Opinion
Politicians As Confusionists
In the classifications of management and leadership styles, the politician comes under the category of the wheeler-dealer. The wheeler-dealer is not always a con-man but more often, he is a hyper active and hyper-intelligent person, with head full of many ideas.
People come into leadership positions from various walks of life and with training in various professions, but in the area of political leadership, laymen, king-makers, money-bags and godfathers play significant roles. It is quite expensive to contest for political leadership, and therefore, political aspirants have to be very rich people, or get sponsorship from “money-bags” and godfathers.
It is needless to say that those who sponsor political aspirants, do so as an investment which can be quite risky if the aspirant fails. A part of the spending by political aspirants includes lobbying and getting the support of political king-makers and godfathers in various geo-political zones and power blocks. Therefore, when a political aspirant emerges as a political leader after a successful election, he is rarely alone but often remains a hostage of those who placed or “planted” him there.
A successful politician emerging as a leader through a do-or-die process cannot be expected to behave like other categories of leaders. The wheeler-dealer is a master of political power-play who owes loyalty first to his sponsors and godfathers, and then the party that served as his vehicle. The people or the general public whose votes purportedly brought him into power would not count much as stakeholders.
Like the clever footballer called Maradona, the wheeler-dealer politician uses members of one group of his support base against other stakeholders as situations may suit his intrigues and calculations. Not being a professional administrator or manager of human resources, the wheeler-dealer politician usually delegates functions to his loyalists. But he also engages some “private eyes and ears” to monitor those he had assigned functions to and report back to him in confidence.
The wheeler-dealer politician is usually quite charismatic and easy-going on the surface, but deep inside, he rarely trusts anyone. He may love to be flattered and praised, but he is also uneasy about letting anybody know exactly what he is up to at any moment. He may be generous but he is calculating enough to ensure that he invests where his generosity would yield maximum results and dividends. Call it exploitation of the weaknesses in other people, but that is the strongest playing card of the wheeler-dealer. He smiles at you when he identifies and recognises one weak point in you, which he can exploit when it suits him to do so.
Divide-and-rule is an old and well-known strategy employed in political management, but what is not commonly known by those upon whom this strategy is practiced is that, it can come with gifts and promises. Call it “Greek-gift” if you like, but wheeler-dealer politicians know that there is no free meal; if you are not paying for the meal, someone else pays! A gift or meal from a wheeler-dealer can be quite foreboding when it comes with a smile, whether the smile comes from the PR man or a crocodile!
It should not be regarded as an idle talk that politics as practiced in developing countries is a business that demands huge investments and with an expectant huge returns. While a few nice and patriotic people go into politics with genuine intention to serve the people, a larger number of politicians have personal agenda and parochial interests. It is this second group of politicians that are referred to here as wheeler-dealers, whose stock-in-trade it is to cause as much confusions as they can, as a means of diverting attention of the masses from their clandestine activities.
Nigerians owe themselves a duty to know the wheeler-dealer category of politicians and their antics so they do not continue to deceive, confuse and enslave the masses. It is usually towards the end of their tenure in power that the wheeler-dealers sow the seeds of confusion so that subsequent administration would have mountains of issues to contend with as a diversionary strategy to keep attention away from the confusions left behind. Call it voodoo system of management!
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
