Opinion
The Scourge Of Examination Bodies
The West African Examination Council (WAEC) is well recognised by many people in virtually all the Anglophone West African sub-region.
The reason for this popularity is because the body is responsible for the conduct of examinations thus determining the fate of thousands of candidates in the pursuit of their academic and professional ideals. The increase of examination fees by WAEC in recent times to N500 and above therefore should reflect the improved chance of candidates to register for examinations with ease and the accomplishment of their goals without putting too much strain on the candidates’ families and guardians.
But instead of council to alleviate the financial pressure exerted on the people it has failed to consider the inequality that exists amongst the people. The increase in examination fees implicitly means that any candidates from a poor family may not be able to register for the Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination and other academic and professional examinations such as JAMB, Business Health and Catering examinations. This has been made more cumbersome by the cost of their overhead expenses.
The breakdown of the expenses is as follows: examination fee N500.00 commissions on postal order N500.00; self-addressed stamped envelopes N100.00; passport photographs and transport expenses N1,500.00 or above. This is a conservative estimate, it may be higher in some instances.
But the above ordeal which WAEC has made candidates to go through can be abolished or minimised by the creation of cash centres where candidates can pay cash and at the same time collect their entry forms instead of being subjected to other tedious procedures like buying of bank drafts stamps etc.
There is need for WAEC to charge less fees to enable candidates from less privileged “ homes to participate fully during examination periods. In this era of providing education for all, it would be necessary that the reduction of examination fees by WAEC would also be beneficiary and benevolent in achieving this objective since by so doing many candidates would enter into examinations. The Joint Admission and Matriculation Board has been observed to be another high profit making body. A conservative estimate of JAMB’s harvest on sales of forms for 2009 UME and PCE examinations alone was put at ten million naira (N10m) considering the figure of 300,000 and 400,000 for the two examinations respectively. This amount does not include fees paid by those applying for direct entry admission.
According to MR. CHARLES NWOKO said that government should release NECO examination form prices, apart from skyrocket the price that if we compare the market women who is selling in the market all things suppose to be minimised while WAEC charging over N14,000.00 to N16,000.00 being school fees for the year.
It is therefore mandatory to ask JAMB and WAEC to publish their audit of accounts income and expenditure, this is to enable us assess the financial commitment they have put into the examination body and to ascertain and justify their duties.
WAEC and JAMB should be able to convince all the candidates who enter for examinations of the amount of money spent apart from the subvention received from the government. And why they should charge more than expectation for each of its examinations; why it considers other expense to be shouldered by the candidates themselves, the cost of printing of examination papers notwithstanding for example, the price of the GCE form N 6,200, NECO N 7,200 and UME N 5,000.
With the exorbitant cost of examination fees, one would have thought that everything is guaranteed, but this is far from the truth with every passing year, cases of delay in receiving examination notices and examination results is rampant thus deflating the aspiration of candidates for academic and career pursuits.
Nigerians, especially during this period of examination always go the very length to cheat their fellow compatriots. Observers said that some post offices and other establishment where JAMB and PCE forms are offered for sales to candidates are being hoarded by unscrupulous officials. These forms are instead sold at astronomical prices, thus making extra money for themselves at the detriment of the candidates.
However, the only solution to this problem of loss of confidence in this examination body is to reconstitute it. The sub-regional governments should re-organise WAEC and ensure that it performs its duties and objectives as required of it. Workers of the examination bodies should be disciplined and made accountable to the candidates whose aspiration they need to guarantee. The profits made by the examination body should be re-invested in purchasing printing machines, materials and provision of conducive conditions during examinations and for sending prompt notices, information and results to candidates on time.
Prince Sintrials Etim
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers1 day ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics1 day ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured1 day agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News1 day ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro1 day ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
Politics1 day ago
APC Chieftain Canvasses Support For Tinubu Rally In Port Harcourt
-
News1 day agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
