Opinion
Igburu Clan: A Weeping Child
Igburu clan, situated at North East axis of Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area (aka ONELGA) by the bank of sombreiro river in Orashi region of the Niger Delta. The Ibe clan comprises twelve (12) autonomous communities.
Before the civil war in Nigeria between 1967 through 1970, Igburu clan was like a sheep without shepherd until soon after the civil war when it was deemed necessary to create Eze-Igburu Stool and the incumbent was his blessed memory late Chief S.O. Ogwe, who hails from Obigwe community as the then headquarters of Ali-Ogba, where the founding fathers of Ogbaland first settled before exploration and establishment of other places of abode, which constitutes what is known today, as Ogba Kingdom.
Since 1971 when the Eze Igburu was created, Chief Ogwe was the ‘Eze Igburu of Igburu’ clan until he felt victim to the cold hands of death on April, 2002 after over thirty (30) years on the stool. Of course, Igburu clan mourned for the departed monarch for over 12 calendar months.
However, to fill the vacuum already created, a new course was chanted by Igburu citizens at the autumn of 2004. Searching for the incumbent was politically inclined and contestable.
After normal electoral processes, two personalities emerged from Amah community of Igburu clan in ONELGA. Precisely, on December 18, 2005 election to the Eze Igburu Stool was duly conducted at Omoku, headquarters of Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Council between Chief Sunny A. Eleba and Chief Innocent A. Ugada respectively. In fact, the battle was likened to a drama of two giants.
Normally, according to the tenents of election in a democratic system, a winner would emerge. In this circumstance Chief Sunny Eleba emerged and mounted the throne of Eze Igburu as determined by the electorate and designated Eze Igburu 11 after publication of results.
Traditionally, the official coronation was performed at Obigwe, the ancestral headquarters of Igburu clan on February 18, 2006 by the most elderly of Igburu clan vicinity in the person of late Elder (Okniye) Nwobite of Elieta community in the presence of Igburu representatives from the 12 autonomous communities.
Pertinently, the newly installed Eze Igburu lived to pilot Igburu affairs but for a short while. HRH, Eze S.A. Eleba joined his predecessors to the great beyond on Wednesday eve, June 10, 2009 after a protracted illness at the St. Patrick Hospital in Port Harcourt. The demise of the Eze Igburu has plunged Igburu clan into mourning and has equally created another vacuum which may be technically difficult to fill.
Controversially, not too long after the installation of the late Eze Igburu 11, his contemporary at the conducted election of December 18, 2005 was equally installed as Eze-Ali Igburu of same Igburu clan in the Palance of Oba of Ogbaland at Omoku, which was publicly pronounced on December 14, 2007. This was astonishing to well reasoning citizens of the area. Nevertheless, the contradiction created is that the installed Eze-Ali Igburu also hails from Amah community, and was well supported by same Igburu citizens.
In ‘Things fall Apart’ Prof. Chinua Achebe observed that the people of Umuofia could no longer act as one because the Whiteman has set confusion in their midst and things began to fall apart as the centre could not hold firm. This is the true nature of Igburu clan for installation of multiple leaders created by ignorance, socio-economic and political instability.
At this juncture, it behooves one to pose whether Igburu is weeping for its departed monarchs or weeping for inconsistency in leadership nomenclature and dichotomy in a Kingdom or Ethnic Nationalities that has existed as an entity for centuries? If the latter is the focus, then there is urgent need for appropriate and adequate reorientation and education in the light of this thought provoking issue at stake. In the present dispensation, Igburu clan is in a fist soliciting for enhancing solution.
Without mincing words, it has been asserted philosophically that ‘twenty lumps of yam is too much for a pepper soup’. Igburu clan cannot be tossed here and there because of egocentricism and malice to the detriment of the populace.
Conclusively, one wish to beckon the Rivers State Government and particularly the Ministry in Charge of Local Government and chieftaincy Affairs, the Council of traditional rulers to expedite action and set a machinery in motion to streamline these ugly issues ravaging Igburu clan particularly and Ogba Kingdom in general. How long shall Igburu continue to weep for injustices and who will bail the cat from the socio-economic, political and cultural dungeon!
G.N. Ominyanwa, Public Affairs Analyst, resides in Port Harcourt..
G.N. Ominyanwa
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
