Opinion

Of Ebola And Boko Haram (I)

Published

12 years ago

September 5, 2014

Ebola Virus disease is more daring, dreaded,
deadly and dangerous than Boko Haram. Whereas Boko Haram strikes people found in their domain of North-East, Nigeria, especially in Borno State, Ebola kills people anywhere, even in the remote village and inside one’s bedroom.
Since the arrival of this giant killer, called Ebola in Nigeria, stress and tension increased in a nation that over stressed becaase of Boko Haram insurgency in the northern part of Nigeria. Movement to countries affected by its virus is somehow restricted. Many international conferences in Nigeria have been cancelled. Movement of people from other countries to Nigeria is reduced and ban placed on the movement of corpses in and outsideNigeria. Burial, which is a celebration in Nigeria, particularly in Ikwerre land is now low-keyed. Attention, attendance and vibrancy given to burials in Nigeria are curtailed. People attend burial nowadays with fears and caution.
Hospitals and other health care services in Nigeria are now in disarray. Fears has gripped doctors, nurses and other health care providers. This is because they don’t know which of the patients they are about to treat is infected with Ebola virus. Health workers these days dress like people going to the space because of Ebola.
Hand shake, which is common among Nigerians is now forbidden and avoided. People are no more comfortable relating with their fellow Nigerians. In commercial buses and taxis, people are suspicious of each other. Ebola virus disease is separating mankind, drawing lines and demarcating nations. This is what Ebola is doing to Nigeria that Boko Haram could not do.
Of all ailments and diseases we have seen and heard, such as HIV/AIDS, cancer, stroke, typhoid, malaria, diabetes, hypertension, tuberculosis among others, none is as daring, troublesome, problematic and dangerous as Ebola Virus disease. Worse still, Ebola has no cure or vaccine for now. If I may ask, where is the world and its inhabitants particularly Nigeria is heading to?
Ebola virus disease was first discovered in 1976 in Zaire, now Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ebola is a name of a River, called Ebola River in that country. Ebola River has a tick forest where all kinds of animals inhabit. They include Apes, gorillas, monkeys, chimpanzees, reptiles, etc. Also, birds of the sky of different species perch in Ebola Forest.
It is believed that the animals and birds in Ebola River Forest feed on infected fruits and animals and in the Forest. Thus, it is through consumption of these animals and birds that the virus was transmitted to the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo . Hence, it was called “Ebola Virus disease.” Besides Democratic Republic of Congo, countries like Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and recently, Nigeria have recorded cases of Ebola Virus disease.
Ebola virus disease was imported into Nigeria on July 20, 2014 by a Liberian-American, late Mr. Patrick Sawyer. Mr. Sawyer contracted Ebola virus from his sister, who died of the disease on July 8, 2014. He was a staff of the ArcelorMittal, an iron mining company based in Liberia. He was diagnosed and discovered of contracting the Ebola virus and was quarantined in Buchanan, Liberia. But regrettably Sawyer was cleared to travel to Nigeria for an ECOWAS conference in Calabar by the Liberian authority, even though he was under isolation and observation.
Sawyer arrived Nigeria under excruciating pain and weakness, and was found laying flat on his stomach on the floor in the corridor of the Airport. Unknown that he was suffering with Ebola virus disease he was helped by the Airport Porters to a hospital at Obalande, Lagos for medical assistance. He was diagnosed and found of contracting Ebola virus, and he subsequently died. Sadly, a female medical doctor, Stella Ameyo Adadevoh who attended to Sawyer, contracted Ebola virus and had died of the disease. Nurses and others who had physical contact with Sawyer are now quarantined and monitored.
I laughed when late Sawyer’s wife who said she knew her late husband more than anybody, including Sawyer himself that Sawyer came to Nigeria merely to seek for a better medical attention. I wonder when Nigeria became a super nation in health care services than USA and India where he should had gone for a better medical care, if indeed he was seeking for a better health care service. However, for me, I saw Sawyer’s travel and death in Nigeria as a conspiracy, deliberate and calculated attempt by the Liberian government and ECOWAS states to wake Nigeria up against the disease.
