as Nigeria’s Head of State.
Fear of domination by the so called major tribes ,Hausa/Fulani, Yoruba and Igbo which culminated into regional governance led to state creation movements.
In other words, the creation of Rivers State among the 12 -State- structure took several stages before it was done.
Ben Naanen (2002), pages 340 to 350 in Ebiegbei Joe Alagoa and Abi Derefaka in the book entitled “The Land and People of Rivers State Eastern Niger Delta” sheds more light on how this feat was achieved.
According to him, the struggle for ethnic hegemony has been linked to the formation of Pan Ethnic Union from the 1920s.
Prof Ben Naanen emphasised that ethnic movement took the form of cultural and welfare associations before assuming political status when party politics started in Nigeria.
It is noteworthy that Jamil Mutanen Arewa also known as Northern People’s Congress (NPC) was founded in 1949, Egbe Omo Oduduwa was formed in 1951 and constituted the nucleus of Action Group while the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroon was inaugurated in 1944 and the Igbos in Lagos dominated NCNC party.
It would be recalled that Rivers State was part of Eastern Nigeria.
It is on record that the first attempt to establish Old Rivers State was in 1947 when Rivers Province was created which was to comprise Ahoada, Brass, Degema, Ogoni with Port Harcourt as headquarters.
It is pertinent to list Chief Harold Wilcox who later changed his name to Harold Dappa Briye, Chief D. Davies Manuel and Chief Francis Alagoa, among others.
Those who equally signed Rivers Leaders of Thought document were S.N Dikibo, E.N. Kobani, representing Ogoni Division, Doctor I.J.M Fiberesima (Degema), R.G. Okara representing Brass Division, G.B.C. Otoko, Opobo Division and N. Wonodi, Ahoada and Port Harcourt.
This does not undermine the contributions of Dr Obi Wali and environmentalist, Ken Saro-Wiwa.
These leaders painstakingly underwent shame and insult to negotiate the State creation.
Interestingly, the creation of Rivers State was not an act of benevolence but an act of commitment, dedication and continued genuine agitation.
As the State marks 56 years, Rivers people must salute the courage of the founding fathers who united despite their differences to fight for the state creation.
There were words of discouragement from prominent Igbo leaders including Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe and Akanu Ibiam.
For Odumegu Chukwuemeka Ojukwu, he tasked Rivers leaders to renege on state creation, assuring them that Port Harcourt province would be created in place of Rivers State.
When it was obvious that Igbo leaders, did not support State Creation Movement, Rivers elites switched loyalty and allegiance to the Northern leaders who also displayed double standard but agreed to a-12-State structure to balkanise the defunct Eastern Region ahead of the looming Civil War.
All that is history now, what is necessary is to build on the vision, unity of purpose and the foundation laid by the founding fathers.
As we retrospect Rivers State at 56: the Journey so far, it is also pertinent to reflect on the vision and the sense of mission of the founding fathers and such bond of unity which characterised the struggle.
This is so because lenders of the State seem to have derailed in forgiving love, and commonality of brotherhood which were hallmarks of the struggle.
Without gainsaying, what is happening in recent times is not a true reflection of what the founding fathers of the State stood for, which is why a rethink is necessary.
Fifty-six years of Statehood, Rivers people seem more divided and more ethnocentric than they were during the period under review.
It is therefore apt for leaders to find common grounds and pursue issues of justice equity and fairness which were virtues past leaders fought for in a bid to have all-inclusiveness in leadership and benefits of the State.
Navy Commodore, Alfred Diete Spiff was the pioneer Military Governor of Rivers State who truly resumed duty after an interregnum arising from the Civil War.
The Diete Spiff administration appointed and recruited seasoned academics, administrators and technocrats to join in the task of building the nascent State particularly after the civil war.
Elder Pikibo Daniel Oju Pikibo was appointed Secretary to State Government, while Professor Isaac Denma was appointed Chairman of the Civil Service Commission who was given the liberty to go to any part of the world to interview suitably qualified Rivers professionals for employment.
The crop of the experts employed were engaged as teaching staff of Rivers State College of Science and Technology (RSCST) in 1970 which was used to produce middle manpower and prepare students for the 1970 London GCE, Test of English Language as Foreign Language and other foreign examinations.
Rivers State College of Science and Technology was transformed into Rivers State University of Science and Technology by the administration of Chief Melford Okilo in 1980 while Governor Nyesom Wike amended the Law of RSUST to change it to Rivers State University to offer any course of study it can since 2017.
Similary, there was transparent award of international scholarships based on merit and not favouritism and godfatherism.
The Diete-Spiff regime also embarked on establishment of state media outfits comprising the Nigerian Tide, now The Tide in 1971 followed by the Rivers State Broadcasting Corporation which was originally the umbrella for Rivers State Broadcasting Corporation – TV and Radio Rivers to promote favourable identity of Rivers people, inter-alia.
Among development projects, there is the need to revive Rivers Readers Project which Late Kay Williams and Professor Emeritus E.J. Alagoa introduced to the government of Diete-Spiff as well as resuscitated technical schools in Port Harcourt, Tombia and craft centres for job creation.
Rivers State Government should make public secondary schools in the state work for the overall good of all.
Most importantly, government should reward civil servants through the payment of gratuity and pension for them not to regret serving the state. The leaders in positions of trust should be careful with their choice of words and public communication so as not to ignite ethnic crises.

