Opinion
2017: Year Of The Debacle
As Nigerians bid farewell to 2017, the question on everyone’s lips is, how did the nation fare in the outgone year? If Nigerians are challenged to assess the President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration in 2017, how will he be evaluated? High? Average? Low?
For me and for many Nigerians, the year was veritably atrocious. The precursors are legion and unambiguous. While more persons entered the labour market, the number of people in full time employment decreased abysmally. Consequently, unemployment had tremendous increase.
Last year, the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) declared that about 272 companies in the country shut because of the depression the economy suffered. Also, the number of mendicants surged and Nigerians witnessed several cases of suicide or attempted suicide following the acute economic stagnation.
What about roads, health care and power? Surely, there were no improvements in those sectors in 2017. The power status particularly can at best be described as a flash in the pan as its performance fluctuated regularly.
Likewise it was a year the Boko Haram insurgents enhanced their efforts and unleashed pandemonium on Nigerians despite claims by the federal government that the terrorists had been severely decimated.
Furthermore, 2017 was a year when Nigerians consummated increased rate of armed robbery, kidnappings, human trafficking, etc. Unarguably, human traffickers had a field day with Nigerians who were held in slavery in Libya.
Worst of all, in 2017, Nigerian workers suffered unprecedented setbacks in many states. Workers’ salaries, promotions and incremental pay were held back because of the hideous and fiendish intentions of governors who prefer to utilize salaries on mundane matters like re-election or other political strategies.
Considering that some of the governors are hounding various political ambitions, workers’ emoluments have become the least on their agenda. Pensioners are never spared either as they are owed a huge backlog of their financial benefits by state governors and the federal government alike.
The ugly experience of workers and pensioners clearly sends the gesture that it never pays to labour or immolate for the country. Not only did workers and pensioners undergo pain in the hand of dreadful political leaders, traders did as well as they had a fair share of the grotesque deals.
Most Nigerians will never disremember last year’s hyper inflation that characterized prices of goods and services in the country. The incident took great toll on workers and businesses and compelled many traders to terminate their ventures.
According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), millions of jobs were lost in 2017. It was a year poverty, unemployment and insecurity reverberated. It is crestfallen or disconsolate that unemployment figures kept holding sway despite government’s promises to create millions of jobs in the year under review. Business domains were so dissatisfactory that copious companies relocated to Ghana and other neighbouring countries.
Additionally, 2017 was a year Nigerians observed turbulence in the labour sector. Medical doctors, general health practitioners, university lecturers and their non-teaching staff counterparts, oil and gas sector workers, all embarked on various strike actions related to working conditions.
Given the very sordid state of health care services in the country, medical tourism by politicians and non politicians alike witnessed sharp increase in the year. Doctors and nurses trooped out in search of greener pastures.
What about the outrageous fuel scarcity? It is the worst Christmas largesse Nigerians have ever had in decades. Every indication points to the fact that the federal government were obviously caught napping by the development. That is why they could neither expound the scarcity nor halt it.
Indeed, in the year under review, Nigerians experienced excruciating pains, not of their own accord, but those imposed by the country’s political leaders through their ungracefulness and bewilderment.
Curiously, this evil occurs in the face of discernible provisions like Section 14 (2) (b) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended) that “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government”. Now, can someone confirm whether the security and welfare of Nigerians were truly given priority in 2017?
Things have to change as 2018 commences. Nigerians must insist on their right to enjoy the security and good welfare provided for in the constitution. We deserve the better life our leaders savor.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
