Opinion
The Growing Alarm
The horrifying effects
of the dreaded viral disease, Ebola fever, dawned heavily on Nigerians on July 25 when a man, who took ill during a flight from Liberia to Nigeria, passed on at a private medical facility in Lagos.
The victim, Patrick Sawyer, a Liberian, was Nigeria’s first Ebola fever case. His death in Lagos expectedly disseminated shock waves around the country, particularly because of Nigeria’s ill-preparedness for the treatment of the disease and the strike action by medical doctors in the country which has led to the shutdown of the nation’s public hospitals.
Ebola disease is a frightening ailment. Its outbreak in Democratic Republic of Congo in 2007 claimed over 2000 lives. This ailment is characterised by profuse bleeding from all body orifices including the eye, nose and rectum. It has exacted a huge toll in some West African countries. At the last count, it was reported that about 700 persons had died after contracting the fever in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea.
Since the confirmation of the death of the Ebola virus victim in Nigeria, the Federal and Lagos State Governments have been taking preventive measures to curb the spread of the infection in line with World Health Organisation, WHO, guidelines.
These include the decontamination of the hospital where he died, the cremation of the deceased person and the isolation of 59 medical and airport personnel who had contacts with him. It is reassuring that those steps were taken. This is because the disease, also known as Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever, has no known cure.
However, the question on the lips of many Nigerians is: how did the victim enter the country without being screened? Where were the health officials at the border? This carelessness has exposed the underbelly of our screening processes for persons entering the country. It is expedient at this point that the government orders better surveillance by health authorities at our borders.
These officials must be properly trained and equipped to screen passengers who are suspected to be suffering from this lethal virus and other grave ailments that could endanger public health in the country. The Ebola virus is indeed a veritable danger to Nigeria and the world because of the ease with which it spreads and the swiftness with which it kills.
Therefore it is time our health authorities designed a viable response mechanism that will involve keeping infected persons out of the country and educate Nigerians on the possible sources of infection such as the consumption of infected bush meat and contacts with the saliva and body fluids of victims etc.
There is need for public education on the symptoms, which begin with headache, fever and sore throat and quickly progress to diarrhea, vomiting, body pains and bleeding from all body outlets. In view of this, every citizen has to be trained on what to do in suspected cases in order to stem possible spread. Also, Nigerians should be encouraged to observe personal hygiene.
Ebola is a medical emergency; that is why it is important to do everything to halt it in its tracks before it overwhelms us. The world has suffered a lot of epidemics such as bird and swine flu that claimed so many lives between 2005 and 2009. All hands must be on deck to avoid a repeat, and health authorities at all levels of government in the country must cooperate on this effort to avert a total Ebola virus epidemic.
There is a growing alarm over the Ebola virus globally, but our response has to be one of vigilance to prevent its spread in the country, not fear or panic. There is also a need for proper information management on the disease to avert panic, hysteria and possible stigmatisation of suspected cases, including unsubstantiated suggestions about the prevention, treatment, cure and spread of the virus. I don’t find anything wrong with seeking international help on the handling of this situation where it is needed.
In all, I urge scientists all over the world to expedite action on vaccines and a cure for this virus. The virus is a blight on West Africa that must be promptly contained. It is natural to worry, but I am optimistic that if the foregoing suggested measures are adopted by the authorities, the virus will be eliminated.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics1 day ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News1 day agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
