Opinion
Checking The Prattling Culture
On September 19, 2003, Nigerians had a one-day protest by switching off their mobile phones (GSM) over a number of failed services delivered by the operators and service providers. Apart from having to pay the highest tariff in the world, the failed services included tolerating numerous network deficiencies and poor connectivity. Nigerian GSM-users complained aloud that “enough is enough of second-class services in Nigeria”.
Like the gift of mineral oil, the GSM network in Nigeria has become a liability rather than an asset, described in some quarters as “a replica of our national malaise – failure and fraud incorporated”. From road accidents, to domestic instability, GSM has contributed much in the prevalence of much havoc in Nigeria. Not long ago, a couple was given a quit notice by an angry landlord because of a housewife who caused a fire outbreak (which was put off before it could spread). The woman, “engrossed in browsing and talking on the phone, forgot that she was cooking in the kitchen”.
Indeed, browsing and talking have not only led to “forgetting what’s cooking in the kitchen,” but also children straying away from home while mothers are chatting. Not only mothers are involved in these lapses, but even domestic servants and men holding responsible and critical positions in various establishments. Among students in tertiary institutions, the use of GSM for “prattles and lewd talks” is quite disturbing, to the extent that academic work gets affected adversely.
If anyone demands to know how jobless and idle youths buy credit cards to recharge their phones, they would probably say that they have uncles and friends who can help them. But if you can eaves-drop and examine what they talk about most of the times, surely one would be full of sadness. Maybe such “uncles and friends” have so much money and love their wards, so much that they can afford to spend such money in the promotion of a prattling habit or idle talks. What a way to show concern or give help to jobless youths!
The talking plague is a national malaise which demands to be checked, because, it depicts a culture of frivolity and immaturity. People who are mature inwardly, rarely spend their time and resources to promote prattling and idle talks. Nigerians should learn to embrace a culture of dignified silence and deeper reflections. Service providers that pander to the talking plague must be smiling to their banks daily. What a great opportunistic investment!
Among other hazards connected with much talking, GSM-related talkativeness exposes individuals and a nation to several security risks. With the military out to deal with individuals who engage in “hate-speech”, it is possible that “phone tapping” and monitoring cannot be ruled out in Nigeria. A number of unsuspecting persons may talk themselves into serious problems with security agencies. Test messages and browsing should also be included in the hazards which can arise from GSM-related talkativeness. You cannot tell who is monitoring or collecting your dozzier.
GSM addicts can become so engrossed in their browsing and chatting that they forget “What is cooking on fire” or their environment and personal responsibility. Youths have been seen walking on busy roads with ear-phones on both ears and attention divided. When attention gets divided, it is easy to predict what may happen consequently. We also see talkative drivers and other road users get into dangers as a result of divided attention.
Those who talk much usually miss the opportunity of communion with the whisperings of rarefied radiations which can make contact only with minds that are not distracted by idle prattles. Let GSM talkatives remember that they talk away not only “credit” but also time and vital energy thus rendering themselves obtuse. Any nation whose citizens are given to careless and frivolous talks, can hardly develop on a positive line, but would remain a nation of prattlers whose resources, earnings and energy could flow to enrich others who spend their time thinking rather than talking.
A nation plagued with the prattling culture would always have prattlers handling its affairs while articulate, silent operators watch out for vulnerable points to prey upon. Much talking has never done any people or any nation any good. Nigerians should learn to bridle their tongues but use their brains to survey and evaluate issues.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from Rivers State University.e-mail:bamirize@yahoo.com
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
