Politics
In Defence Of Democracy
The return of democracy in Nigeria after the ouster of President Shehu Shagari’s government on December 31, 1983 through a military coup was a torturous journey. Members of civil society groups, the press and political class suffered terribly for the military to relinguish power to a democratically elected government on May 29, 1999.
It took the neo-nationalists 16 years, 4 months and 29 days to win the battle for democratic rule in Nigeria. It was indeed a painful victory as the soldiers that bestrode the Nigerian political space for so long a time were adamant to cede power to civilians in view of the comfort and stupendous wealth that charaterised governance in the oil-rich nation.
Consequently, the neo-nationalists were harassed, brutalized, hauled into prison without trial, maimed and forced into exile. Some even paid the supreme price to propitiate and pacify their persecutors.
Regrettably, majority of those who fought and won the battle for the return of democracy in Nigeria are not politicians. So, one can appreciate their anger and disgust when some rascals and hoodlums who masquerade as politicians have decided to unwittingly plunge the country into crisis to derail the nation’s democracy.
It is against this backdrop that the Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka and other well-meaning Nigerians have continued to react over the political crisis in Rivers State which has the propensity of being replicated in other parts of the country. For Prof. Soyinka, he has a major stake in the sustenance of the nation’s democracy. From 1960s to date, the erudite Professor has been in the fore-front of the campaign for good governance and democratic rule. Expectedly, he was one of the those who commented on the political imbroglio in Rivers State. Hear him:
“What I want to do here is to remind you of a certain historic figure. I am sure most of us here must be familiar with Thomas Becket, who was Archbishop of Canterbury in the 11th Century, who was murdered at the altar by four knights of King Henry 11.
“Now, I have read on the pages of newspapers and watched on television that the president’s spokesmen have been trying to distance him (President) from what is happening in Rivers State. They are doing their job and I wish them well, but they have to understand the perception out there in the world, is that he bears a lot of responsibility in Rivers State.
“Again, I have been asking myself: are we not tilting towards absolute monarchy? There are many ways of saying, will no one rid me of this pestilence in Rivers State. You don’t have to utter a word directly but from your conduct which can convey very strong signals or better still, say I will come after you.
“I am not casting aspersions on any individual, but I am saying that one can establish certain conducts in the minds of one’s followers, all of which circle around impunity.
“There are certain way you can convince your followers, your officials and your cohorts that they can act with impunity. There are many ways, for instance you can expose a prey and say that prey is available.
“Let us go back to that historical story about 11 centuries ago, I want to imagine King Henry saying, find some way of making the Archbishop’s carriage unserviceable or the carriage-maker makes the carriage grounded. Even after the King’s counsel said this is unfair and that the Archbishop’s carriage should be released. I hope you see the parallelism where the governor’s plane, under dubious circumstances has been grounded, for I don’t know how many weeks now.
“And so, they pretend, nobody has spoken, nobody said anything on how one of your Barons and Dukes can function without a carriage. Now that kind of indifference can create an enabling ground for your followers or officials to take further actions, which can endanger that Baron or Duke. I am using this parallelism so that we can understand that something strange is going on.
“It is unfortunate that a mere domestic appendage of power could go to a state and take over the state for 11 days.
“A queen goes to the Archbishop’s domain, stays 11 days, and the Baron is not even allowed to move. Creating an enabling environment for the Baron to be dealt with. He is stopped by a sheriff and that baron is responsible for security and governance.
“I am calling on the President, please curb the excesses of your wife. Too much is too much. Is she the first First lady we have had? She is now being used to abuse the authority of an elected governor. The Governor’s Lodge was teargased. Anybody who said teargas was not thrown into Amaechi’s lodge is either ignorant or lying. Some of Amaechi’s security have been removed. The domestic grounds are being eroded. With a teargas thrown, the next one may be a smoke gun.”
Lagos-based Lawyer and human rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN) commented thus: “It is regrettable that exactly 10 years after a group of thugs attempted to abduct a sitting governor in Anambra State, another set of thugs attempted to undermine democratic institutions in Rivers.
“The President’s silence on the unfortunate development in the state is tantamount to an endorsement of the political crisis.
