Opinion
International Community And Nigerian Politics
Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, gave the impression that the international community is in support of President Buhari’s bid to re-contest the presidency in 2019. Nigerians are asking: who are the international community that are giving such support? As a foreign affairs minister, Onyeama is in a position to know what the opinion of the global community is towards Nigeria. His perception can also be wrong.
Going by the reactions of a large number of Nigerians since that statement was made, the reality is, either that Nigerians are being mocked, or that Onyeama’s reading of the minds of the international community is wrong. It cannot be said that such opinion reflects the collective will of Nigerians. Majority of Nigerians are sad and hungry.
The relevance of a democracy lies in the opportunity it provides for people to make choices with regards to who leads them and takes decisions on issues affecting them. Voting process is the means by which the people express their right to choose. But a situation where the right of the people of a sovereign nation, especially with regards to the choice of a President, is subverted by an international community, that becomes an affront to democracy.
What is gradually emerging under the guise of democracy is a situation where powerful influences, global and local, drown the voices, choices and will of the common people. Such powerful influences who often throw their weight about in serious national issues, include the nebulous international community and their local collaborators. Their operational strategies include the flying of a kite, to test reactions of the people towards their plans and schemes, as well as the use of intimidation and blackmail to drown the voices of possible opponents.
A part of the scheme of enemies of genuine democracy includes holding the presidency to ransom thus forming a parallel government within a government. Hardly would any of those involved in the operation of a cryptocracy ever admit that there is a parallel government, but this comes about when the opportunity arises.
Opportunity for the operation of a cryptocracy comes when a chief executive is seen to be weak, ill, taking sides with weak interest groups, or placing the interests of some powerful groups in jeopardy. Often, the interests of dominant powerful groups, or placing the interests of some powerful groups in jeopardy. Often, the interests of dominant powerful groups whose members or representatives constitute the cabal, are made to represent national interests. Thus public finances and resources can be expended in the pursuit of some private agenda and projects, even when the masses are hungry.
Local powerful interest groups are usually the fronts of some international groups whose economic and political tentacles penetrate into vulnerable nations. Therefore, reference to international community is usually synonymous with foreign economic interest groups whose operations are facilitated by local politicians. Such local politicians are not only the proxies of foreign interests, but they also form the nucleus of the local cryptocracy or cabal.
Currently we have an example of external manipulation of the Nigerian economy via international community in the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB). Rather than the original Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), the PIGB is a clever re-designed scheme which, in its ultimate implementation would peace Nigeria, particularly the oil-producing communities, in jeopardy. According to Dr Okey Ellah, “some individuals appear to believe the oil must belong to them so they have been trying legal tricks and means to acquire ownership.” A situation where Nigeria’s sold off to a few Nigerians and their foreign sponsors is a bad omen.
With regards to the purported global support for Buhari’s re-election, Dr Junaid Mohammed told us that “those who have a connection with the international community, know that it is nothing but contempt for the Buhari administration because of poor performance”. With wrong people in strategic and sensitive positions, is there any ill that cannot be foisted on Nigerians?
The only section of the global community that can support President Buhari’s continuation power is the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), for reasons which any honest Nigerian would not find hard to know. There is a strong need to steer the fate of Nigeria away from the grips of foreign interest groups as well as from the stranglehold of local cabals. While we may not know who the cabals are, we do know that they use “ Presidency” as a ready and clever cover in their operations. Someone once asked: “who is the Presidency?” Corruption can wear different masks, especially when fighting.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Rivers13 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News12 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
