Opinion
Corruption As Phenomenon
Prior to now, some people had thought that the most dreaded Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) was the only ailment mankind had ever known to be incurable. But it is apparent now that AIDS has a companion in corruption that has become a phenomenon.
Corruption depreciates the value of life globally. The thinking before now was that corruption affected only Third World countries. Truly, it is prevalent in those countries. But it takes root in advanced countries as well. For instance, the United States of America (USA) has had its fair share of corruption scandals that had rocked its greatness.
When hurricane Katrina struck some years ago, the abysmal performance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency responsible for the provision of relief to the natural disaster victims was a shock many could not come to terms with. It was later discovered that those who were put in charge of the relief operations were inept political cronies of the leaders. This is one example among many.
It is the responsibility of every government to provide services and infrastructure to deal with situations of natural disasters or calamities. But government’s responsibility does not end with the provision of the said facilities. Thus a government has the power to police or monitor the way these facilities are used to achieve desired end.
Though sometimes this is not always the case particularly in situations where it is not accountable to the people it serves. The truth is that a government that is responsive to its people will ensure that responsibilities assigned are executed.
This is the case with Nigeria’s election, referred to as repository of corruption. Many government officials or politicians compromise financial probity in order to prosecute their electioneering campaigns. Some trade favours for cash needed to win election and they end up using the cash to purchase votes.
The fight against corruption, especially electoral corruption, can be contained in this country if our electoral body, INEC, will ensure transparency in our electoral process. The press and religions organisations could add to the fight against this monster by forming a bulwark against despotism upon which corruption has often thrived.
Another way to fight corruption is to provide sound education for all. Certainly, poor and illiterate persons are highly vulnerable to manipulation by those who are economically well-off or those who hold political power.
There is a sense in which a people could be said to control their government through their wishes and aspirations. But when poverty and illiteracy characterise such persons, the government demonstrates a high propensity to despotism.
Governments become despotic because the people lack the means to keep the government in check. This results in a circle where poverty causes bad governance and bad governance causes poverty.
Transparency International, an organization devoted to the fight against corruption and the strengthening of civil society groups has provided the measure to ascertain the quality of governance in over 150 nations. Such measure highlights the extent of corruption perpetrated in countries. The periodic corruption index released by the body has always shown that the poorer a nation the lower the ranking.
Further analysis reveals interesting patterns. It has been acknowledged that countries in sub-Sahara Africa are less corrupt than their counterparts on the same level in other parts of the world.
The reason corruption is low in some poor countries is because they protect civil rights groups. If President Goodluck Jonathan must succeed in the fight against corruption, he must go beyond employing the EFCC to prosecute the fight, and guarantee greater freedom to civil rights organisations and the press.
When people have the freedom to speak and assemble, society benefits by increasing the range of ideas and keeping corruption in check. This is why corrupt regimes always clamp down on the press.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
