Opinion
Much Ado About 2015
It mocks us as much as it excites us. Like an elixir, it stirs us into action from our state of ennui. As we gravitate towards it, it evokes our emotion, curiosity and even suspicion so much that every move or action is calculated and wrapped up around it. And for its sake, governance which is the main essence of politics is now becoming a weary priority, with education, power supply, infrastructure and other high flyovers in the needs of the Nigerian people now suffering miserable neglect .
It is also the ultimate decider as many have predicted. Its verdict can either unite or fragment us. 2015 is such on elixir, an enigma.
Even if we feign ignorance of how 2015 will look like, we can not ignore the concatenation of events in the last few months and the deafening razzmatazz that come with them. From the internal fissures that are tearing the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) apart to the brouhaha of the opposition parties which recently coalesced into a mega, impregnable fortress called All Progressive Congress (APC); and from the vicious threat thrown up by the acronym hullaballoo, courtesy of the proxy APCs – either African Peoples Congress or All Patriotic Citizens, to Diepreye Alamieyeseigha’s controversial pardon. We can scratch from these as many headlines as events unfold.
In all of these however, one thing is central. And that is the 2015 battle, with the grandeur, splendour and cushy comforts of the Presidency as the ultimate target.
But the ruling party is making no pretensions that it is not ready to let go the Presidency, at least not in 2015. The anointing of “Mr Fixer”, as Chief Tony Anenih is now popularly called, as the chairman of the PDP Board of Trustees; the balkanization of the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) with the overnight formation of the PDP Governors Forum and the imposition of Akwa Ibom State governor, Godswill Akpabio as its chairman and the on-going peace talks in the PDP are palatable icing on Jonathan’s presidential cake, as well as clear signposts of ‘no vacancy’ in Aso Rock in 2015.
While Akpabio has threatened to flush out the ‘Judases’ that may want to stand in Jonathan’s way, come 2015, the PDP National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur has assured the President that he can now go to sleep with his two eyes closed and even enjoy his siesta if he likes. These propositions, though epitomise political naivety and as well expose the dirty underbelly of Nigeria’s power elite and their antediluvian mindset, they are, in fact, a well known political sophistry meant to dissuade political adversaries within and outside the PDP from eyeing Jonathan’s seat.
While the ruling party continues to poison the political clime with hubris arrogance, the opposition, on the other hand, is busy punching the air with a broom of hurricane. Without any sense of history and a gobbet of political finesse, both parties are approaching the 2015 elections with raw savagery unbefitting of 21st century Nigeria.
Given the political antecedents of ruling parties in Nigeria and the recent developments within the PDP, especially as we recently witnessed in the choice of the party’s Board of Trustees Chairman and the detonation (or is it diffusion) of the power of the NGF, there is no doubt that the PDP would want to wield the full and imperial powers of the Presidency to crush any perceived opposition on its path. On the other hand, I have the suspicion that the opposition mega party, APC, would want to go beyond civilised, legal means to resist imperialist fascism, going by its recent unsavoury pronouncements that what happens in the Middle East would be a child’s play if the PDP tries to foist itself on the country. This fear is even made more potent by Nigeria’s gradual collapse into a two-party system.
In truth, nobody can take away the fact that both the PDP and APC, if the latter finally comes on full stream, are tough cookies that cannot be easily crumbled on the template of personality and followership. While the PDP boasts of 23 states, the APC parades 11. This development has particularly worn 2015 the garb of a delicate delicacy that must be handled and treated with utmost care.
We should remember that we have travelled this path before during the First and Second Republics when our political elite wheeled the two republics to ruin, chaos and bloody disaster. We can do without the sure farce of a possible third if we all play the game by the rules.
Boye Salau
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News11 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News11 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Niger Delta11 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers9 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education10 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education10 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
