Features
2016 Budget: Need For Thorough Scrutiny
One feature of a corporate
plan is a series of budgets that translate country, state, local government or company intentions into a series of assignment and provide the money to carry them out. The Oxford Advanced Lerner’s Dictionary defines budget as the money that is available to a person or an organization and plan of how it will be spent over a period of time. Since a budget extends over a period of time, it represents a flow of assignments rather than a stationary approach, and changes can be made rather quickly, especially if the budgets are reviewed monthly or quarterly.
There are two main types of budgets which include capital and expense. Capital spending is investment, merely a change in the form in which assets are held. The money a government or company spends to carry on its day-to-day activities or business, on the other hand, represents the actual out-of-pocket costs that must be recovered through internally generated revenue or sales during the budget year.
In the government circle, budgets are targeted to capture all the projects and activities proposed for the year, hence we have the capital expenditure, recurrent expenditure and the targeted revenue. In every budget, some scheme of priorities for projects must be adopted and there are some projects that simply have to be undertaken regardless of the economic calculations, since they must be budgeted for if the country should live up to its responsibilities or expectations.
There are projects required to meet the provisions of the law and there are numerous regulations by local, state and federal governments relating to security, defence, employment and employees’ welfare, among others that may necessitate new investment or expenditure. If there is pressure on government to tackle a problem that affects generality of the citizenry, it may have to spend a great deal of money for solution even though the project brings in no return in the conventional sense. Generally, when a government is compelled to restrategise, it has to incorporate improvements.
The controversy that trailed the 2016 Budget would have been avoided if those who prepared it for the President before presentation to the National Assembly were careful and displayed professionalism in that craft. When President Muhammadu Buhari assumed office, on being sworn-in, he told Nigerians that a team of technocrats had been assembled to affect the change philosophy of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
In fact, the circumstances that surrounded the 2016 Budget that was presented to the Senate on Tuesday, December 23, 2015 is a clear indication and manifestation of incompetency from the Presidency to the Senate. At no time in the history of Nigeria that a documented budget proposal was pronounced missing or withdrawn from the Senate after presentation. A lot of Nigerians were disgusted and disappointed with the intricacies that contrived the budget.
From a 2-week recess, the Senate resumed plenary without the 2016 Budget on the order paper for debate amid heightened curiosity, as to what might have gone wrong. Some senators allged that the budget was nowhere to be found at the National Assembly with other fillers that the budget documents that were laid before the Senate by President Buhari early December 2015 had not been duplicated for distribution to Senators and members of the House of Representatives due to paucity of funds. There was also a wide speculation in some quarters that the documents had been withdrawn or got missing from the Senate. Some lawmakers said they were suspicious that the Presidency might have colluded with the management of NASS to quietly withdraw the documents after detecting some discrepancies in them.
One of them likened it to a kind of national embarrassment. His words, “can you imagine this kind of national embarrassment? Documents that were presented to us with fanfare have been stolen. This is unbelievable as it has not happened since history of Nigeria”. Senators of the PDP accused the Presidency of being behind the theft of the documents, an accusation rejected by APC, who said it was too early to speculate.
On his part, Senate President Abubakar Bukola Saraki later denied disappearance of the budget but disclosed that copies of a version different from the 2016 Appropriation Bill as originally laid by Buhari had been served to senators by the Special Adviser to President Buhari on NASS Matters, Senator Eta Enang. According to him, it was alteration of the doctoring of the original documents, pointing out that the finding of the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions on investigations surrounding the 2016 Appropriation Bill was that Senator Eta Enang printed copies on the Bill and brought to the Senate was different from the version presented by Mr. President.
A former National Chairman of the APC, and one-time governor of Osun State, Bisi Akande while commenting on the 2016 budget controversy in an interview, lampooned the Senate leadership for what he described as an act of indiscipline. He said that his party was mindful of the consequences of allowing wrong people to be at the helm of affairs which was the reason the party wanted disciplined individuals to lead the Senate.
“Nigeria’s budget is huge document and wonders how such a document could be missing in the Senate”, Akande said, adding “the development is a fallout of indiscipline that brought the current leadership of the Senate into the position and as you know, that was not the choice of our party”.
The Presidency had after presenting the budget discovered that some of the figures proposed were increasingly high through a letter addressed to Bukola Saraki and Dogara of the NASS and House of Representatives respectively. The report revealed that the old budget contained major omissions like absence of allocation for the second Niger Bridge while a large sum was allocated for line items which had now been reviewed.
