Editorial
Averting Legislature, Executive Impasse
The fragile working understanding between the executive arm of government and Nigeria’s legislature, especially the lower chamber of the National Assembly, the House of Representatives risks further estrangement unless both arms demonstrate tact, maturity and understanding in handling issues of national interest.
Recently, the House of Representatives summoned the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Jonathan to appear before it and provide answers to the growing insecurity in the land. The House, like most Nigerians are troubled by the seeming helplessness of the federal government in checking the excesses of the Islamic fundamentalist group, Boko Haram.
On the last count, the Islamist group is said to have killed more than 1,000 citizens and foreigners in numerous terror attacks on public institutions including media houses and the United Nations House in Abuja , Nigeria’s Seat of power, since 2009.
Only last weekend, three such attacks on Churches in Kaduna and Yobe left scores dead and many more in reprisal attacks. With as many as 101 reportedly killed and further threat of sectarian violence, the Kaduna State government has again imposed dusk to dawn curfew which it relaxed two days after last Sunday’s terror attacks on churches.
These killings, no doubt portend great danger to national security and indeed the unity of Nigeria and ought to attract commited action by all concerned, particularly, the federal and state governments which have the constitutional duty to protect lives and properties of the citizenry.
Surely, it was for this same concern that the House of Representatives summoned President Jonathan to appear, ostensibly to explain what the executive arm has, thus far, done to check the excesses of the Boko Haram menace. It is, even more so, because of the religious colouration now being introduced into what initially seemed a misguided rascality by a group of miscreants opposed to modern education which many thought Boko Haram represented.
However, the stance of the House that the president must personally appear before it and not to be represented by anyone else appears to be a bit over-reaching. The president of the country is the Chief Security Officer, but depends on briefs by constitutionally recognised officials to function.
Any where in the world, a democratically elected president enjoys the right of being represented by proxy and ought not be pressured into responding to only an aspect of countless variables responsible for a peaceful and progressive country.
In the United States of American (USA), for instance, the president’s visit to Congress is either ceremonial or discretional and never based on orders. Even so, the president enjoys the constitutional privilege of assigning the affected officials to represent him in similar fashion as delegated legislation.
This is why The Tide thinks that the Honourable House should not be rigid about personal appearance of the president before it. Instead that lower chamber should raise the required questions the president needs to provide answers to. The important issues is for answers to be provided by the executive arm, with the approval of the president.
More importantly, the invitation is likely to set a dangerous precedence that would see successive House summon the president, at will, over even the most trivial issues. Such situation should be discouraged. This is because, all members of the executive arm, especially Ministers, were screened and endorsed by the National Assembly and ought to be identified and questioned on any issues affecting their various briefs.
The Tide believes that every answer sought could be provided without necessarily subjecting the presidency to such drilling. This is why the House must relax the rigidity on the personal appearance of Mr President before it. No other president of Nigeria has been so subjected.
Besides, the presidency is not an individual but symbolises and should symbolise the political authority of Nigeria and needs to be treated as such. Insisting that Mr President appears before the lower chamber of the National Assembly in person, is indeed unflattering.
While we appreciate the importance of the questions likely to be raised, we nontheless think that the appearance of Mr President, in person, should be at the Commander-in-Chief’s discretion because any where in all democracies a president’s proxy is indeed the president. And such views, the president’s views.
Editorial
Checkmating ‘One-Chance’ Menaces In PH
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
-
News3 days agoRSG Targets Nine Million Residents in Mosquito Net Distribution Campaign
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoAiyedatiwa Signs New Electricity Bill
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoNLNG Commissions Research And Innovation Centre In RSU
-
Maritime2 days agoMarine Minister Commends President Tinubu On NPERA Bill Assent
-
News3 days agoKenPoly Holds Eight Convocations, August 29
-
News3 days agoRSG Begins Another Phase of Projects Commissioning Today
-
News3 days agoRMAFC Completes Revenue Sharing Review, Proposes New Pay
-
Maritime2 days agoNAGAFF Petitions IGP Over Alleged Maritime Police Harassment
