Connect with us

Opinion

Ada-George, Iwofe Roads: Can The Contractors Deliver?

Published

on

The contractor handling the dualisation of Ada-George Road had assured the Rivers State Government that work on the road would be completed this year while work is yet to commence on the dualisation of Iwofe Road. Given their terrible conditions, our staff writer, Calista Ezeaku and photographer, Prince Obinna asked residents of the areas what their thoughts are. Their responses.

 

Mr Bright Kamalu, business man

Work on the road is in progress. At least, the construction company, has been trying to make sure that some areas are motorable. At least, they are doing something.

The difficulty we encounter is that when people close from work, there will be hold up, but with other small roads around, we can manage it.

We are appealing to government to, at least, ginger the contractor, let them do something between now and December, so that by next year, we know that we are done.

Mr Justice Ichienwo, student, University of Port Harcourt

I think for now, it seems  I am the only one feeling bad about the road. I don’t know if other people are also feeling bad. For me, I think that the work on the road (Ada-George Road) is not moving as I expected it. I don’t know if government is owing or if government has not mobilised them (the construction company) or if the problem is from the contractor. So, I don’t know. There is rumour that they (the construction company) need mobilisation. I think  if mobilisation is the problem, government should just look into it so that from now till December, the contractor can do something about it.

Whenever there is rain, there will be flood every where. Most of the time, I fold my trouser, remove my shoes, just to cross over to my place. This has lasted for at least a year and two months.

If money is the problem, they should give them the money so that we will know that the contractor is the one owing the people.

Mr Goodness Sunday, treasurer, Keke Owners Association of Nigeria,  Ada-George Branch.

This place has been disturbing us for about three years now. Sometimes, hold up will be everywhere, we’ll have no access to go anywhere. Like Iwofe Road, we have not been going there often, right from this year. When it rains, you cannot go there. Like Ada George, even people that are constructing the road are not doing the work the way they are supposed to do it. When you go there, sometimes they will take water and block everywhere, in the name of doing the work.

Nevertheless, we are still hoping they can do something better. For now, our work is not moving well because of the road. I want the state government to talk to the company handling this work (the construction company), that they should fasten this job. They cannot be working one place. It is getting to four years since they started constructing this place, till now the work is not completed.

So, I want government to look into the matter, meet with the director of the company. They should hasten this job so that they can be able to go another place, not staying in one place for about four years without achieving the purpose of coming there.

Government should help even on this Iwofe Road. It is very bad from St John’s down here (Ada George Road junction). I paid N100.00 which is something that I can pay N50.00 to reach. But I paid N100.00. Sometimes, you can stay here for more than one or two hours, you will not able to get motor from here to Iwofe. Not to talk of Eliparanwo, that place is ‘no go area’. We are suffering a lot in this area. So, we need  government to come and help us, so that we can benefit from government.

Evangelist Joseph S. Nwodu, missionary.

My experience on this road is so bad, although government is trying. But we ask the government to put more effort to make sure they facilitate the road. The road is too bad, so as a result of it, motorists have increased the transport fare. Sometimes, they will charge you N200.00, from Whimpey junction to Ngbuakali, Eliparanwo. Some other times, they will charge you N100.00. Last night (Tuesday night), we paid N150.00. They (drivers) charge what suits them because of the bad road.

So, I want government to do something this raining season. Otherwise, businesses and social life will suffer, and this will increase the problem in the state. When somebody is not regular in areas of his assignment, you will know that it is a problem. When it rains, people don’t come to church the way they are supposed to because of the bad road. So the nature of the road is affecting moral life of the people.

So, we want government to put more effort on what they have started. Let them try to finish it.

Mr Edward Shan, business man.

I can say the government is trying. The governor is doing fine. Every government must initiate a  project and at the beginning of the initiation of the project, there must be some minor hiccups.

So, I think the Governor of Rivers State, Rt Hon Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi is really trying his best. So, people should learn how to be patient withr government. I believe within the shortest period, the road will be completed. The road is not all that bad. It is a normal thing with any road that is under construction. Of course, there must be some minor inconveniences.

