Opinion
Strategies For Empowerment
In society there is what is known as sponsored social mobility whereby the progressive development of a youth is enhanced by a god father. There is also contest social mobility whereby a youth struggles on his own through fierce contest with others without help from anyone. God-fathers include wealthy and caring parents, politicians and philanthropists. Youths who show outstanding talents and abilities in football, music and other activities can be identified, picked up and sponsored by individuals or organizations and then rise to great positions in life. There are several such examples and youths of humble backgrounds have risen up and can become presidents.
Another strategy of personal empowerment common among ambitious but helpless youths involves trading off some organs in their body as a sacrifice for success. Youths have been known to sell one of their kidneys or some pints of blood in order to accomplish some goals. Sublimation is a similar sacrifice of diverting and utilizing the generative power for the purpose of making some outstanding success. Sublimation for religious purposes is quite common but enforced celibacy is not synonymous with piety, just as it is condemnable to squander the generative power and who remained single and childless in old age often adopt children or give their wealth for charity or humanitarian purposes.
A very unpleasant aspect of personal empowerment through sublimation can be described as Lady Macbeth’s syndrome, whereby an individual pledges loyalty to some dirty gods for the sake of power or wealth. Listen to Lady Macbeth: “Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts! Unsex me here, and fill me from the crown to the toe top full of divest cruelty; make thick my blood, stop up the access and passage to remorse that no compunctious visitings of nature shake my fell purpose …” Youths have been known to pledge loyalty to various cult groups for the purpose of protection or advancement. Who would blame them when they see no alternative prospect in a cult like society! Adults often lure youths into “Ufemfe society”.
There is also lateral social mobility which involves expanded and large-scale sponsorship of youths of some particular geo-political zones, through scholarship awards, recruitment and appointments into strategic positions in the country. “Quota system” of appointments and promotions is a part of the strategy. People employed in state public services are given accelerated promotions and then transferred to federal civil service as Directors, such that their other struggling counterparts remain their subordinates.
This system of empowerment commonest in the civil service has been called nepotism of which the god-fathers are politicians. This obnoxious strategy of empowerment has undermined merit, productivity and promoted fraud, whereby those who feel short-changed resort to self-help. This is a principal reason why there is such unspeakable degree of fraudulent practices in the public services. An irony of the peculiar Nigerian strategy is that while the elite of some zones push up and plant their people in strategic positions, other elite take pride in pulling down their own indigenes. There are those who even encourage them to demolish as many struggling ones as they can. Thus sadism, revenge, animosity and criminality increase in some places.
We would miss much if we do not look into the situations in our universities, because, the “Nigerian factor” shows its ugly face even in that sector. For example, honest and serious research efforts are not utilized, while research grants often go to those with political connections. We may also ask why a large number of Nigerian youths go to Ghana and other countries to study. Should admissions process into Nigerian universities not be re-visited and scrutinized? Similarly, assessment and graduation processes beg for restructuring, like everything else. Can we ask why some graduates of our universities are not able to speak or write good English language?
Empowerment strategies go beyond sponsored admissions, graduations and appointments. Since professors now retire at the age of 70 and can live happily thereafter with full salaries and fringe benefits, does political empowerment strategy not play roles in the process? Can geo-political zones not produce “quota professors” under a rat-race system? The situation has become so worrisome that foreign universities are currently quite alarmed at the rate of proliferation of professors in Nigerian universities. Rivers State governor must be commended for stopping the practice of retaining retired lecturers as contractors and consultants, taking double salaries. We need a holistic restructuring.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
