Opinion
FG, ASUU And Education Funding
There is no gainsaying the fact that virtually all sectors of the Nigerian economy, including the education sector are in urgent need of attention in terms of human and material resources. The infrastructure has broken down, there is serious security challenge in the northern part of the country while crude oil theft in the Niger Delta has resulted in the country losing over 300,000 barrels of crude daily, or an equivalent of $1 billion to oil thieves without any solution in sight.
But one that touches the common people most is the incessant closure of our universities whenever the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU embarks on strike, like it is currently doing. Though the plethora of problems facing the universities did not start with the present administration, the thinking in most quarters is that education sector needs a lot of boost to discourage the capital flight to other neighbouring African countries and overseas occasioned by Nigerians going outside to seek quality education.
This situation of gross neglect which has brought our education system to the abyss needs to be addressed if our youth could be properly prepared to take leadership roles in future. That education funding has been consigned to the backroom is the main grouse of the ASUU which has been on strike for sometime now, with a vow by its leadership to hold out for as long as the federal government desires, is bad for all stakeholders at this. One, therefore, wonders what the federal government wants to make of the universities it established if it continues to deny them of much needed funds for infrastructure and staff development.
At the last count, Nigeria could boast of 129 universities out of which 51 are privately, owned while 38 are operated by the various state governments, leaving the federal government with 40 universities across the land. It is, however, disturbing that there is no year that academic activities in the federal universities are not disrupted following one disagreement or the other between the federal government and ASUU on issues concerning the well-being of the institutions and by extension our youth who are the students therein.
It is, therefore, sad to note that despite efforts by the ASUU and other associated union, in the system to keep the flag flying, the federal government’s penchant for reneging on agreements reached with the union has been the bane of smooth, uninterrupted academic sessions which we are craving for.
The recent strike embarked upon by the ASUU is a case in point. The union feels short-changed because the federal government would not keep to the terms of an agreement it reached with it in 2009. Reports indicate that the current face-off between ASUU and the federal government was traceable to the latter’s failure to keep faith with the 2009 agreement which it merely did by honouring two out of the demands. It is instructive that the major demand of the university lecturers, the need to improve on the sectoral allocation to education in the annual budget to meet the minimum standard of 26 per cent, as stipulated by the UNESCO, has never been met.
The question which keeps recurring and needing speedy answers is why is, it difficult for the federal government to commit 26 per cent of its annual budget to the education sector, and why is the federal government toying with education in today’s knowledge-driven univers? Failure on the part of the federal government to do this has been the major justification of ASUU in calling out its members from the classrooms without any consideration of the ripple effect of its action on the students and the economy in general. But could ASUU be blamed for seeking to uplift our tertiary institutions from their current state of glorified secondary schools, to proper university status?
Taking into consideration that the agreements which the federal government failed to redeem were entered into in 2009, the ASUU may not be blamed in the current state of affairs, particular by if goings-on in government circles with regard to the revenue accruing to the federal government and disbursement of funds to sundry sectors, is anything to go by. This is why I am aligning myself with those who blame the government for relegating tertiary education. For instance, the average sectoral allocation to the sector between 2000 and 2010 is a paltry 8.12 per cent.
This is very appalling coming from a democratic civilian regime that is expected to do more for such an important sector than the military which allocated an average of 12.87 per cent of its annual budget to education between 1991 and 1996.
This is why students experienced a meteoric rise in fees in tertiary institutions across the country in 2010 which was a strategy adopted by the institutions in their bid to break even. It is thus saddening that the federal government attitude to tertiary education funding contributed to the fact that no Nigerian university could be found among the first 5000 in the world or the first 50 in Africa . All said, the need to boost tertiary education through adequate funding to arrest the on-going brain drain is an obligation that the government cannot run away from. Besides, if the quantum of resources Nigerians spend in seeking qualitative education for their children abroad is anything to go by then our education system is in dire need of a turn-around.
To boost funding for the education sector, the federal government could use a proportion of the excess crude oil revenue to settle the problems of a sector that is clearly the live wire of a progressive society. Treating the education sector otherwise could yield more cultists, armed robbers and kidnappers that help ensure the well-to-do in society sleep with one eye open.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
