Opinion
Equipping The Military For Results
One popular phrase
among high ranking security personnel since the menacing activities of the insurgents in Nigeria is “security consciousness”. Inshort, no speech is, complete without highlighting security as every person’s business.
Thus, for this reason, the populace is further advised to take extra step to police their immediate environment, and suspect every unusual movement.
While such initiative could be tagged worthy, the possibility of having everyone in the neighbourhood turn watchdogs overnight remains a mirage and what exactly are these security laymen looking out for? Even when they sniff foul, what should they do? raise alarm? run for their dear lives? or call on the trained security personnel?
Assuming the very last option be adopted, what is the guarantee that these so-called-trained security personnel would live up to their bidding, amidst complaints of ill-equipped formations?
These and many more questions seem to cluster my mind each time I am weighed down by the realities of the security challenges in Nigeria. But I am somewhat comforted by the words of the outgone Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Azubuike Ihejirika in which he said that the Nigerian Army was being restructured to meet the current security challenges facing the country. Ihejirika, maintained that the army was being equipped to meet emerging security challenges. These he said during the graduation of the Logistic Staff Course 9/2012 of the Nigerian Army College of Logistics, Lagos.
Ofcourse, Lt-Gen Azubuike Ihejirika, in all his paraphenelia as the then Chief of Army Staff, could not have intended a deceit for his audience when he said and repeatedly too, that the Nigerian Army was being equipped and organised to cope with the present challenges of nation building in addition to their constitutional roles of protecting the sovereignty of the nation.
However, two years after Ihejirika raised the hope of Nigerians to the fact that the Nigerian Army was on its way to assume its rightful place in the security and defence business, some Nigerians are yet to come to terms with his statement, many still see same as mere vague pronouncement. They ask questions such as “restructuring for what? equipped with what?, no details with which to hold them accountable.
On the other hand, a process which has lasted for two years and beyond, should be boasting of some level of visibility or transparency, but the story of the Nigerian army has not been anything other than what we’ve known for ages which ofcourse has not helped us so far. Although some accuse the military of going to roost due to prolonged peaceful atmosphere the nation has enjoyed since the end of the Nigeria- Biafra civil war even at that, does a dancer forget the dance step he knows best?
While I will not want to believe that the restructuring and equipping of the Nigerian army is only in the area of increased mobility, as seen in the now ubiquitous Toyota hilux trucks, army uniforms, boots, kevlar helmets and jackets seemed to be more available to deployed troops, I would rather want to see the recent departure of 1,200 Nigerian security personnel for Russia as part of the restructuring and equipping exercise. This number, which includes members of the armed forces, the police and members of the Department of State Services, DSS, has so far left Abuja for anti-insurgent training in Russia.
Although, it was not revealed what yardstick was adopted for the selection of the participants in the training programme, there are fears that the Nigerian syndrome may not be ruled out where the non-qualified are preferred for the qualified for reasons of vested interest as against the collective interest of the nation.
It is therefore, pertinent to state here that the ‘calling’ of the military from the word ‘Go’, had always placed the national interest above personal interests. Any attempt therefore to undermine that which has been, may be throwing the nation into a great jeopardy. The need to look inward with a view to searching out the functional, good-to-go combatants, who will go, learn and bring to bear in the nation that which they have learnt must not be overemphasized at this point in our nation’s history.
Again while security could be seen as every person’s business, we must not lose sight of the fact that those who have relinquished their pleasure, just to secure lives and properties, must not go about their duties with bare hands while enemies gadge themselves with sophisticated weapons.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
