Editorial
2015: Checking Excessive Spending
The issue of spending at electioneering has
always been a challenge even in the advanced democracies. This is more so because when the electoral process is excessively monetised, not only would the ordinary man not be able to vote according to his conscience, but the entire system would be endangered.
All over the advanced democracies, great care is taken to regulate where donations to parties can come from, how much can be allowed from a single donor and how it is spent. Not only are there legislations backing them the authorities take time to monitor the process.
Interestingly, Nigeria also has aspects of this legislation under the Electoral Act, but even when its enforcement has been a problem, some politicians are kicking against the ceiling on electoral spending. Sadly, even President Goodluck Jonathan says the sum allowed is too inadequate.
According to the Electoral Act, a presidential candidate can only spend a maximum of N1 billion naira, while a governorship candidate is to spend N200 million, a Senate candidate to spend N40m and a House of Representatives candidate should not spend more than N20 million.
Similarly, those aspiring for the State Houses of Assembly are allowed to spend N10 million, Local Government Chairman is to spend N10 million, while councillors are to spend N1 million. Of course, there are also sanctions for contravening the law ranging from fines to jail terms.
While these provisions have been flouted severally by nearly all the parties, even at the elections held recently, there is no record of any party or politician that has been sanctioned. But why the issue had to come up at the current review of the Electoral Act is what the average Nigerian will need to know.
Perhaps, it should be put on record again that one of the reasons advanced for the advocacy for a one tenure term for the office of the President and State Governor was the scandalous cost of running elections every four years. To turn around to say that the ceiling stipulated by the Electoral Act was too small is capable of confusing the polity.
The truth of the matter is that elections are too expensive in Nigeria and should be condemned. The situation clearly rules out persons who may be very equipped with character, fear of God and zeal to serve because they cannot afford the millions required. This, on its own, promotes the political godfather syndrome that had become the bane of governance of the country.
Often, the ones that can afford such sums are political business-men who invest any sum and get into office and take back their money with a self determined interest from the public purse. Till date, nobody has been able to convince such political jobbers that what they are doing amounts to corruption, criminality and betrayal of public trust.
Clearly, if the system makes it look like the offices are for sale, not much can change for this country. Incidentally, the emphasis on money begins from the political parties that sell candidates form to as many persons as possible at such outrageous sums. Then the electorates openly demand to be paid to vote with the mindset that the candidate would go into office and steal any way.
The Tide thinks that it is high time the situation changed. According to a writer, it is only a mentally retarded fellow that would continue to do something the same way every time and expect different result. Nigerians must stop the emphasis on money in all spheres of our national life.
In the first place we cannot understand why Nigeria should continue to give electoral grants to political parties who have so much money to spend. It is no longer secret that Nigeria has about 60 registered political parties because of the huge sums paid to them every election year. Meanwhile, only four parties are visible, while the rest fail to grab even a councillorship seat across the country.
We think that because too much money is brought to the scene, the old and time valued political campaigns are lost. Instead, what we have is a do or die approach that results in the arming of jobless youths to kill fellow Nigerians over political offices that are here today and gone tomorrow. Of course, the reason is that “I cannot spend all that money and fail.”
That is why the National Assembly must put the interest of the nation first as they review the Electoral Act. They must stop grants to parties and bring down the number of parties, reduce the ceiling on spending and insist on empowering INEC to sanction any and all defaulters.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
