Opinion
Any End To Police Brutality In Nigeria?
In the organization of any society where law and order are expected to prevail unrestrained, the police force for sure, remains a critical institution. To this end, through the Police Act, the Nigeria Police Force was conferred with a wide range of powers with which to function effectively.
Away from its primary role of maintaining peace and order, Nigeria Police, as a law enforcement agency, is fundamentally established to protect the lives and properties of citizens.This basic humanitarian role of the force, literally makes its members, friends of the people as it takes only a friend to protect another. This, the writer suspects, may have informed the forces’s motto/slogan that became very prominent in the 80’s and 90’s; “Police Is Your Friend”.
As a growing child back in the 90’s, the slogan: “Police Is Your Friend”, was posted on every police formation, division, post and command. Of course, at this point, human beings went about their businesses feeling quite secure with the presence of police officers in and around their neighbourhood.
But that atmosphare seems to have been lost with the passage of time. From the foregoing, that air of friendship seems to have long been thrown overboard as the officers themselves careless about giving meaning to such claim in the delivery of their duty.
All that is visible is unrestrained abuse of a folk supposed to be protected by certain officers of the force thus leading to a general distrust among the public. The powers conferred on the Nigeria Police, as vast and wide and as it appears, is now used against the public, for no obvious reasons.
Successive Inspectors General of Police have left no stone unturned, in their bid to press home the force’s claim of friendship to all. From time to time, efforts are geared towards laundering the image of the police so as to gain the masses’ goodwill and acceptance.
Unfortunately, the more the top hierarchy of the police tries to project the police in a good light, the wider the gap between the latter’s attitude and the expectations of the former. However, the writer is still at loss, as to how realistic that could be in an environment that does not hold the police accountable for their actions and expression of unreasonable force.
In spite of the fact that citizens are constitutionally entitled to the right to be protected by their police and are guaranteed by the highest law of the land, some of these officers make it a duty to deprive citizens of their rights.
According to Ademola Orunbon, a columnist, “the police brazenly encroach and abuse the right of the people with impunity while the rule of law is thrown to the dogs. They unleash injustice on innocent poor and law-abiding citizens of this country without resistance”, and woe betides any one who dares to challenge them.
The average citizen and residents of Nigeria have had, at least, one run-in with our Police force and view them with a certain degree of wariness and distrust. Regrettably, a lot of people erroneously think they have no rights against the police while they perform their duties.This is not true.
“Most Nigerians have erroneously made their lives so vulnerable to all sorts that some corrupt policemen capitalize on their ignorance to unleash terror on them. The powers conferred on the police by the law are meant to protect the citizens and not bully them. This is one of the services we pay taxes for,” Ademola Orunbon maintained .
Despite the wide powers conferred upon the police, the average Nigerian still retains certain rights the police cannot ignore. Luckily, the 1999 Constitution grants the right to dignity of human person which prohibits anyone from being tortured into making a statement or confession by the police.
Thus, no matter the harassment or the offence one is accused of, Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction. Denial of this right is tantamount to a violation of rights.
The trending news of the “Ikoku 4” is a case in hand. The death of Chima Ikunado, the latest victim of police brutality in Port Harcourt, could well be described as an eye opener to the avalanche of other inhumane cases perpetrated by the Nigeria Police but swept under the carpet.
Unfolding events between the police and the subjects they are commissioned to protect, tend to paint the force with a jaded reputation. Corruption aside, could it be said that the police is loaded with indisciplined illiterates bereft of the knowledge of their key-job responsibilities, or is the force now a rallying point for sadists and frustrated individuals?
This is no longer funny. One cannot fathom where a female police officer derived the gut to allegedly castrate an ordinary suspect in a bid to force him against his will. If a female officer could express this height of wickedness, what will be expected of her male colleagues? May God deliver Nigeria.
Time without number, the media had been inundated with news of police killing cyclists and drivers over a paltry sum of twenty naira and a hundred naira. Regrettably, the police leadership had never gone beyond the point of making hypocritical public statements of bringing the culprits to book and allowing the full weight of the law to fall on them.
They tactfully incarcerate the culprits to take away the public’s attention so they (the culprits) could be freed eventually. This attitude does not make for a healthy policing. And this accounts for why the police in Nigeria have continued to ascert a lordship posture on the Nigerian populace.
But how far can this take us? The earlier the nation launches a search into the activities of the Nigeria police in the discharge of their statutory duties with a view to unraveling the reasons behind their unreasonable use of force, the better.
The writer has keenly followed developments in the case of the “Ikoku 4”, and in her view, the time is ripe to start holding the police accountable for their actions and expression of unreasonable force. The late Chima should be a price Nigerians have paid to free themselves from the evil claws of the Nigeria police’s brutality.
The public’s outcry for justice should not be seen as a call for vengeance, no, but one targeted at righting the wrong to save our environment for posterity. Remember, today it is Chima, who knows, tomorrow it may be Olayinka or Tijani.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