“We have been through this route before. We must tell them that we are not conquered people. The case of Rivers State is more absurd, more odious, where five members of the Assembly aided by the state invaded the Assembly chambers and chased away their colleagues. The silence of the President is an endorsement of the crisis. Let no one fool Nigerians, we know where this is coming from.”
Senate president, David Mark also commented this way: “Clearly what is happening in Rivers State is an embarrassment to legislators across the length and breadth of the country.
“It is in the interest of the State House of Assembly not to do anything that will portray legislators as irresponsible, because that is not what we are.
“Clearly also, what is happening is totally unacceptable and it must be condemned in its strongest possible term in its entirety irrespective of who is directly involved or who is behind it.
“It is not a situation that we expect and we would not want it to continue beyond this point where it has reached.
“Because of the urgency, I also believe that this Senate must take urgent step to protect democracy and protect this country and to ensure that democracy continues to grow and improve in the country”.
The political crisis in Rivers State has indeed drawn the ire of the general public. It is unpatriotic for anybody to castigate Prof. Wole Soyinka or any other Nigerian for condemning the impunity that is being displayed by some political gladiators in Rivers State.
It is not just about Amaechi, it is in defence of the fragile democracy that was bequeathed to Nigerians after a protracted battle with the military. Please be guided.
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
Politics
Parties’ Deregistration: How Justice Lifu Overruled Appeal Court Justices
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday brushed aside the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which ordered him to stay proceedings in a suit that sought deregistration of the African Democratic Party (ADC), Accord Party and three others.
The Court of Appeal in a unanimous decision of a panel of three Justices had on May 22, 2026 directed the Federal High Court Judge not to proceed with the suit until an appeal pending before them and filed by Accord Party is resolved.
In a Certified True Copy Enrol Order of the Superior Court, Justices Mohammed Danjuma, Adebukola Banjoko and Oyejoju Oyewumi asked the lower Court Judge to stay proceedings until all issues on the appeal filed by the Accord Party were resolved
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State had, through the Accord Party, applied to justice Lifu to join him as a defendant in the deregistration legal battle instituted by a group of former legislators.
The contention of the Osun State governor was that he had a stake in the Accord Party, being the platform he was seeking re-election in the August 15 gubernatorial poll in the state.
In his ruling, Justice Lifu on April 27 ruled against the Osun State governor, rejecting his request to be joined in the suit to defend his own position and interest.
Not satisfied with the Federal High Court decision, the Osun State governor, through his lawyer, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), moved to the Court of Appeal in Abuja where he challenged the Justice Lifu decision to refuse to allow him join the suit.
After listening to the argument canvassed, especially that he has interest to protect as Accord Party gubernatorial candidate for Osun State governorship election, the three Justices of the Court of Appeal, unanimously directed Justice Lifu to allow them look into the grievances of the governor.
In specific terms, the Court of Appeal Justices directed Justice Lifu not to proceed further with the matter and fixed October 27 to determine the interlocutory appeal of the appellant.
However, when the certified enroll order and notice of appeal were served on Justice Peter Lifu by Mr Adetunbi (SAN), the judge rejected it on the ground that it was a ploy to arrest his judgment in the matter.
Although the judge had adjourned his judgment delivery in the matter indefinitely, he finally made a dramatic turn around on Monday and proceeded to deliver the judgment that has now proscribed the five political parties.
-
Rivers3 days ago
Rivers Police Uncovers Firearm Concealed In Loaf Of Bread
-
Niger Delta3 days agoPro-Chancellor Hands Over Okey Onuchuku Peace, Conflict Institute Building
-
Sports3 days ago
Six Nigerians To Play For NBA Teams
-
Business3 days agoIPMAN Raises Concern Over Delay In Chinese Refinery Deal …Predicts Lower Fuel Prices Through Competition
-
News3 days agoFubara Reaffirms Commitment To Blue Economy, Private Sector Growth …Calls For Protection Of Marine Resources
-
Business3 days ago
Gas Economy: Decade of Gas, Pi-CNG/ EV Deepen Media Engagement
-
Politics3 days agoSenate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
-
Business3 days ago
Navy Hands Over Five Suspected Stowaways to NIS
