Editorial
Bail-Out Funds: In Support Of Senate Probe
Worried by the near state of insolvency and financial bankruptcy of some states in the country, resulting to non-payment of workers salaries and pensioners’ entitlements, for a long time, the Federal Government in 2015 doled out N338 billion as bail-out funds to beneficiary states to enable them offset their indebtedness to workers and pensioners.
The N338 billion which was a part payment of N510 billion Budget Support Facility (BSF) to states was specifically tied to salaries and pensions and was granted to 27 out of 36 states of the federation to offset arrears of wages and allowances, as some of the beneficiary states owed workers between five to 12 months and several years of retirees’ allowances.
Ironically, some of the states that benefited from the Federal Government’s bail-out fund policy, diverted such funds for purposes other than what the funds were meant to achieve.
Furthermore, in 2016, the Federal Government again reeled out the second phase of the BSF, this time, a 12-month statutory loan designed to provide an immediate relief to states to meet their statutory financial obligations to their workers and retirees with a monthly disbursement of N50 billion in the first three months and N40 billion for the remaining nine months.
Similarly, in 2016, a 22-point Financial Reform Plan (FRP) which commenced in June of the same year introduced Biometric Payroll Programme aimed at ensuring an audited annual financial status and reduction of ghost workers. It also aimed at generating and enhancing internally generated revenue to salvage most states that were unable to meet up salaries and wages payment.
Despite all these measures, some states are still heavily indebted to workers and retirees. More worrisome and condemnable is the fact that some of the state governors still proclaim in the public that they are not owing their workers.
A research conducted by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) revealed that funds released by the Federal Government under its bail-out funds initiative were diverted by some governors for payment of contracts which they had interest.
It is against this backdrop that the Finance Minister, Kemi Adeosun engaged the services of eight reputable accounting firms to audit such funds by the beneficiary states and determine how such monies were utilised. Of course, she warned that defaulting states will no longer benefit from the scheme henceforth.
The Tide therefore endorses the Minister’s action and the probe by the Senate into how some state governors used the bail-out funds, despite the protest by the said governors over the legitimacy or otherwise of the Upper Chamber to institute such investigations into the affairs of the states, the second tier of government.
Our position is quite clear, especially taking into cognisance that the said funds came from federal coffers and the nation’s parliament has the statutory obligation under its over-eight functions of the legislature to know the use or misuse of federal funds.
It is, indeed, unacceptable that governors of the beneficiary states should embark on white elephant projects while their workers and pensioners die daily in abject poverty. Some of such projects do not have direct bearing on the citizenry and are used to siphon public funds for selfish considerations.
It is unimaginable for states like Osun, Nassarawa, Benue, Imo, among others that owe arrears of salaries and pensioners’ entitlements pride themselves all over the place when their workers languish in pains.
Such states should key into Governor Nyesom Wike’s policy of ensuring that workers are paid as at when due, yet his landmarks in projects execution are phenomenal, remarkable and legendary.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