By: Baridorn Sika
Sika, is a Port Harcourt-based journalist and public affairs analyst.

Opinion

Monthly Environmental Sanitation Imperative

Published

1 day ago

May 18, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “A clean environment is not a government gift; it is a civic duty that protects our health, preserves our cities, and reflects our national character.”

For many Nigerians who grew up in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, the last Saturday of every month followed a familiar pattern. Roads were deserted, markets closed, and residents swept compounds, cleared gutters, cut overgrown weeds, and disposed off refuse. The monthly environmental sanitation exercise became a national ritual that promoted cleanliness, discipline, and civic responsibility. As an environment correspondent about two decades ago, I joined officials of the Rivers State Ministry of Environment on sanitation monitoring tours across Port Harcourt and surrounding communities. Although enforcement officers were sometimes accused of excesses, the exercise succeeded in creating public awareness about the importance of keeping our surroundings clean. Over time, however, the practice faded away in many states.

In its absence, indiscriminate dumping of refuse, blocked drainages and environmental neglect became increasingly common. Today, heaps of waste line roads, markets and motor parks, while gutters clogged with plastics contribute to perennial flooding. Given the mounting environmental challenges facing Nigerian cities, there is no better time to revive environmental sanitation. Its return is no longer a matter of nostalgia; it is a practical necessity for public health, environmental safety, and sustainable development. Poor sanitation remains a major cause of disease. Stagnant water and uncollected waste create breeding grounds for mosquitoes, flies and rodents, increasing the risk of malaria, cholera, typhoid and other infections. Floodwaters contaminated by refuse also expose communities to serious health hazards.

Rapid urbanisation has worsened the situation. Cities such as Lagos, Port Harcourt and Abuja are expanding faster than their waste management systems can cope. As populations grow, so does the volume of waste generated daily. Monthly sanitation exercises can help rebuild environmental consciousness. Beyond cleaning streets, they remind citizens that environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. They also offer an opportunity to educate children and young people about hygiene, public health and community participation. Critics argue that the old sanitation policy restricted movement and was sometimes abused by security personnel. Those concerns were valid, but they do not invalidate the concept itself. Rather than abandon it, governments should reform the programme to make it more humane, participatory and transparent.

That is why the recent decision by the Lagos State Government to reintroduce monthly sanitation deserves commendation. Even if participation is largely voluntary, the move sends a strong signal that environmental responsibility must be taken seriously. Other states should emulate this initiative. In Rivers State, the Rivers State Waste Management Agency has intensified efforts to improve waste collection and restore Port Harcourt’s reputation as the Garden City. Reintroducing monthly sanitation would complement these efforts and deepen public involvement. At the federal level, policies such as the Digital Waste Marketplace, the Plastic Waste Policy and the National Waste Management Network are commendable. However, environmental sanitation remains one of the most direct and visible ways to mobilise citizens toward cleaner communities.

The exercise, however, must be supported by efficient waste management infrastructure. Citizens cannot be expected to maintain clean surroundings if there are inadequate waste bins, irregular refuse collection, and limited recycling facilities. Governments at all levels should invest in modern waste management systems, properly fund sanitation agencies, and promote recycling programmes. Waste sorting should become standard practice to reduce the volume of refuse ending up in landfills and drainage channels. Countries such as Singapore, Sweden and South Korea have demonstrated that waste can become a valuable economic resource. Recycling industries in these countries create jobs while protecting the environment. Nigeria can adopt similar strategies and turn waste into wealth.

Environmental laws must also be enforced consistently. Regulations against illegal dumping exist in many states but are rarely implemented. Offenders should face penalties, but enforcement must be fair and free from extortion. Urban planning is another critical factor. Poor drainage systems, overcrowding and inadequate sewage infrastructure worsen sanitation problems. Governments must prioritise road construction, drainage maintenance and orderly urban development. Markets deserve particular attention. They generate enormous quantities of waste every day, yet many lack organised disposal systems. Local councils and market associations should work together to establish effective waste collection arrangements in commercial centres. Religious institutions, schools, traditional rulers and civil society groups also have important roles to play.

