Editorial
IYC: Avoiding Another Crisis
Current developments within the
Ijaw Youth Council suggest the
emergence of a new faction. On October 10, 2014, at what it called “an emergency general congress”, the suspension of the President of the body, Comrade Udengs Eradiri was announced.
While announcing the suspension and appointment of IYC Mobilisation Officer, Wisdom Ikuli as Acting President, the faction said that the action was in response to Eradiri’s alleged “fraudulent activities and other actions detrimental to the growth of the council and the Ijaw nation”.
The faction, made up of “suspended” zonal chairmen, also accused Eradiri of “organising a summit of the council without consulting other members of the executive, fighting against the emergence of Ijaw president as well as the emergence of an Ijaw governor in Rivers State, among others.”
This action, followed a well-planned and publicised summit of the body, held at the Petroleum Training Institute’s Conference Centre, Effurun, near Warri, Delta State, with the active participation of all nine out of 10 zonal executive officers in the eastern, western and central zones, as well as woman leader, and all clan chairmen.
While announcing the suspension of Ikuli and the zonal chairmen earlier, the national executive council had also accused them of involvement in fraudulent activities, indiscipline, insubordination, and various actions capable of undermining the integrity and image of the IYC.
Given that a well-attended congress just rose from its national summit in Warri in one accord aimed at charting a progressive future for the entire IYC, we see the absence of the Ikuli-led faction at the summit, which he actively participated in planning, and the allegations against Eradiri, as suspect and a calculated attempt at causing avoidable conflict.
While we agree that it is normal for people to disagree, inciting the youth against themselves is wicked and condemnable. If the split is politically motivated, everything should be done to resolve it quickly. Politics should help the course of the people and not destroy.
This is why The Tide thinks that the emerging struggle for the leadership of IYC at this time in the nation’s history, whether politically-motivated or not, is unfortunate and unacceptable. Indeed, all well-meaning and patriotic Ijaw sons and daughters should rise up and nip-in-the bud this ugly situation.
We expect that the parent body – the Ijaw National Congress (INC), royal fathers, elders and the elite as well as the various governments of the States that make up the Ijaw nation, should urgently intervene, and ensure that the current noise within the IYC did not development into something else.
We say this because issues affecting youths are often very delicate. Clearly the failure to deal with it will pose enormous challenge to the smooth and peaceful conduct of the 2015 general elections in the Niger Delta region and beyond.
Even so, we expect that all the principal players in the IYC drama will sheathe their swords and show exemplary leadership qualities. They need to prove that they are a better alternative to the current crop of leaders. The IYC must join other youth bodies to ensure that politicians do not mortgage the future of Nigerian again. They must insist and begin to show to all the future they want to see.
Finally, we think that politics is intended for the good of the citizenry. We think also that those who go into politics are patriotic and interested in the safety and welfare of the people. It will be most unfortunate if politics gives a different impression in this age, even to reduce everything to politics is very sad.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics2 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
