Editorial
Oyegun And Supreme Court’s Verdicts
For some days now, comments by Chairman
of the All Progressives Congress (APC),
Chief Odigie John-Oyegun on recent judgements delivered by the Supreme Court of Nigeria over some Governorship electoral cases has dominated public discourse; most of which express disappointment.
Oyegun was quoted to have said, while meeting with leaders of Rivers State APC in Abuja that, “the APC National Leadership has not neglected party leaders and supporters in Rivers State. The State has always been in the front burner of discussion and decision in the party. There is obviously something fundamentally wrong in Rivers State which needs to be investigated and addressed.
“Your visit has had a sober effect on me. This meeting will kick start urgent actions to address what went wrong. As of today, there is an attempt being made by INEC to bar us from elections in Anambra and other States. We must address these issues.
“I still find the judgement on the Rivers State Governorship election totally astonishing. There is something fundamentally wrong in the judiciary. We have lost very important resource-rich States to the PDP. No matter how crude oil prices have fallen, it is still the most important revenue earner for the country.
“I will take up your request to facilitate a meeting with the President. We will do that as soon as possible and also make it clear that there are problems which as a party, we must address.”
The Tide thinks that the APC Chairman’s outburst is avoidable and unstatesmanly. For a national figure like Oyegun a lot of restraint is expected. As an elder statesman and political leader, his tirade over the Supreme Court’s verdicts, especially, that of Rivers State is unacceptable.
Comments like this are capable of ridiculing the judiciary and fanning the embers of crisis in the country. In fact, to the extent that he asked for the rationale for the court’s verdict did not reflect the wisdom of a man of his stature.
Oyegun’s outburst is particularly unacceptable because the same court had previously given judgement in favour of his party and nobody threatened the sanctity of the judiciary. Even so, most of what influenced the new decisions were precedents created in matters that favoured his party.
Though the APC Chairman later clarified some of his comments, explaining that he did not call for the probe of the Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, that he failed to recant on his posture against the eventual judgement on Rivers State governorship election shows that he was trying to deny the obvious.
Of course, Oyegun could not have asked for the probe of the Supreme Court’s Justices, it would have been the height of leadership rascality, irresponsibility and abuse of privilege. Certainly not, when President Mohammadu Buhari is being commended by well-meaning Nigerians for not interferring in the matter and letting justice prevail.
Again, his particular interest in Rivers State and the Niger Delta smacks of apparent desperation for the resources of the region. In fact, the pain of losing Rivers State, especially because of her resources goes to confirm that they have been spoilt by the funds from Rivers and cannot have enough.
We believe that while freedom exists for comments on any court judgement, the same cannot be allowed of deliberate attempt to expose the judiciary to ridicule. In fact, the personality involved and the issues raised can be sensitive.
The suggestion by Oyegun is that the Supreme Court cannot be seen as fair and dependable. He however, did not say whose views on this matter should prevail or be respected. It is common knowledge that when people submit themselves for adjudication, two outcomes are possible, victory or loss, whether right or wrong, the position of the court prevails.
For the APC Chairman to play judge in a matter he is an interested party is bad to decide on facts he is not trained to handle or privileged to examine objectively is taking one’s powers too far.
Even so, what Oyegun and a few other partisan interests did was an attempt to heat up the polity which is capable of misleading the people. The judiciary is still the last hope of the citizens. Indeed, if allowed to be destroyed, the effect on the nation is better imagined than experienced, especially, in times like this.
We think that Oyegun and his co-travellers should be called to order by all well-meaning Nigerians. In fact, Oyegun should be responsible enough to apologise to the nation and represent his party well as a responsible and law-abiding group.
Editorial
Checkmating ‘One-Chance’ Menaces In PH
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
-
News3 days agoRSG Targets Nine Million Residents in Mosquito Net Distribution Campaign
-
Oil & Energy3 days agoAiyedatiwa Signs New Electricity Bill
-
Maritime3 days agoMarine Minister Commends President Tinubu On NPERA Bill Assent
-
Oil & Energy3 days agoNLNG Commissions Research And Innovation Centre In RSU
-
News3 days agoKenPoly Holds Eight Convocations, August 29
-
News3 days agoRSG Begins Another Phase of Projects Commissioning Today
-
News3 days agoRMAFC Completes Revenue Sharing Review, Proposes New Pay
-
Maritime3 days agoNAGAFF Petitions IGP Over Alleged Maritime Police Harassment
