Editorial
Still On Nigerian Workers’ Plight
Nigerian workers joined their counterparts in the world to commemorate the May Day also known as Workers Day. The event which was low-keyed in various parts of the country evidences the economic realities facing the Nigerian state.
Workers’ Day celebration, an annual ritual to mark the struggle for better working conditions, indeed, climaxed in the actualization of an eight-hour work day as against the 10-16 hours per day witnessed in Chicago, United States of America (USA) on May 1, 1886, the date usually remembered for the emancipation, or better still, the liberalization of workers.
Ever since that epoch, May 1 of every year has become a unique event for the working class in several countries to take a deep retrospection on the struggles and well-being of workers as well as to demand for better working conditions and environment.
Scores of countries, including Nigeria usually declare May 1, every year as public holiday as a mark of respect for workers to societal development and to provide a platform for inter-face with the working class with a view to charting the way forward.
With the theme: Labour Movement In National Development: Dare to Struggle, Dare to Win, workers used the occasion to press for the implementation of a new National Minimum Wage which is long over-due by law.
At various rallies at the Federal, State and local government areas, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) Trade Union Congress (TUC) and other sister labour organizations urged the federal authorities to speedily implement a living wage for workers, against the backdrop that the current N18,000 can no longer take workers home in view of the prevailing economic realities.
While The Tide agrees no less with the position of labour, we think that leadership of labour has really lost focus as compared to the days of Micheal Imoudu, Hassan Sumonu, Adams Oshiomohle, just to name a few, who dared the authorities during their stewardship and did the needful by giving labour movement the desired mileage for workers welfare.
We recall how these veteran labour leaders kept several dispensations of government on their toes by ensuring that workers got their due entitlements and emoluments as at when due.
The situation now is entirely different as labour in Nigeria has been so politicized to the extent that leadership has lost direction and perhaps only interested in cutting corners and short-changing the system for personal gains.
Leadership lethargy has, indeed, robbed Nigerian workers of their welfare as backlog of unpaid wages and entitlements, some running into several months with labour leadership turning a blind eye over the pathetic and pitiable disposition of the worker.
It is, infact, regrettable that leadership of various labour unions in the country is so incapacitated to fight for workers welfare to the extent that leaders are in government or employers payroll in order to shut up their mouths or eyes over workers plight.
Quite frankly, the issue of new National Minimum Wage would have been over by now, if our labour leaders are vibrant and focused like some of their predecessors of old who sacrificed their personnel interests in their campaign for better package for the workers.
The Tide therefore strongly support and demand for a reasonable living wage, not the current dead wage which does not take the worker home.
We condemn in strong terms Federal Government’s foot-dragging and antics to further delay the implementation of a new wage regime for the Nigerian worker.
It is expected that labour leaders should give Federal government a time-line to implement a new wage as the current one has been made a mince meat by inflation. We expect the labour movement to be responsible and responsive and ensure that federal government keeps to its promise to implement a new wage regime by the third quarter of the year.
We are, indeed, unhappy with series of schemes employed to deliberately delay the process and labour must resist these antics geared towards further impoverishing the worker.
We totally endorse the position of NLC, TUC and others who are insisting on N66,500 minimum wage as the N18,000 wage implemented in 2011 is now unrealistic and untenable as Nigerian workers are among the least paid in the world.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
