Opinion
Electronic Accreditation And Transmission
The year 2023 will be a twilight year for most politicians in Nigeria. It will indeed mark the beginning of the end for a lot of incompetent and rogue politicians who ascended power through the barrel of guns wielded by thugs. It will also end the idea of money for a vote. This would not have been possible without President Muhammadu Buhari’s signature on the Electoral Bill. Even though Buhari declined to sign the electoral bill five times in the past, his actions last week have given hope to every Nigerian who loves democracy and free-and-fair elections.
There were already theories why President Buhari may not sign the bill, but he eventually came, putting all the conspiracy theories to rest; even though he made a strong appeal that the provisions of Clause 84 are amended to allow public servants, political officeholders, and advisers to remain in position even if they are contesting electoral offices. By signing the bill, he has in a sense, saved the 2023 General Election and, by so doing, given hope to the electorate. The bill is not perfect, and no bill is, but it is a major effort in taking us closer to a place in our democratic journey.
The National Assembly in their wisdom inserted Clause 84 in the Electoral Act, I think, with the good intention of creating a level playing field for all. Even civil servants have to resign their appointments to vie for political offices, relinquishing any advantage their position might afford them. We must remember that what is good for the goose is sauce for the gander. What are these ministers, commissioners, and special advisers afraid of? They should resign and contest with others on an equal footing. So long as these new provisions in Clause 84 are in line with the constitution, the National Assembly must stand firm; but if otherwise, they should do the President’s bidding.
We should be thanking a coalition of 26 civil society organisations (CSOs) for mounting pressure on the President. One CSO, Enough is Enough, went as far as publishing an advertorial in a national daily, clarifying to the President that his assent does not preclude further amendment on the bill when signed into law. Aside from the CSOs, the voice of Nigerians across all political spectrum was resounded loudly. So far, this is one legacy of the Buhari administration after almost seven years. But, it is a legacy that can make all the difference, since it deals with the selection of those whose duty it is to make decisions on our behalf.
The most momentous provisions of the act are the electronic accreditation and electronic transmission of election results. Other items in the act are very important, but these two items alone make a great deal of difference. Clause 47 provides for the electronic accreditation of voters, meaning that every voter in every unit across the country can see real-time, how many people are in the polling units. It will become a major deterrent against ballot box snatching; and other forms of violence at polling units.
On the other hand, Clause 50 which deals with the electronic transmission of results has always been contentious, but would now form the fulcrum of a credible election, come 2023. The country now has a veritable tool to decide choose the feature. A tool that would reduce inaccuracies of results to the barest minimum. It would ensure that the votes of ordinary people count, and also reduce election violence perpetrated by desperate politicians. Also, one key benefit of electronic voting is the fact that results can be independently collated at the end of the election.
The effects of these two clauses are enough to change our politics in very many ways. It will create a level playing field for all parties, whether big or small; and as a result, the party in power would understand in clear terms that they have just been served an advance notice by the electorate, saying, perform or prepare to leave, come 2023. Incompetent politicians are already on their way out, and most of them who have turned the National Assembly chambers into a place to enjoy mid-morning and afternoon naps should now retire honourably or get ready to be sent packing in 2023.
By finally signing this bill into law, President Buhari has restored power to the people. People can now trust the electioneering process to work, knowing that in the next election cycle they would speak with their vote. It will also force Nigerians to ask politicians the hard question that bears on the position they seek to occupy. Politicians must now deliver on their promises with the mind that there is indeed a day of reckoning, and it’s no longer business as usual. Political parties would also be careful in making choices of their flag bearers at various levels.
This act also opens up the political space for those who hitherto were afraid of joining politics due to the premonition that the outcomes were already predetermined. This is a very good thing since the same set of people has ruled us since 1999. It will give the electorate options; thereby compelling candidates to compete in the market of ideas for a place in the hearts of would-be voters. Voters, on the other hand, will choose any candidate of their choice knowing that there is a chance for them in this era of electronic voting.
It is the period of the underdog. A time any party with the right candidate can win. Parties no longer have to be as big as APC or PDP to win elections. With electronic accreditation and transmission, parties can be lean and still win elections. It only boils down to credible candidates, the right message, good campaign structure, and hard work. Small parties do not chase big positions; they only need to build from small positions to gather the momentum necessary for building the critical mass required for contesting big positions. It might take time, but it is possible. Nigerians should begin to dust their permanent voter’s cards because come 2023 there must be a political paradigm shift in this country.
By: Raphael Pepple
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