Ogbuehi, a journalist, wrote in from Port Harcourt.
To be continued.
Their thinking is that the world will not pay proper attention to the deadly virus until it gets to Nigeria, being the most populous black nation on earth. Hence, ECOWAS invited Sawyer for a conference in Nigeria and Liberia cleared him to attend, not minding that he was on observation of Ebola virus. Again, I saw Sawyer’s death in Nigeria as a honourable one. Had he died quietly in Liberia, no one would have heard about Patrick Sawyer and much about Ebola, as we have heard and known it now.
By choosing to die in Nigeria, Mr. Sawyer had no doubt immortalized himself and saved many people in Afri who would have ignorantly contracted the virus. Today, indeed the attention of Nigeria, Africa and the world on Ebola virus disease is unprecedented. Also, . measures are been taken. I heard that the trees harbouring bats and other birds dropping faeces on visitors’ cars in the Presidential Villa, Abuja are now cut-off. Courtesy of late Patrick Sawyer.
My only regret, however, is the death of a female doctor, Ms. Adadevoh who battled to save Sawyer’s life and later discovered that he was suffering with Ebola virus, and she quickly quarantined him. And of course other health workers infected by their close contact with Sawyer. May God save their lives for working to save other peoples’ lives.
Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria began in 2008 or thereabout in Borno State, North East, Nigeria by one Yesuf who started by brain washing the youth of the area with strange and doubtful Islamic doctrines, which resulted to pockets of crises here and there. Yesuf was arrested and later killed. Since then, Nigeria has not known peace as the organisation has turned into full blown terrorism and have murdered thousands of people.
I agreed with Nigerian minister of health, Prof. Onyebuchi Chukwu that Sawyer’s action has placed unnecessary stress on Nigeria, considering the stress the nation is passing through over Boko Haram insurgency in the North East, Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the basic things to do to prevent the spread of Ebola are keeping good hygiene and sanitation, avoiding physical contact with Ebola infected patients or persons, regular washing of hands, keeping away from infected animals and eating of bush meats, touching of infected died persons, ensuring that Ebota infected persons are isolated etc. ‘
Ebola symptoms are weakness, diarrhea, stomach pain, headache, fever, vomiting, depression, red’ eyes, cold, confusion, cough, sore throat, chest pain, joints and muscles pain, internal and external bleeding etc. 21 days are Ebola virus incubation period. These are Ebola deadly weapons against human race.
I wish the Federal Government could deploy great Ebola to Boko Haram, or Ebola would on its own walk boldly and majestically to Sambisa forest or wherever their camp may be to engage them in the battle of supremacy. By the time Ebola deploy five of its deadly weapons like weakness, diarrhea, dislocation of joint and muscles, excruciating pain, they will surrender and let Nigeria be, and of course give Borno and the neighbouring states a breathing space.
President Goodluck Jonathan and Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos state should be commended for their bold and prompt steps taken to prevent the spread of Ebola virus in Nigeria. Late Dr. Stella Ameyo Adadevoh, the daughter of Prof. Babatunde Kwaku Adadevoh and great grand daughter of Nigerian Nationalist, Late Herbert Macaulay should be commended and honoured for diagnosing Sawyer as an Ebola virus infected patient and quarantined him. Dr. Adadevoh sacrificed her life to save Nigerians.
It is sad and regrettable that Rivers State Government has chosen Oduoha-Emohua, my community as a quarantine (isolation) centre of the Ebola virus infected patients. It is indeed sad that Ebola virus disease discovered in faraway Democratic Republic of Congo has now a camp for its victims in Oduoha-Emohua. Well, I pray that God will also choose Oduoha-Emohua as a healing centre of the universe of all the and ailments diseases. Afterall, our ancestors prided Oduoha-Emohua as a hospitable community; and it has been known as such to this days. Could that be the reason of sitjing on Ebola centre in Oduoha-Emohua? To God be the glory.
Ogbuehi, a journalist and social commentator, wrote in from Port Harcourt.