Following the purported missing of the documents, the Senate President Saraki met with President Buhari at the Presidential Villa.
It is traditional that once the budget is laid, it would be referred to the joint Committee on Finance and Appropriations for section by section analysis. That the differences spotted by the Senate “do not really affect the substance of the budget to the extent that there is serious breach” is not enough to believe that all is well with the budget, even though the Senate went ahead to deliberate on it.
The preparation of the 2016 Appropriation Bill was a litmus test of the Presidency’s efficiency, but the controversy that trailed it on presentation to the Senate shows that no thorough work was done. The criticisms and revelations that followed or emerged in the process and the carelessness of the NASS management in securing the original copy laid before the Senators by President Buhari amply signify that the budget is not perfect. Before the controversies that beclouded the budget, there had been some hard knocks on it in some quarters.
One of such criticisms came from a renowned Nigerian Economist, Professor Pat Utomi, who described the 2016 national budget as ‘a joke’. President Buhari had presented a budget estimate of N6.08 trillion before a joint session of the National Assembly on Tuesday, December 22, 2015. Speaking on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily, Professor Utomi said, “Putting it in a very awkward position, I consider the budget process a joke”. He said the issue was not about making luxurious budget but argued that the major deterrent was always implementation”.
Utomi emphasized, “we somehow do not have the discipline of the budget process, we go through budget as public relations exercises because they are supposed to be done and decision makers go ahead to do whatever they want to do” . Proffering solutions to the problem of budget implementation in the country, he said “the goal is to achieve an execution premium, but if those who are responsible for the budget really had no plan whatsoever to follow it, then, you are wasting your time”. “I think what has happened to us is that we got to a point of disconnect between the leadership elite, the political class, the bureaucratic elite and development aspirants of the Nigerian people. The major reason the budget is not working in Nigeria is leadership”, Utomi said.
Indeed, there is low energy in the leadership of this country as they are not leading in the right direction. The country is dealing with a huge financing gap, no doubt, and we cannot pretend that all is well, but if we do, then, “we will run into an economic spiral”.
Also bemoaning the 2016 budget, the PDP said, “By all standards, the budget, the first major economic policy outing of this present government, is completely unrealistic and duplicitously embellished with impractical predictions, a development that confirms fears by economy watchers and investors that this administration is obviously ill-equipped for governance”. The PDP, therefore, advised President Buhari to once again involve experienced and well-tested hands in the management of the economy, and budgeting processes.
A very important type of budget to which countries across the globe are giving increased attention these days is the cash flow budget. A country may estimate a certain amount over the period of a year and find itself in difficulty, even if the estimate is accurate. Money seldom flows in evenly. In the meantime, Nigeria needs money to finance projects and provide the welfare needs of the people and not a bogus budget that is not realizable and implementable. Comparison of performance against budget is one of the best methods of determining whether or not the country is spending more or less than it had planned to, and tracing the reasons for overages and underages or deficit and making any necessary corrections.
Budgets are an excellent tool for both planning and control, although they have their shortcomings. Thus, the budget is usually based on historical trends which may not continue as it may be influenced by what the leadership of the country or state would like to happen or do. Naturally, the leaders are interested in larger money and hopefully budget on the basis that this will materialize, even though the chances of their doing so are not very great. So, the 2016 budget in its final form must be carefully scrutinized and watched to achieve the best result and proper implementation.

President Muhammadu Buhari
Shedie Okpara
Features
Before It Becomes A Norm
The reported selection of 16
The incident reportedly
Traditional institutions have
The ministry should also
Fiona Kogbara
Aba Road, PH.
As Governance Takes A Back
Across the country,
Nigerians face deteriorating
Those seeking re-election
Political parties and
Salma Ibrahim
Rumuokoro, PH.
Ebola In Abuja?
Reports of a possible Ebola
The Federal Ministry of
Ebola requires early
The media must verify reports
Tonia Iweka
Ogbor Hill, Aba
Features
Empowering The Girl Child,Building A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive ?
Every girl deserves the opportunity to learn, the freedom to dream, the right to live without fear and the chance to determine the course of her own future.
Yet, for millions of girls around the world, these opportunities remain difficult to access. Some struggle to obtain quality education, while others face discrimination, early marriage, gender-based violence and social expectations that limit their ambitions. For many, the challenge begins in childhood, when decisions about their lives are made without giving their voices the attention they deserve.