Environmental responsibility should be taught and reinforced as a social value. Community leaders can help change attitudes by consistently promoting cleaner habits. This issue is even more urgent in an era of climate change. Flooding, erosion and extreme weather events are already threatening many Nigerian communities. Poor waste disposal worsens these challenges by blocking waterways and reducing urban resilience. A clean environment also offers economic benefits. Well-maintained cities attract investors, tourists and businesses. Reduced disease outbreaks lower healthcare costs and improve productivity among workers and students. More importantly, cleanliness reflects national values. A nation that allows public spaces to deteriorate projects an image of disorder and neglect. Nigerians deserve cleaner streets, healthier neighbourhoods and safer communities.

Reviving environmental sanitation will not solve all environmental problems overnight, but it can serve as a powerful starting point. Combined with effective waste management, public education and stronger infrastructure, it can restore environmental consciousness across the country. Ultimately, environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. Government must provide leadership, infrastructure and enforcement, while citizens must demonstrate discipline and civic commitment. From disposing of household waste properly to keeping drains free of obstruction, every Nigerian has a role to play. If Nigeria is serious about protecting public health, reducing flooding and building livable cities, the return of monthly environmental sanitation is a step whose time has come.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

God’s Intentionality in Ecological System

Published

1 day ago

May 18, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole”.

From the very first chapter of Scripture, the Bible presents a profound truth: creation was not accidental, random, or without meaning. The universe emerged from the deliberate counsel of an all-wise God who fashioned every aspect of life with purpose and precision. The heavens were stretched out by His command, the earth was carefully positioned, the seas were bounded, and every living creature was assigned a distinct role within a perfectly coordinated ecological system. When God surveyed His completed work, He pronounced it “very good,” affirming that creation was whole, harmonious, and exactly as He intended. The natural world remains a visible testimony to God’s intentionality. The sun provides warmth and energy at the right intensity to sustain life. The moon governs tides and seasons. Trees absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen.

Rivers irrigate the land and quench thirst. Bees and butterflies pollinate crops. Birds disperse seeds. Animals maintain biodiversity. Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole. Nothing was made without significance, and nothing was left to chance. Among all created beings, humanity occupies a unique and privileged position. Unlike plants and animals, man was created in the image and likeness of God. This divine imprint endowed human beings with intelligence, moral consciousness, creativity, and the capacity for relationship with their maker. It also established mankind as the steward of creation. God granted humanity dominion over the earth, not as a license for reckless exploitation, but as a sacred trust to cultivate, protect, and preserve the world He had declared good.

Dominion, in God’s original intention, was to be exercised with wisdom, compassion, and responsibility. Human beings were meant to care for the land, use natural resources judiciously, and ensure that all forms of life flourished in accordance with divine order. The earth was to be managed as a trust from God, not plundered for selfish gain. Unfortunately, this divine mandate has been grossly misunderstood and widely abused. It is deeply regrettable that man has deviated so drastically from God’s original intention. Instead of stewardship, humanity has too often embraced greed. Instead of preservation, there has been exploitation. Instead of gratitude to the Creator, there has been reckless consumption and abuse of the environment. Across the world, forests are felled indiscriminately, rivers are contaminated, and fertile lands are stripped of their productivity.

Species disappear as habitats are destroyed. Air pollution threatens public health, and climate change disrupts weather patterns and livelihoods. What God created as a life-supporting ecosystem is increasingly treated as a disposable commodity. In Nigeria, the consequences are especially painful. Oil spills in the Niger Delta have devastated farmlands, poisoned rivers, and destroyed fishing communities. Poor waste management clogs drains and contributes to flooding. Erosion eats away homes and roads. Illegal mining and logging scar the landscape. In many cases, communities suffer while those responsible evade justice. At the root of much of this destruction is corruption. Funds earmarked for environmental protection, sanitation, and erosion control are often diverted for personal enrichment. Regulatory agencies are compromised through bribery.

Powerful individuals and corporations place profit above human welfare. Corruption thus becomes not only a moral failure but an assault on God’s creation. This environmental abuse is also a tragic expression of man’s inhumanity to man. When water is polluted, children fall sick. When farmlands are destroyed, farmers lose their means of survival. When rivers are contaminated, fishermen are plunged into poverty. When floods and erosion displace families, communities are torn apart. The burden of environmental degradation falls most heavily on the poor and vulnerable, while future generations inherit a diminished world. Yet, despite humanity’s failures, there remains hope for restoration. God’s purpose for creation has not changed. He still calls His people to responsible stewardship and righteous living. When individuals and nations return to God’s principles, they begin to view the earth not as an object to exploit, but as a sacred trust to preserve.