Prince Ike Ogbuehi

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s Outburst

Published

1 week ago

August 3, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection.

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Sacrificing Humanity for Politics?

Published

1 week ago

August 3, 2026

The Tide

“Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. No politician is worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence.””Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent”.

Every election season leaves behind more than ballot papers and campaign posters. It often leaves broken friendships, divided families, fractured communities, and hearts filled with resentment. In the heat of political competition, many people forget a simple but profound truth: politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. Across our communities, it has become increasingly common to see people sever lifelong relationships simply because they support different political parties or candidates. Individuals who once shared meals, celebrated milestones, and stood by each other during difficult times suddenly become strangers not because they committed any personal offence, but because they exercised their democratic right to think differently. This growing trend should concern every citizen. Politics is designed to provide leadership, shape public policy, and improve society.

It was never intended to become a weapon for destroying relationships or creating permanent enemies. When politics begins to erode our humanity, it ceases to serve its true purpose. A democratic society thrives on diversity of thought. Every citizen possesses the constitutional right to support any political party, candidate, or ideology without fear of intimidation or hatred. Political disagreement is not a crime; rather, it is evidence that democracy is alive and functioning. The true measure of political maturity is not our ability to silence opposing voices but our willingness to respect them. Unfortunately, many people have mistaken political loyalty for personal hostility. Instead of debating ideas, they attack personalities. Instead of discussing policies, they spread insults and misinformation. Instead of building bridges, they construct walls of bitterness.

Such behaviour weakens not only our relationships but also the democratic values we claim to defend. The reality is simple: elections are temporary. Political offices have fixed tenures. Governments change. Political alliances shift. Today’s political rivals may become tomorrow’s allies, while today’s allies may become tomorrow’s opponents. History has repeatedly demonstrated that politicians who once exchanged harsh words eventually sit together at negotiation tables in pursuit of shared interests. Yet ordinary citizens often remain trapped in unnecessary hatred long after political leaders have reconciled.This reality offers an important lesson. No politician should be worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence. Political support should never require personal hatred. We can campaign passionately for our preferred candidates while still respecting those who choose differently.

Democracy flourishes when disagreement remains civil. One of the most dangerous habits in politics is inheriting other people’s enemies. Far too often, supporters adopt the personal conflicts of political leaders as though they were their own. People who have never met begin insulting one another on social media, damaging relationships, and sometimes engaging in violence simply because influential figures disagree.Such misplaced loyalty serves no meaningful purpose. Political leaders often possess the opportunity to reconcile, negotiate, and move forward after elections. Their supporters, however, are frequently left with damaged relationships, regret, and lasting divisions within their communities. Wisdom demands that citizens distinguish between political competition and personal relationships. Rather than inheriting hostility, we should cultivate independent judgment.

Judge individuals by their character, integrity, honesty, and personal conduct not merely by the colour of the political party they support. A person’s political affiliation does not automatically define their values, competence, or humanity. Equally important is the need to elevate the quality of our political conversations. Instead of engaging in personal attacks, we should focus on issues that genuinely affect people’s lives. Discussions should revolve around education, healthcare, infrastructure, security, economic growth, employment, agriculture, and accountable governance. These are the matters that determine the future of our nation not endless exchanges of insults. Social media has further amplified political intolerance. Behind anonymous profiles and smartphone screens, many people say things they would never express in person.

Every post, comment, and shared message has the potential either to promote understanding or to deepen division. Responsible citizenship requires restraint, accuracy, and respect, especially during politically sensitive periods. Politics should inspire service, not hostility. Leadership should unite rather than divide. Citizens should be free to disagree without becoming enemies. After all, beyond our political preferences, we remain neighbours, colleagues, business partners, classmates, worshippers, and fellow citizens who share the same hopes for peace, prosperity, justice, and national development. As another political season approaches, let us remember what truly matters. Campaigns will end. Elections will pass. Winners will celebrate, and losers will regroup. But the relationships we preserve, the respect we extend, and the humanity we uphold will remain long after the campaign slogans have faded.

The greatest victory in politics is not defeating an opponent at the polls; it is preserving our values while participating in democracy. Let us choose dialogue over division, understanding over intolerance, and respect over hatred. Above all, let us never forget this timeless principle: Politics should never be more important than humanity. And perhaps the wisest political advice anyone can embrace is this: Never inherit people’s enemies. In doing so, we preserve not only our relationships but also the very spirit of democracy itself.

