Editorial
Military Invasion Of Daily Trust
The January 6 invasion of Daily Trust Newspaper offices in Maiduguri, Lagos and Abuja by the military over the newspaper’s lead story on its Sunday publication is déjà vu. Even worse was the arrest and detention of the Northern Regional Editor of the newspaper, Uthman Abubakar. It is a sad reminder of the era of jackal when civility was an anathema.
We recall that several instances of this autocratic tendency had featured under the present administration. Prominent among them was last year’s invasion of the National Assembly by some elements in the Department of State Services (DSS), leading to the dismissal of the agency’s former boss, Lawal Daura.
This latest episode involving the media is a clear indication that Nigeria, in spite of its nearly 20 years of uninterrupted civilian regime, has not risen above the level of military dictatorship.
As usual, the military would find an explanation which often times points to national security to justify the invasion of Daily Trust. And indeed, it did.
According to the spokesman of the Nigerian Army, Brigadier-General Sani Usman, Daily Trust Newspaper was invaded for disclosing classified security information that amounts to a breach of national security and which runs contrary to Sections 1 and 2 of the Official Secrets Act.
This explanation may seem plausible against the backdrop of the fact that Nigeria is currently at war with insurgents in the North East. Therefore, any piece of information that could encourage the insurgents and their sponsors to up their games or possibly expose the Nigerian Army to further attacks should have been avoided by the media.
Given the already known fact that the military is over-stretched and tense, with its ranks believed to have been infiltrated by moles who leak information to the insurgents, it is fair that Daily Trust exercised caution and restraint in the piece of information it dishes out to the public. We say this because any piece of information that could make the military vulnerable endangers national security.
Notwithstanding the goof by Daily Trust, we had expected the military to resort to civil means of rebuking the newspaper, rather than the brinkmanship and show of shame displayed by its men. The Nigerian Army could have reported the excesses of Daily Trust to the Nigerian Press Council for proper sanction or, at least, seek redress in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Again, the military itself goofed by not embargoing its information. Why announce to the world that it has acquired or was going to acquire fighting helicopters? If the announcement was meant to assure Nigerians that the Army would soon be on top of the game, it was very expensive, knowing that it may encourage the insurgents and their sponsors to also up their games.
To us in The Tide, the military siege laid on Daily Trust and subsequent arrest and detention of its regional editor are unnecessary. They portend a glaring threat not just to the Press but to the nation’s democracy, especially now that the country is grappling with socio-economic instability and unfavourable human rights records.
The torrents of backlash that trailed the invasion of Daily Trust are clear proofs that Nigerians are not ready to trade the nation’s democracy for dictatorship. The criticisms should, therefore, serve as a warning to the military that Nigerians would resist any backlash on democracy or a descent to undemocratic rule.
At this period when the general elections are a month away, we expect the military and other security agencies to key into the democratic experiment by being civil in all their engagements.
We, therefore, urge President Muhammadu Buhari to rein in the military and other security agencies in the country. Whether the actions of the security agencies in trying to muscle the Press and militarilise the nation’s democracy have the direct or indirect approval of the Presidency, Buhari, as the President and Commander-In-Chief of the nation’s Armed Forces, should take full responsibility for all the actions and inactions of his men. The buck stops at his table, after all.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics1 day agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics1 day ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics1 day agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers4 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News4 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics4 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured4 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