So, I am still appealing to the people to be patient with the government because I believe within the shortest period, the road will be in good shape.

The contractor should try and hasten the job for the convenience of the road users.

Mr  Micheal Nwachi, automobile mechanic.

In fact, since this road got bad like this, we have remained jobless. I’m even looking for a job in a company right now because people don’t pass this road again (Iwofe Road). It is only the big vehicles that pass this road. You cannot see any small car pass this road, assuming the person wants to get to Iwofe. They will always be looking for other routes to get to Iworfe. No small car can pass this road. Even the big cars find it difficult to pass the road because the road is terribly bad. In fact, I have never seen a road like this in the whole Rivers State that is as bad as this Iwofe Road.

So, that has kept everybody here off business. Many of them have parked out. These shops here were very busy but if you look at the shops now, you will see that all of them are under lock and key. Only one is operating there because of the road. So,iftis a terrible situation.

You waste all your time on the road, waste your fuel and everything. In fact, we are not happy. We feel very bad, we feel as if we are not part of the state, we not included. This area seems as if we are isolated from what is happening in other areas of the state.

So, we pray that government one day, will remember this Iwofe Road. Though we heard that the contract has been awarded but we have not seen anything happening, nothing. My car gets bad each and every movement. If you fix your thyroid, bolt joint, and shock absorbers, before one or two weeks, you go back to mechanic workshop to do the same job again. So, the road is really making car owners spend more money maintaining their cars. Some have even parked their cars. They use public transport to go out for business because of the way the road has spoilt their cars. So, it is really a bad situation.

We really want government to come to our rescue, because this road is a government road. It is a major road linking so many companies in this area. So, if government will come and put this road in order, the economic situation of the state will be boosted. The companies operating here are paying more tax to the government. So the government has the right (obligation) to come and fix this road.

Marilyn Esien, teacher.

It has been something else going to school with the bad road. We have to trek a long distance because no car is passing this way (Iwofe Road). You have to trek down, sometimes you swim the water with your legs. We (the school) has lost a lot of children because of this road. Parents say their children cannot pay through here so they decided to change their children to other schools. The other ones that are still trying to come, school bus sometimes will sink here. You will now transfer them from one bus to another to pass this place.

Whenever it rains, you have to wait extra two hours for the water to come down or turn round to follow Eliparanwo. So, any time rain falls here, it is ‘no go area’.

So, I want government to do something about this road. At least, let them put it in their own budget that this road is one of the roads they will finish before this tenure finishes.

Mr Livinus Onyenwike, civil servant.

The thing is a very big problem, because going to work, you must have to trek from here to where you can enter motor because no motor will agree to carry you along here because of the bad road.

Let us emulate the western world. Because in the western world where our people go to buy property, things are not like this. If they are like this, they cannot go there to do any thing.

I don’t even believe that this road will still be like this up till now. So, it is not good. We are not animals. We are human beings. We are supposed to emulate good things from the western world. We have the money, we have the resources, we have everything. So, we are supposed to do better things. This road is an eye sour. Many shops are closed. Many people are parking out. If rain falls, flood will take over every where. If you enter the compound where I am living, you will see how we heaped blanks of wood to cross over to our rooms. It is because of bad road, it is not good.

Government must have to do something. We are all human beings. We need good health and good environment.

Continue Reading

Opinion

One Attack Too Many 

Published

on

Quote: “Ogoniland does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create more opportunities, empower youths and build a better future.”

The latest attack by Chief Gani Topba on the President of KAGOTE and Chief Executive Officer of Giolee Global Resources Ltd, Chief Lesi Maol, appears to have opened another troubling chapter in the politics of leadership and influence in Ogoniland. While disagreements are inevitable, the frequency and manner of attacks directed at individuals or organisations contributing to Ogoni development should concern every stakeholder. The concluded extraordinary meeting of Ogoni stakeholders in Bori was convened to deliberate on challenges confronting the people, including insecurity, farmers-herders clashes, youth disunity, education and development. It also considered harmonising the numerous youth organisations operating across Ogoniland under a strong and representative umbrella capable of giving Ogoni youths a more coordinated voice. One would have expected such an initiative to attract constructive contributions, especially from those with reservations about it.