By: Michael T. Abraham

Opinion

Making the Out-of-School Children Survey Count

Published

2 weeks ago

July 27, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Reliable data may reveal the scale of Nigeria’s out-of-school crisis, but only sustained political will and practical action can ensure that every child is given the opportunity to learn, thrive and contribute to national development.”

The Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, recently announced that the Federal Government, in partnership with the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), will conduct a nationwide household survey to determine the actual number of out-of-school children in Nigeria. The exercise is intended to provide reliable data for evidence-based education policies and targeted interventions. Current estimates put the number of out-of-school children at between 15 million and 20 million, placing Nigeria among the countries with the highest number of children excluded from formal education. At first glance, this is a commendable initiative. One of Nigeria’s greatest developmental challenges has been the absence of accurate and reliable data. Without dependable statistics, planning becomes difficult, implementation inefficient, and evaluation of government programmes almost impossible.

The nation’s actual population also remains uncertain because of the absence of an up-to-date national census. Estimates range from below 200 million to over 250 million, making effective planning a daunting task. Sound policies on education, healthcare, housing, employment and infrastructure all depend on credible population statistics. Against this backdrop, the proposed survey deserves commendation. If government succeeds in generating reliable figures, it will be better positioned to allocate resources equitably, identify areas of greatest need and design interventions based on facts rather than assumptions. Accurate data will also make it easier to monitor progress and assess whether efforts to reduce the number of out-of-school children are achieving the desired results.

However, beyond the good intentions lie important questions. Will state governments provide the enabling environment for an objective and transparent survey? Since education is on the concurrent legislative list, the cooperation of state governments will largely determine the credibility of the exercise. Politics could easily influence the process. States with higher numbers of out-of-school children may qualify for greater intervention funds from the Federal Government and development partners. Would this tempt some states to inflate their figures? On the other hand, high numbers could portray a state government as performing poorly in the education sector. Would some governors therefore seek to understate the figures to protect their image? These concerns are legitimate because whenever statistics are tied to political interests or financial benefits, the temptation to manipulate them cannot be ignored.

Equally important are questions about the survey itself. When will it begin? How long will it last? What methodology will be adopted? Will every household be covered, including those in remote rural communities and areas plagued by insecurity? Does the government have the manpower, funding, technology and security arrangements needed for such a nationwide exercise? Nigeria has witnessed several well-intentioned national programmes that fell short because of poor planning and inadequate logistics. Many Nigerians will remember that the proposed national population census scheduled a few years ago was postponed despite extensive preparations. Funding constraints and logistical challenges contributed to its suspension. What guarantees are there that this survey will not suffer a similar fate? More importantly, what becomes of the findings after the exercise? Nigeria is not short of reports or data collection initiatives.

The recurring challenge has been the lack of political will to translate findings into concrete policies and sustained action. The survey must not become another document gathering dust on government shelves. Instead, it should serve as the basis for measurable interventions, continuous monitoring and improved educational outcomes. Beyond producing accurate figures, the survey must also uncover the reasons children remain outside the classroom. Addressing the crisis requires more than counting affected children. It demands an understanding of the social, economic and cultural factors responsible for the problem. Issues such as the Almajiri system and other practices that discourage formal education should be carefully examined while respecting cultural values and protecting every child’s right to quality education. Poverty remains a major barrier, as many parents cannot afford school-related expenses, forcing children into street trading or child labour

Insecurity has also led to the closure of schools in several communities, depriving thousands of children of learning opportunities.Government must therefore complement the survey with practical measures. Strengthening social protection for vulnerable families, improving school infrastructure, recruiting and retaining qualified teachers, enhancing security around schools and enforcing compulsory basic education are all essential. Equally important is sustained collaboration with traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations and development partners to address the root causes of school exclusion. The proposed survey presents an opportunity to replace guesswork with credible evidence. However, its true value will not be measured by the number of households visited or questionnaires completed. Its success will depend on whether the findings inspire bold policies, adequate funding and sustained action that ensure every Nigerian child, regardless of location or background, has access to quality education. Only then will the exercise move beyond statistics to become a genuine instrument for national development.