Opinion
Nigerian Content Act And the Amnesty Programme
The oil and gas industry in Nigeria plays a crucial role to the sustenance of the nation and helps fuel her economic development. The industry has been widely described as the nations live-wire and literature abound on its role and significance.
The amnesty programme was designed to help bring sustainable development to the Niger Delta and build the human capacities of militants who embraced it.
Nonetheless, an estimated $8 billion is spent annually on servicing the industry such as fabrication, engineering, procurement, construction, Front End Engineering Design (FEED), conceptual designs and seismic studies. This figure is projected to hit $15 billion within the next few years.
Regrettably, despite these huge sums of money spent in servicing the industry, only a very little proportion of the accruable profit is spent in Nigeria. Bulk of the amount is repatriated abroad, where most of the equipment is manufactured; and providing employment opportunities for citizens of other countries.
The major reason for this situation has been attributed to low local content (LC), which most of the service contracts are awarded to foreign firms because local and indigenous firms lack the requisite skills, technical expertise, manpower and production capacity and capability to compete favourably.
Reasons for this are: deficient capitalisation arising from the tendency of Nigerian entrepreneurs to operate as “one man” business, capital and structural deficiencies associated with poor training and low managerial ability and inability to attract funds due to lack of suitable collateral and positive corporate image.
Low technological capacity; lack of funding from financial institutions, inadequate and incoherent policies/legislations; inadequate infrastructure; unfavourable business climate; lack of partnering between indigenous contractors and technically competent foreign companies, the inability of commercial banks to provide tenured loans to indigenous firms to execute project and that of Nigerian firms to foster appropriate alliances and partnerships with foreign firms, are attributable to the low local content service in the oil and gas sector.
Historically, Nigerians have had very little share of the country’s oil wealth and there was an urgent need to reverse this trend as the country’s return to democracy eleven years after.
To address this anomaly, the Federal Government of Nigeria in the early 2000s introduced the Local Content (LC) policy, christened Nigeria Content (NC) and it was primarily aimed at enhancing increased participation of local indigenous firms in oil and gas industry. The policy was targeted at transforming the industry through the development of indigenous capacity in the area of manpower development, facilities and infrastructure towards ensuring that a higher representation of local indigenous companies participate actively in the industry.
It was also aimed at reforming the industry into becoming the economic hub for promoting higher small and medium scale participation, job creation and base for industry growth; as well as for checking capital flight away from the country. The crucial need for this policy cannot be overemphasised and even in recent times, the Speaker of Nigeria’s House of Representative was quoted as saying:
“It is important to note that while the oil and gas industry clearly dominates the Nigerian economy, a successful local content policy must be part of the comprehensive industrial and economic growth strategy for Nigeria as a whole … it should include both a plan for domestic capacity building and infrastructure development to broaden the national industrial base.”
The Nigeria content law, which was signed into law by President Goodluck Jonathan, will boost the amnesty programme of the federal government if adhered strictly to by stakeholders and those implementing the content.
The acting executive secretary of the Nigerian Content Board was quoted as saying that the Nigerian Content and the post amnesty programme are both designed primarily to give jobs to more Nigerians, particularly in the oil and gas sector.
The greatest challenge facing the implementation of the act is the lack of awareness within Nigeria and slow methods of its implementation.
The Rivers Government should key-into this noble and very important act not only to provide jobs for those militants but to improve the human and infrastructural capabilities of the Rivers man to enable him tap into this gold mine.
Briggs Resides in Port Harcourt.
David Briggs
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