Instead, the gathering and its organisers have come under criticism, raising a fundamental question: what exactly is wrong with Ogoni stakeholders coming together to discuss problems affecting their people? If there are legitimate concerns about the meeting, its organisers or resolutions, such concerns should be supported by facts and subjected to constructive engagement rather than personalised attacks. Leadership is demonstrated through service, sacrifice, participation and results. If Chief Gani Topba believes the stakeholders’ meeting was unnecessary or lacked legitimacy, nothing prevents him from convening another meeting and demonstrating that he can attract traditional rulers, professionals, academics, clergy and youths. Different approaches to development should therefore be allowed to compete on their merits.

The proposal for a unified youth platform should equally not be presented as an attempt to silence Ogoni youths. Rather, it should be examined against the reality of numerous organisations claiming to represent different segments of Ogoni youths. Too many competing organisations can create confusion, weaken collective bargaining power and make it difficult for genuine concerns affecting young people to receive coordinated attention. A credible umbrella body, if properly constituted and broadly accepted, could strengthen the voice of Ogoni youths and provide an organised platform for employment, education, skills acquisition, security and governance. Ogoniland has experienced enough institutional fragmentation. Its history contains painful lessons about divisions that allow personal interests, leadership struggles and competing platforms to overshadow collective objectives. The present generation should learn that destroying institutions one does not control damages society.

The question should be: who benefits when Ogoni youths remain divided and every attempt at unity is interpreted as rivalry? Against this background, KAGOTE deserves objective scrutiny rather than blanket condemnation. Any organisation with influence must be accountable, but accountability is different from a campaign aimed at delegitimising initiatives associated with its leadership. Chief Lesi Maol’s activities through KAGOTE and Giolee Global Resources Ltd have attracted attention in areas including skills development, education, youth empowerment and community support. Such interventions should be assessed on their impact and encouraged where they serve the public good. Those who believe Chief Maol is not doing enough should not stop at criticism. They should show Ogoni what they can do better. Where are the alternative skills programmes? Where are the educational interventions? Where are the youth empowerment schemes? Where are the community development initiatives?

It is easy to criticise someone who is building; it is harder to mobilise resources and sustain programmes that benefit ordinary people. This is not to suggest that Chief Maol or KAGOTE should be immune from criticism. No leader or institution should be beyond scrutiny, and legitimate questions about accountability must be welcomed. But responsible criticism should be based on facts, evidence and alternative ideas. Personal attacks and attempts to destroy initiatives simply because their leadership is not controlled by particular interests cannot provide the solutions Ogoniland needs. What is unfolding is bigger than one meeting, one statement or even two individuals. It reflects a broader contest over influence and leadership. If anyone believes KAGOTE is taking Ogoni in the wrong direction, the response is to present a better direction. If anyone believes Lesi Maol is not doing enough, the answer is to demonstrate what more can be done. Ogoni does not need leaders competing over who can destroy another’s platform; it needs leaders competing over who can create opportunities, improve education, promote security, empower youths and contribute to development.

The people are looking beyond rhetoric. They are examining records, observing programmes and measuring results. No individual owns the permanent right to speak for Ogoni or determine which organisation must survive or collapse. Ogoni must replace the politics of personal control with a culture of ideas, service, accountability and measurable achievement. Differences should produce better alternatives, not destruction. Every Ogoni leader and stakeholder should ask whether his actions are strengthening the region or deepening divisions. Ogoni needs people who can build bridges, institutions, opportunities and hope. Those who genuinely love Ogoni should support what is good, correct what is wrong and offer better alternatives. The future of Ogoni will not be secured by destroying its builders, but by encouraging more people to build.

onest people can reach different conclusions based on different experiences and information. Public debate should therefore remain respectful, evidence-based and open to correction. Truth is strengthened by honest examination, not insults, suspicion or personal attacks. The phrase “Truth has no agenda” carries a powerful message. Truth does not belong to any political party, ethnic group, religion or ideology. It cannot be permanently owned or manipulated by those in power. Governments change, institutions rise and fall, and public opinion shifts, but truth remains indifferent to popularity.The real test of character comes when speaking honestly threatens influence, privilege or personal advantage. It is easy to defend justice when there is nothing to lose. It is far more difficult when the truth may cost us something. That is when conscience must rise above convenience.