October 11, observed annually as the International Day of the Girl Child, provides an opportunity to reflect on these challenges and renew the commitment to protecting girls’ rights and empowering them to reach their full potential.
The day also raises an important question: how can societies talk about a better future for girls while some of them continue to face barriers to education, safety, equality and opportunity?
For Nigeria, where girls are growing up in communities with different social, economic and cultural circumstances, the occasion offers an opportunity to examine the progress made, recognise the challenges that remain and consider the responsibilities of families, communities and government in securing a better future for every girl.
From Recognition to Action
The International Day of the Girl Child was established by the United Nations and first observed on October 11, 2012. It was created to recognise the rights of girls and draw attention to the particular challenges they face across the world.
Its significance extends beyond a yearly celebration. It highlights the need for societies to address the inequalities that prevent girls from enjoying the same opportunities, protection and dignity as their male counterparts.
Girls have the right to education, healthcare, safety, participation and equal treatment. They also have the right to express their opinions, develop their abilities and make decisions about their futures in accordance with their age and evolving capacities.
These rights are not privileges to be granted only when families can afford them or when communities consider them convenient. They are part of the wider commitment to protecting the dignity and development of every child.
The observance also recognises that girls are not simply beneficiaries of development programmes. They are potential scientists, teachers, journalists, entrepreneurs, doctors, engineers, public servants and community leaders whose contributions can shape the future of their societies.
When girls are given the opportunity to develop their abilities, the benefits extend beyond individual achievement to families, communities and the wider economy.
The Nigerian Girl Child
In Nigeria, the experiences of girls differ considerably depending on their family circumstances, location, access to education and the opportunities available within their communities.
Some girls attend well-equipped schools, participate in extracurricular activities and receive support to pursue their ambitions. Others face difficulties that threaten their ability to complete their education or develop their full potential.
Poverty remains a significant concern for families struggling to meet basic needs. In some households, girls may be expected to undertake extensive domestic responsibilities, care for younger siblings or contribute to family income at the expense of their education.
For girls in rural and underserved communities, the distance to school, inadequate facilities, limited access to learning materials and other practical barriers may make education difficult to sustain.
Insecurity can create additional risks, particularly where families fear sending their children to school or where displacement interrupts their education.
These challenges do not affect every Nigerian girl in the same way. However, they demonstrate why protecting the rights of girls requires more than general statements about equality. It requires practical action that addresses the circumstances preventing them from accessing opportunities.
A girl who cannot attend school because her family cannot afford the necessary expenses needs support that makes education accessible. A girl exposed to abuse needs protection and access to appropriate services. A girl whose ambitions are dismissed simply because of her gender needs an environment that recognises her abilities.
The responsibility is to ensure that the circumstances of a girl’s birth do not determine the limits of her future.
Education: Opening the Door to Opportunity
Education remains one of the most important ways to empower the girl child.
Through education, girls acquire knowledge, develop critical thinking skills and gain a better understanding of their rights and responsibilities. Schooling can also expand their employment opportunities and help them make informed decisions about their lives.
An educated girl is better positioned to understand the choices available to her, participate in community life and contribute to social and economic development.
However, access to education alone is not enough. Girls must also be able to learn in safe environments, receive quality instruction and complete their education without discrimination or unnecessary barriers.
Parents and guardians have an important role in ensuring that girls are encouraged to attend school and are given the support needed to continue learning.
Schools, in turn, must provide environments where girls are protected from harassment, bullying and discrimination. Teachers can help by treating students fairly, encouraging participation and challenging assumptions that certain subjects or careers are suitable only for boys.
Government also has a responsibility to strengthen educational infrastructure, improve learning conditions and address the financial and social barriers that keep children out of school.
The goal should not simply be to enrol more girls in classrooms. It should be to ensure that every girl has a genuine opportunity to learn, complete her education and use the knowledge she acquires to build a meaningful future.
When Tradition Becomes a Barrier
Culture and tradition are important parts of community identity. They preserve history, strengthen relationships and provide a sense of belonging.
However, certain practices and social expectations can restrict girls’ rights and opportunities when they place greater value on gender than on individual ability and well-being.
In some communities, girls may be discouraged from pursuing higher education because marriage and domestic responsibilities are considered more important. Others may face pressure to abandon their ambitions or accept decisions made without their participation.
Child marriage remains another serious concern in Nigeria. When a girl is married before adulthood, her education, health, safety and personal development may be placed at risk.
Such situations highlight the importance of protecting children while encouraging communities to examine practices that undermine their rights.
