Editorial
Another Feather In Mary Odili’s Cap
Justice Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili, a retired Supreme Court judge, has recently been in the news for all the
right reasons. She was confirmed as the 51st Chairperson of the Body of Benchers, succeeding Wole Olanipekun, SAN, who took office as the 50th chairman in March 2022 and became vice-chairman on March 30, 2021.
Justice Peter-Odili has an impeccable judicial record and possesses all the qualities of an excellent judge, including judicial temperament, intelligence, morals, courage, integrity, experience, and education. We congratulate her on her elevation and hope she draws strength, wisdom and experience from the Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, who himself is a lifelong Bencher.
The Nigerian Body of Benchers is a professional body concerned with the admission of successful candidates at the Nigerian Law School Bar Final Examination into the legal profession. Members of the body are called Benchers. The body also regulates the call of graduates of law school to the Nigerian Bar, as well as the regulation of the legal profession in the country.
Without doubt, Peter-Odili’s appointment constitutes a perfect key to a greater development of legal jurisprudence and dispensation of justice in Nigeria. It will fetch the Body a new synergy and strengthen the principles of the legal organisation. Her contributions to Nigerian jurisprudence are so outstanding that they have continued to elicit accolades among legal practitioners.
Justice Peter-Odili’s service and the fecundity of her jurisprudential knowledge have continued to give unquantifiable boosts to the legal profession, not only in Nigeria but also across Africa. We can truly describe her emergence as putting a square peg in a square hole. It is a demonstration of true merit such that an author, Amit Kalantri, says, “It is like steel and not like cotton, that seems small from the outside but weighs heavy on the inside.”
Mary retired from the Supreme Court last year as the first woman from Rivers State to be elevated to the apex court in Nigeria. She was appointed to the court to fill the vacancy created by Justice Nikki Tobi’s retirement. In appreciation of her exemplary service, Governor Wike built a judicial training institute, saddled with the responsibility of training judges and magistrates, in her honour.
The eminent jurist is the wife of Dr Peter Odili who served as Governor of Rivers State from 1999 to 2007. While serving as the First Lady, her Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), The Adolescent Programme (TAP), trained several youths and women in the state on various skills and provided them with starter packs to make them self-reliant and productive. She has not only proven her mettle in her chosen carrier, but she is also a quintessential wife and mother.
Given her professional orbit and all-embracing knowledge of the Nigerian judicial system, her tenure in her new-found position will be a remarkable success. Because she is a titan in the legal profession, who has contributed to the ideological conduct of legal professionals through great works, enviable comportment and unbending principles, the Body of Benchers cannot be in better hands.
Beyond her appointment as chairperson of the organisation, she must start strongly, particularly as her tenure will last for only a year. We urge her not to lose sight of the unpleasant happenings bedevilling the legal job. The profession is under attack and aggression. Members of the Body of Benchers must join hands with her to identify and address the myriad of challenges facing the Nigerian legal occupation currently.
The vulnerabilities that have been noticed and exposed in the legal carrier are disturbing. Peter-Odili’s appointment provides the opportunity for deep introspection and self-assessment. The Benchers must make efforts to ensure that the practice of the legal occupation and the courts always measure up to the moral, ethical and statutory standards they subscribe to.
Legal education is crucial; any neglect would amount to a fatal consequence in the entire process of justice adjudication. However, the state of legal education in Nigeria is regrettable. It is far from the international standard. This is taking its toll on the entire system of justice administration at every step of our journey as a nation. The development has always been reflected in the quality of lawyers in our nation.
Consequently, the Body must take tough steps and end poor funding of legal education. Successive governments are guilty of this. This case of clear neglect on the side of the government has kept legal education in stagnation for years. Shamefully, no faculty of law in Nigeria has modern facilities to train a 21st-century lawyer. The traditional method of bombarding students with notes and handouts is still in place, slowing the pace of learning.
Also, the proliferation of law faculties is another factor militating against legal education in Nigeria. The more law faculties we have, the more substandard. In 1962, there were four faculties of law in the country and one Nigerian law school located in Lagos. Today, over fifty law faculties exist in federal, state, and private universities. This results in a monumental disproportionate student–lecturer ratio.
Likewise, the law school curriculum remains the same. This hinders innovation that could have repositioned legal research and the industry as a whole. The obsolete programmes offered by the various law schools in Nigeria also persist and largely unimproved, thus leaving students in an uncongenial academic predicament.
Indeed, the challenges facing legal education and the legal profession in the country are considerable. Justice Peter-Odili and her team of Benchers must pull out all the stops to salvage a dangerous situation. Where necessary, pressure should be brought to bear on relevant stakeholders and the government to prevent our “legal ship” from sinking entirely.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