Society must therefore cultivate a culture where integrity is valued more than comfort and accountability is welcomed rather than feared. Leaders should learn to accept criticism without hostility, while citizens should express disagreement responsibly. Progress becomes difficult when honest questions are treated as acts of disloyalty. Ultimately, every society must choose the future it desires. A nation built on silence cannot sustain justice, while a community where comfort consistently outweighs conscience risks making injustice ordinary. But people committed to truth, even when inconvenient, lay the foundation for stronger institutions, trustworthy leadership and lasting progress. The call is not to condemn those who succeed or to glorify perpetual criticism. It is to remember that privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good. Truth has no hidden agenda. It seeks neither applause nor favour. It simply asks to be spoken, defended and lived. When truth is silenced by comfort, everyone eventually pays the price.

By:  King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

When Comfort Silences The Truth  

Published

on

Quote: “Privilege should never silence principle, influence should never replace integrity, and personal gain should never outweigh the public good.”

There is an old saying that truth does not fear investigation. Genuine truth neither depends on applause nor seeks permission to exist. It remains constant whether celebrated or rejected, defended or ignored. Yet, in today’s society, truth often competes with comfort, convenience, loyalty and personal interest. This raises an important question: Can a person remain objective after beginning to benefit from the very system he once criticised? Throughout history, reform movements have been driven by courageous individuals willing to challenge injustice despite personal risks. Their commitment to truth sometimes cost them popularity, comfort, freedom and even their lives. History has also recorded instances where influential voices became quieter after receiving appointments, promotions, contracts, political favours or other advantages.

While motivations cannot always be known, such patterns remind us that personal benefit can sometimes influence public conviction. Human beings naturally seek security, stability and opportunities for themselves and their families. There is nothing wrong with success or advancement. The concern arises when personal comfort replaces public responsibility, or privilege becomes a reason to ignore problems affecting others. One of the greatest dangers facing society is not only corruption or poor governance but the normalisation of silence. Systems rarely collapse overnight. They deteriorate gradually when people who know better decide that speaking the truth is no longer worth the personal cost. Every society therefore depends on citizens willing to ask difficult questions, demand accountability and defend justice, regardless of who benefits or feels uncomfortable.

A person who benefits from a broken system may become less inclined to challenge it. This is not true of everyone, and individuals should not be judged without evidence. Many principled people continue to advocate reform while working within imperfect institutions. Nevertheless, personal interests can sometimes soften criticism, dilute conviction or redirect attention from uncomfortable realities.Perhaps the greatest threat to truth is not open opposition but quiet compromise. Censorship is easy to recognise; silence purchased through convenience is harder to detect. When people gradually stop asking questions, demanding transparency or defending principles they once considered important, society should ask whether something has changed. Perspectives may genuinely evolve with new information, but incentives can also influence what people say—or choose not to say.

This is why citizens should not place blind trust in personalities. Ideas, principles and actions should be examined independently. Loyalty to individuals must never exceed loyalty to truth. Political affiliation, professional status, financial success or social influence should not exempt anyone from accountability. A healthy democracy depends on independent thinking, not unquestioning allegiance.The responsibility to speak truth does not belong only to journalists, activists, judges, religious leaders or opposition politicians. It belongs to every citizen. The teacher who refuses to manipulate facts, the public servant who rejects corruption, the business owner who acts with integrity, the parent who teaches honesty and the young person who chooses principle over popularity all contribute to a more just society. However, defending truth also requires humility.

We must not assume that everyone who disagrees with us has been compromised.

By: Michael  Abraham

Continue Reading

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s  Outburst

Published

on

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection. 

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Trending