Empowering girls does not require rejecting every cultural tradition. It requires preserving what strengthens communities while addressing practices that expose children to harm or deny them opportunities.
Community leaders, parents, educators and religious institutions can contribute by promoting the value of girls’ education, supporting their development and speaking against harmful practices.
A community’s strength should not be measured by how effectively it restricts the ambitions of its girls, but by how well it protects its children and prepares them for the future.
Protecting Girls from Violence and Abuse
A discussion about empowering girls cannot be complete without addressing their right to safety.
Girls may face different forms of abuse, including sexual violence, physical punishment, exploitation, bullying, harassment and harmful treatment within homes, schools and communities.
Some incidents remain unreported because victims fear blame, retaliation or public humiliation. Others may lack access to trusted adults or services capable of helping them.
The consequences can be serious, affecting a girl’s physical health, emotional well-being, education and ability to trust others.
Protecting girls requires adults and institutions to take reports of abuse seriously and respond in ways that prioritise the child’s safety and dignity.
Parents and guardians should encourage open communication so that girls feel able to report situations that make them uncomfortable or unsafe. Schools need clear procedures for reporting and responding to abuse, while relevant authorities must ensure that children can access appropriate protection and support.
Girls should also receive age-appropriate information about personal safety, boundaries and where to seek help.
Importantly, the responsibility for preventing abuse belongs to those who commit it and to the institutions responsible for protection. Girls must never be blamed for violence or exploitation directed against them.
A society that celebrates the girl child must also be prepared to defend her rights when those rights are threatened.
Health, Confidence and the Freedom to Dream
Empowerment also means ensuring that girls can grow up healthy, confident and informed about their bodies and well-being.
Access to healthcare, adequate nutrition, clean water, sanitation and accurate health information is essential to their development.
For adolescent girls, menstrual health is particularly important. Where sanitary products, private toilets or reliable information are unavailable, menstruation can create practical difficulties that affect attendance at school and participation in daily activities.
Families, schools and relevant institutions can help by providing accurate information, challenging harmful misconceptions and ensuring that girls have access to appropriate facilities and support.
Emotional well-being also deserves attention. Girls who experience discrimination, bullying, abuse or constant pressure to meet unrealistic expectations may struggle with confidence and self-worth.
Encouragement from parents, teachers and trusted adults can help them recognise their abilities and develop the confidence to pursue their goals.
A girl should not have to choose between being accepted by society and believing in her own potential.
She should be able to explore her interests, develop her talents and imagine a future that reflects her abilities, values and ambitions.
The Role of Parents, Schools and Government
Empowering the girl child is a shared responsibility.
Parents and guardians are often the first people who shape a girl’s understanding of her worth and potential. Their encouragement can influence whether she feels confident enough to pursue education, express her views and aspire to leadership.
Providing equal encouragement to girls and boys, sharing household responsibilities fairly and listening to girls’ concerns are practical ways families can promote equality at home.
Schools must ensure that girls have equal opportunities to learn, participate in activities and develop leadership skills. Teachers should challenge gender stereotypes and encourage girls to explore subjects and careers based on their interests and abilities.
Government institutions also have a responsibility to protect children’s rights through effective laws, policies, educational support and accessible protection services. Laws must be implemented, and families should be able to seek help when a child’s safety or rights are threatened.
Communities, civil society organisations and the media can support these efforts by educating the public, drawing attention to harmful practices and highlighting positive examples of girls overcoming barriers.
The media, in particular, can help change public attitudes by portraying girls as active participants in development rather than limiting their stories to vulnerability and suffering.
Together, these efforts can create an environment in which girls are protected, heard and given the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to society.
Beyond October 11
The International Day of the Girl Child is an important reminder, but the protection and empowerment of girls cannot be achieved through a single day’s activities.
It requires sustained action in homes, schools, workplaces, communities and public institutions.
It means ensuring that a girl from a low-income family has access to education, that a girl living in a rural community is not forgotten in development planning, and that a girl who reports abuse receives appropriate protection rather than blame.
It also means listening to girls when decisions affect their lives and including their perspectives in discussions about education, healthcare, safety and development.
The measure of progress is not simply the number of speeches delivered or campaigns organised. It is whether girls are safer, better educated, healthier and more able to make meaningful choices about their futures.
Every girl deserves the opportunity to grow without violence, learn without discrimination and pursue her ambitions without being limited by harmful expectations.
A Future Where Every Girl Can Thrive
The future of any society is closely connected to the opportunities available to its children.