Responsible stewardship means protecting natural resources, planting trees, reducing pollution, disposing of waste properly, enforcing environmental laws, rejecting corruption, and treating others with justice and compassion. It requires governments to act with integrity, businesses to operate ethically, faith communities to teach creation care, and citizens to take personal responsibility for the environment. Creation care is therefore more than an environmental concern; it is a spiritual obligation. Our treatment of the earth and of one another reflects the sincerity of our reverence for God. To exploit nature, oppress the vulnerable, and enrich ourselves through corruption is to rebel against His purpose. To protect creation and uphold justice is to honor the Creator and participate in His original design. The world God made was declared “very good.” It is our solemn duty to ensure that our actions preserve rather than destroy that goodness.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

Confronting National Development In Chinese Style

Published

6 days ago

May 13, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “China’s rise was not a miracle. It was the result of deliberate planning, disciplined execution, and a national determination to make poverty reduction the foundation of national development.”

A short TikTok video by @ancientchinaforever recently offered a compelling summary of China’s remarkable transformation from one of the world’s poorest nations to a global economic powerhouse. In just a few minutes, it captured a lesson that developing countries like Nigeria cannot afford to ignore: meaningful development does not happen by chance. It is the product of vision, consistency, and a deliberate commitment to confronting poverty. In 1981, according to the World Bank, nearly 88 percent of China’s population lived in extreme poverty. The country was overwhelmingly rural, industrially weak, and lacking in modern infrastructure. Millions of people had limited access to quality healthcare, education, and basic social services. Yet China refused to accept poverty as its destiny. Its leaders made a strategic decision to treat poverty reduction as the starting point of national development.

Rather than relying on slogans or isolated welfare programmes, they created a coordinated system that mobilised government institutions at every level toward one overriding goal: improving the living conditions of ordinary citizens.

This was the turning point in China’s history. Poverty alleviation became a national mission. Clear targets were established, responsibilities were assigned to provincial and local governments, and officials were evaluated based on measurable results. Data was used to identify poor households, monitor progress, and adjust strategies where necessary.In effect, China built what may be described as a national development machine.The first major reforms focused on agriculture. Through the household responsibility system, farmers were given greater control over their land and allowed to sell surplus produce after meeting government quotas.

This policy created incentives for productivity and innovation. The results were dramatic. Agricultural output rose significantly, rural incomes increased, and millions were lifted out of poverty.With food security improving, China turned to industrialisation. The government established Special Economic Zones, most notably in Shenzhen, to attract foreign investment and promote export-driven manufacturing. What was once a small fishing community quickly transformed into one of the world’s leading industrial and technology hubs. Factories created millions of jobs, drawing workers from rural areas into expanding urban centres. China soon became the manufacturing capital of the world, producing electronics, textiles, machinery, and consumer goods for global markets.The revenue generated from industrial growth was reinvested in infrastructure and human development.

China understood that development requires more than factories. It demands modern infrastructure that connects people, goods, and markets. Massive investments were made in roads, railways, airports, seaports, electricity, and telecommunications.

Today, China’s high-speed rail system, modern cities, and efficient logistics networks stand as visible proof of decades of purposeful investment. Equally important was China’s commitment to education and healthcare.Schools were expanded, literacy improved, and vocational training equipped workers with the skills needed in a modern economy. Healthcare reforms reduced preventable diseases and protected families from being pushed deeper into poverty by medical costs.These investments ensured that economic growth translated into tangible improvements in living standards.

Another defining feature of China’s development model was policy continuity. Through successive Five-Year Plans, national priorities were clearly outlined and pursued over decades. While leaders changed, the core development agenda remained consistent. This stability encouraged investment, strengthened institutions, and allowed long-term projects to be completed. Unlike countries where each administration abandons the policies of its predecessor, China sustained a clear sense of direction.The results have been extraordinary. According to the World Bank, China has lifted more than 800 million people out of extreme poverty—the largest poverty reduction effort in human history. A broad middle class has emerged, and the country has become the world’s second-largest economy. Chinese companies such as Huawei Technologies and Alibaba Group now compete at the forefront of global innovation.

China’s journey has not been without challenges. Rapid industrialisation has contributed to environmental degradation, regional disparities, and demographic pressures. However, these challenges do not diminish the scale of its achievement. They underscore the complexity of transforming a nation of over one billion people. For Nigeria, China’s experience offers valuable lessons. First, poverty reduction must be treated as a strategic national priority rather than a campaign promise. Second, development requires long-term planning and policy continuity. Third, sustained investment in agriculture, infrastructure, education, and healthcare is essential. Fourth, institutions must be strengthened to ensure accountability and measurable outcomes. Finally, leadership must combine vision with disciplined execution. Nigeria is richly endowed with natural resources, entrepreneurial talent, and a youthful population.

What remains missing is a coherent and consistent development strategy that places national interest above politics. China’s transformation demonstrates that development is not a matter of luck. It is the outcome of clear priorities, effective institutions, and unwavering commitment. For countries still grappling with poverty and underdevelopment, China stands as compelling proof that when a nation confronts its challenges with strategic intent and collective discipline, extraordinary progress is possible.

Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi