Any Nigerian with a deep inner perceptive capacity would appreciate the early warning signal or whistle blown by a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Dr Obadiah Mailafia. For saying what he did with regards to the Boko Haram and herdsmen enigma, a radio station which carried his view was fined N5 million under the Hate Speech law. He was also invited for a chat by the Department of State Services (DSS). In a recent interview with newsmen he was quoted as saying: “The fact that I am outraged by all the killings and genocide doesn’t make me a radical”.
Maybe our security operatives are more interested in smoking out radicals who raise alarm over the state of insecurity in the country, than they are in those who terrorise people in pursuit of some hidden agenda. No doubt, the security situation in Nigeria is becoming such an enigma that some Nigerians rarely have confidence in the nation’s security apparatus. Rather, the unexpressed opinion of many people is that some groups and organizations are seeking for some radical changes in Nigeria through unconstitutional means. To allow religious sentiments to undermine democratic ideals would be to place stability in jeopardy.
What we can learn from the defunct apartheid policy as practised in old South Africa is that while it is natural for “birds of same feather” to be together, fortune hunters become predators under the guise of political unity. In the Nigerian situation, there is a suspicion of some hidden agenda, fuelling and spreading insecurity, with Boko Haram, ISWAP, herdsmen, etc, serving as harbingers of the shape of things to come. While vigilante groups in some parts of the country are being asked to surrender fire arms in their possession, no such policy affects Boko Haram, ISWAP and herdsmen who carry intimidating weapons. Obviously, suspicion would incline towards some religious undertone!
Ranging from marriages, political groupings, to other relationships and interactions, being “unevenly yoked together” is a foundation for instability and failure. There are fundamental differences and inequalities among human beings and people feel more at home in the midst of their own kinds. Individual identity, peculiarities and uniqueness derive from culture and environment of origin which are not arbitrary but natural. In spite of individual differences, there are usually points of mutual understanding and cooperation.
Important in Mailafia’s recent interview is the fact that “peace is impossible without justice in human associations and interactions. His opinion that “a state governor” is a commander of the marauding Boko Haram terrorists, demands to be looked into by an impartial and professional security outfit. Often, in our intolerance and conceit, we tend to believe that others must be like us, or see things the way that we do. Neither should unity be misconstrued as uniformity. The essence of democracy is freedom to choose and to be ourselves, while holding on to what values that we extol as individuals. But a situation of compulsion of choice or value is dictatorship.
Nation-building demands that already existing foundations must form the basis of mutual interactions, without destroying one, to support another. It is in the ability to manage diversities and differences rather than widen them for political purposes, which makes an astute statesman. What we find is that groups of people who benefit from parasitic political arrangements would hardly allow changes which would deprive them of such unjust advantage. Thus unending agitations and insecurity would continue to brew in society.
The pattern of insecurity in Nigeria, with special reference to Boko Haram phenomenon, points towards a sustained, clandestine sponsorship, for political purposes. Whatever may be the possible political purposes, suspicion goes towards unjust imposition of unconstitutional arrangements in the country. It is quite unethical and retrogressive to suppress one man’s ability or freedom in an attempt to boost the position of another. Neither should a nation tolerate ruthless struggles and acts of terrorism for political, religious or economic exploitation of one group by another.
Progress shows itself in the improvement of what already exists, rather than suppress what some one else has, by intimidation. People who seek for a separate existence from where they feel unwanted or marginalised and exploited usually have some moral justification for their demand. Similarly, those who resort to terrorism in their demands must have some reasons for choosing the path of violence. In the case of Boko Haram terrorists, their demands are not made clear.
Suppression is as unnatural as oppression is a ready tool to deal with unreasonable demands. The price which a nation can pay for suppression and oppression can entail unexpected surprises. It is for the avoidance of such unexpected surprises that Mailafia raised an alarm, saying “Nigeria ‘ll die if we all keep quiet” (Ref. The Tide newspaper, Friday, Aug. 28, 2020.
Despite all human shenanigans and cunning, nature demands that all dues be rendered to their exact owners. When such restitution and balancing are not brought about early enough and peacefully, what follows next is usually a disaster. Much have been said about the state of instability and insecurity in Nigeria. There have been calls for a thorough overhaul and changes in the nation’s security system. Perhaps, not many Nigerians would have far-reaching perceptive capacity to foresee the shape of things to come.
What Mailafia did in raising an alarm or blowing a whistle is an act of patriotism. Like he said, his name, Mailafia, means a man of peace. There are other Nigerians who foresee a possible assault on the peace and security of the nation. To use religion to seek political ends can place a nation in a prolonged state of insecurity. Logical evidence point towards this possibility. Nowhere in history has blood sustained power.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Bright Amirize