When girls are educated, protected and encouraged to develop their abilities, they are better positioned to contribute to their families, communities and the wider society. When their rights are neglected, the consequences can extend far beyond the individual child.
As the world marks October 11, the message to Nigeria and the international community is clear: empowering girls begins with recognising their rights and continues through the practical steps taken to protect them.
It begins with a parent who encourages a daughter to remain in school, a teacher who recognises her potential, a community that rejects harmful practices and institutions that respond seriously when her rights are violated.
It also requires a willingness to question beliefs and practices that deny girls the freedom to learn, grow and participate in society.
A girl’s future should not be determined by poverty, discrimination or the assumption that her ambitions matter less than those of a boy.
Every girl deserves the chance to discover what she can become.
On this International Day of the Girl Child, the call is not merely to celebrate girls, but to protect their rights, invest in their education, listen to their voices and create a society where every girl has the freedom and opportunity to thrive.
Because empowering a girl is not simply about changing her life today. It is about helping to build a future in which her dignity is respected, her potential is recognised and her rights are protected every day.
Davies Christian Nelson & Dominic Emediong Emmanuel
Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications.
Features
Beyond Tradition As Stakeholders Seek Collaboration To End FGM In Rivers
For generations, Female Genital Mutilation(FGM) has remained one of the most deeply entrenched harmful traditional practices affecting women and girls across many societies.Sustained largely by cultural beliefs, misconceptions and long-standing norms, the practice has continued despite increasing global awareness of its severe health, psychological and human rights consequences.
In Nigeria, however, growing public awareness, stronger legal frameworks and coordinated interventions by government institutions and development partners are gradually changing the narrative.Although significant progress has been recorded, experts insist that achieving the complete eradication of female genital mutilation requires more than legislation. It demands sustained collaboration, continuous public enlightenment, community ownership and the willingness to challenge harmful practices that have endured across generations.
To this end, stakeholders in Rivers State have renewed calls for stronger collaboration, sustained public enlightenment and community ownership in the fight against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), warning that the harmful practice cannot be completely eradicated through legislation alone.
The call was made during the Third Quarter State Technical Committee Meeting on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation in Rivers State, organised by the Rivers State Ministry of Health with support from the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and other development partners.
The meeting brought together representatives of the Ministries of Health, Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Information and Communications, civil society organisations, child protection advocates, development partners and other stakeholders committed to protecting women and girls from harmful traditional practices.
The engagement provided an opportunity for participants to review progress recorded in the state, examine persistent challenges and develop practical strategies for accelerating the elimination of FGM through stronger partnerships, coordinated interventions and evidence-based advocacy.
A major focus of the meeting was the need to broaden public understanding of what constitutes FGM. Participants noted that the practice extends beyond the commonly recognised cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and includes other harmful procedures that can cause lasting physical and psychological damage.
Setting the tone for the technical discussions, the Reproductive Health Coordinator, Rivers State Ministry of Health, Dr. Ebere Smith, described FGM as both a reproductive health concern and a social injustice that violates the bodily integrity, dignity and wellbeing of women and girls.
According to her, although FGM has historically been sustained by cultural beliefs and traditions in many communities, medical evidence has established that the practice exposes women and girls to avoidable health complications and psychological trauma.
“It is an injustice to the female anatomy. It is not just a reproductive injustice; it is also a social one. It affects a woman’s emotional well-being, childbirth, marriage and overall quality of life,” Dr. Smith said.
She explained that FGM can involve the use of unsterilised razor blades, knives, scissors and needles, while drawing attention to less recognised practices, including the repeated pressing of a baby girl’s genital area with hot water, which she identified as a form of Type IV FGM.
Dr. Smith noted that survivors could suffer excessive bleeding, infections, chronic pain, complications during childbirth, sexual dysfunction and emotional trauma, among other long-term health consequences.
She therefore stressed the importance of providing families and communities with accurate information to dispel misconceptions that have allowed harmful practices to persist across generations.
“Having the right information at the right time for the right people is essential,” she said, emphasising the roles of healthcare workers, parents, caregivers, traditional institutions, educators, journalists and community leaders in preventing FGM.
Speaking on progress made in Rivers State, the UNICEF Desk Officer in the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Dr. Victor Iseberetonma, expressed optimism over the impact of sustained advocacy and community sensitisation.
He disclosed that sensitisation structures established in about 60 communities were conducting house-to-house campaigns, church outreaches and market engagements aimed at educating residents on the dangers of FGM.
