Opinion
Rivers Needs Potable Water
One of the major responsibilities of every government is to take measures that would promote the well-being of its citizens. In doing this, government has to regularly seek ways and means of improving its performance so as to ensure that its actions are commensurable with the desires and need of its people. No society is static; human societies are dynamic. Therefore, government has to match this dynamism through conscious efforts aimed at moving the society forward. And it is when government fails to perform this obligation that the people would be forced to complain.
A key area where government has always given much attention is the health sector, obviously because good health is a critical factor in the life of every human being. Good health promotes longevity, while poor health is one of the reasons for low life expectancy. Hence, the top priority accorded the health sector by the Rivers State Government cannot be said to be misplaced.
The State in the past one year, has dotted the landscape of Rivers State with over 150 health centre projects, to bring health care delivery services closer to the masses. Other aspects of health care delivery are also receiving government’s attention. And based on available evidence, it is projected that soon, Rivers people would have no need to travel abroad for specialist health care attention.
However, provision of potable water is another key area of ensuring good health of the citizenry. In Rivers State, there is no scarcity of water. The State is blessed with streams and rivers, and we do not have to dig too far to find water.
But a question that quickly comes to mind is: Is water from these sources safe for drinking, especially when not boiled.? A confident answer lies in no, as water from streams and rivers get easily polluted with dirts, as well as human and animal wastes. It is even more dangerous in an oil producing state like Rivers that flows with petroleum products.
Another issue that should be of serious concern to those who cherish good health is the location of boreholes. Many boreholes are located too close to septic tanks. The cleaning of many over-head water tanks is even carried out in an unhygienic manner as cleaners casually strip themselves naked to do the cleaning.
Unfortunately, water is sold to the public from these tanks. It would not therefore be incorrect to say that as people pay for water from these tanks, they are equally paying for diseases.
Meanwhile, rain water to many people appears to be a source of good drinking water, but certainly not in a State like Rivers where gas flaring releases dangerous substances into the atmosphere. It is against this backdrop that I call on the Rivers State Government to reinforce and sustain its good health programme for the citizenry with the provision of portable water.
Already, the State government is said to have signed an Understanding (MoU) with a consortium of three firms for the design of water project for Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor. This is surely a large scale project. But smaller water projects could also be designed for our rural communities, where most of the people do not have access to safe drinking water. Some communities are lucky to have mono-pumps, but they have to contend with the problem of maintaining them. Today, there are many broken-down mono-pumps in most communities. Therefore, a system of maintenance of broken-down mono-pumps should be put in place by government, especially by the local governments in the state.
As we give further consideration to the issue of portable water for the people of Rivers State, we should look at what science tells us about good drinking water. It says that 75% of our body weight consist of water, and that we could live for only a few days without water. It must also be stated that as hunger stimulates the need for man to eat food, so does thirst cause man to want to drink. The thirst for water could be very strong, but not every water that appeals to the human eye is suitable for drinking.
Pure water which is a compound of hydrogen and oxygen is colourless, tasteless, and has no smell and should be free of any kind of contamination. This is the kind of water the people of Rivers State deserves from government. And I strongly believe the Amaechi-led government is up to the task.
Kikpoye-Jonathan is of the Rivers State Ministry of Information.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
