Opinion
Obasanjo and Election Pessimism
Be not rash with the mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter any things before God: For God is in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let they words be few” Ecclesiastes 5:2. this quotation likened to Olusegun Obasanjo’s allusion about election in Nigeria
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has ruled Nigeria for eight years and therefore thought that in a democratic setting such as ours, nothing good can take place.
But that is a misconception of the highest order.. Life is dynamic. The statement credited to former President Olusegun Obasanjo in far away United States of America that even Jesus Christ cannot conduct credible elections in Nigeria is barbaric in this era of advancement for all facets of life. Such statement is tantamount to undermining the effort of President Goodluck Jonathan who is out to conduct credible elections based on his romance with electoral reforms process.
On the other hand, the statement is satanic; capable of causing tension in the realm of Christianity. It is ridiculous to note that our past leaders or rulers are pessimistic about the future of Nigerian state.
Which means without them nothing is credible in Nigeria. No wonder, Olusegun Obasanjo wanted to elongate his tenure for personal selfish interest, as the long serving president of Nigeria.
We must think Nigerian projects beyond personality interest, if we must achieve any tangible result as a nation. Well, Christians would not go to war with him; but thank God that he did not say such remark about Mohammed; if not he would have returned to see his Otta farms and houses on fire.
It is high time our past leaders stop voicing out inflammatory statements that is capable of destroying our hope in this country. Look, in United States, Jimmy Carter, the former president, is still very relevant in American dreams even at his old age. Bill Clinton and George Bush are not also left out, you see them supporting President Barrack Obama’s policies, but in Nigeria the reverse is the case; they want to run the incumbent down. As a nation, we must see the need to improve on the areas we are not doing well.
Ghana, our sister country in the same region, organised the best election in Africa and we are not bordered. If elections in Nigeria are “do or die affairs”, expect more death in 2011 general elections; now that the proliferation of small arms are unrestricted in our society. It is time for past leaders to support electoral reforms that is seen as hope to credible elections in Nigeria. Nigerians should look beyond party or personal interest when it comes to the yearnings of the people. Our elders and leaders should not see themselves as the best leaders because of the privilege endowed on them. Pessimism based on sentiments is a threat to the purposeful nation building. The future has many things to offer to Nigeria as a nation and as a people. There is hope for Nigeria. Well, the statement has exposed to Nigerians and to the world the crafty nature of Nigerian leaders in terms of doing the right thing for Nigeria.
The statement by Obasanjo is in tandem with this biblical allusion; “can there any good thing come out of Nazareth” (John 1:46b). but in the end, Jesus the Messiah came out of Nazareth and Nathanael was bewildered based on his prediction of Nazareth. Likewise one day, even next year. Chief Olusegun Obasanjo will see the best election in Nigeria, more than the pervious ones ever conducted at gun point.
Like Lai Mohammed the AC Publicity Secretary has prayed, that God should prolong the life of former President Olusegun Obasanjo to witness credible elections in Nigeria.
Thus, putting things right in Nigeria, we must have Nigerian dreams. I have stumbled on two dreams that should be actualised by President, Goodluck Jonathan; “Adoption of electoral reforms and power for Nigerians.
Our past failures should be a springboard for national success. Democracy is not dictatorship by its inclination. Let the leaders and the led contribute to a successful future of Nigeria. Let us forget the pessimistic statement of Obasanjo and together build Nigeria for a better tomorrow. Let us support the president and other hard working governors to move this country forward . There is no K-leg again. Say No, to pessimism.
Ogwuonuonu resides in PH.
Evang. Frank Ogwuonuonu
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Rivers1 day ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics5 days agoAtiku Demands INEC Officials’ Probe Over Alleged Voters’ Register Manipulation
-
Politics5 days ago
2027: Attack Electoral Officials, Face Full Weight Of Law, INEC Warns
-
Sports5 days ago
‘Nigeria, Very Poor In CAF Inter-Club Competitions’
-
Sports5 days agoNFF Celebrates First Nigerian CAF General Secretary