Iseberetonma also noted that an increasing number of traditional rulers and community leaders were demonstrating commitment to ending the practice within their domains.
He described the willingness of some monarchs to formally abolish FGM in their communities as an important milestone, stressing, however, that the ultimate objective remained the complete eradication of the practice across Rivers State.
In his technical presentation, UNICEF Facilitator, Mr. Uchenna Unah, cited findings from the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), which showed that the prevalence of FGM among women aged 15–49 had declined from 20 per cent in 2018 to 14 per cent in 2024.
Despite the decline, Unah said FGM remained a significant public health and human rights concern, noting that 85 per cent of girls and women who underwent the practice experienced it before the age of five.
He further highlighted encouraging changes in public attitudes, stating that 71 per cent of women and 74 per cent of men surveyed believed that FGM should not continue, while a similar majority affirmed that no religion requires the practice.
He urged stakeholders to sustain evidence-based advocacy, strengthen community engagement and intensify public enlightenment to ensure that the declining prevalence ultimately translates into the complete elimination of FGM.
Also contributing to the discussions, the State Coordinator of the Child Protection Network (CPN), Rivers State, Inyinyi Irimagha, challenged the continued use of the term “female circumcision”, describing it as medically inaccurate.
She explained that circumcision refers to the removal of the male foreskin and should not be used to describe harmful procedures carried out on the female genitalia.
Irimagha said collaboration between the Rivers State Ministry of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Child Protection Network, UNICEF and other partners had strengthened community advocacy through survivor groups, adolescent networks, male champions and traditional rulers.
She also highlighted the need to increase awareness of Type IV FGM, particularly practices that communities may not recognise as forms of genital mutilation.
According to her, the absence of cutting does not mean that such practices are harmless, as damage to delicate tissues and nerves can result in long-term health and reproductive complications.
Beyond the formal presentations, discussions with participants revealed that misconceptions about FGM remain widespread.
Some participants admitted that they had previously associated FGM exclusively with the physical cutting or removal of parts of the female genitalia and were surprised to learn that other harmful practices are also recognised internationally as forms of FGM.
The discussions further highlighted the influence of culture and intergenerational traditions on perceptions of women’s health. Some participants recalled practices that had been passed down for generations without sufficient consideration of their medical implications.
One cultural practice mentioned during the engagement involved placing a snail between the legs of a woman after childbirth based on the belief that its slimy nature could help control bleeding.
Participants agreed that while cultural traditions remain important to communities, practices that pose risks to human health should be subjected to scientific scrutiny and discontinued where necessary.
A resident, Sampson, described the enlightenment as an eye-opener, noting that many people had traditionally believed that applying hot water to a newborn girl’s genital area was simply a routine hygiene practice.
He said greater public awareness was needed to ensure that families did not unknowingly expose their children to harmful practices.
Another participant, DollyPur, stressed the importance of creating safe spaces for community dialogue, saying that people often continue harmful practices because “everyone else” appears to be doing the same thing.
She noted that open discussions involving parents, community leaders and other stakeholders could help communities understand the health consequences of harmful traditional practices and encourage behavioural change.
The stakeholders consequently agreed that the elimination of FGM requires sustained cooperation among government institutions, healthcare professionals, traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations, development partners, the media and communities.
They emphasised that continuous public enlightenment, accurate health information and community-led interventions remain critical to correcting misconceptions, changing attitudes and protecting the health, dignity and rights of women and girls across Rivers State.
Christian Nelson Davies & Ekemini Victor Sunday
Dr Davies is the Director of Publications, Rivers State Ministry of Information and Communications, and Ekemini, an intern
-
Niger Delta5 hours agoDiri Restates Stance On Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway
-
Niger Delta5 hours agoC’River, NUJ Pay Tribute To Late Guardian Editor
-
News6 hours agoNDLEA Recovers Tons Of Illicit Drug Consignments In Nine States
-
Opinion4 hours agoChecking Voter Apathy In Nigeria’s Electoral Process
-
Oil & Energy5 hours agoS&P Global Warns Hormuz Energy Shock Could Become A Global Food Crisis
-
Oil & Energy5 hours agoGas Reserves Hit 215 Trillion Cubic Feet
-
Rivers5 hours agoEducation Ministry Condemns Female Virginity Testing In CHS, Taabaa
-
Oil & Energy5 hours agoNCDMB, Manufacturers Commit To Scale Up Local Oil And Gas Production Components
