Editorial
Jonathan And That NDDC Probe Report
President Goodluck Jonathan, last week said he would eradicate corruption, ensure probity and accountability in the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) when he received the report on activities of the commission in Abuja. Jonathan’s position was informed by the startling revelations from the Presidential Monitoring Committee’s report on NDDC.
The report indicted officials of the commission for indulging in unjustifiable variation of contract sums, abandonment of projects and other sharp practices. It said that between 2005 and 2011 NDDC engaged incompetent contractors, approved and executed projects outside its statutory scope in Cross River, Edo and Rivers States.
In addition to the reports from the three states, feedback on 1,510 projects compiled in six other oil producing states by the committee depicts an even more dreadful can of worms. The Tide can now recall the systemic decay in NDDC that made the commission a shame of the region. Owing to persistent crises and corruption, President Jonathan said he would reform the commission to generate people-oriented projects
It is indeed sad that rather than count their blessings, twelve years after the inception the NDDC, oil producing states have recorded more economic and environmental woes. From one internal conflict to the other, the NDDC itself, had become a looting centre where principal officers, tear themselves up. Indeed their passion for self-service far outweighed the organisation’s interest.
Unfortunately, officials of the commission portray the commission as a mere contract awarding agency. It is for this disconnect from the original dream that abuses happened and then the Presidential Committee under the leadership of Mr Steve Orosanya was formed to audit contract awards, among other things.
At the end of its exercise, the former head of the commission, Mr Chibuzor Ugwuoha was sacked. Incidentally, the Presidential Committee led by Chief Isaac Jemide merely justified Orosanya’s report.
Even so, it beats our imagination that officials of the commission could be so callous. We remember the former boss of the commission, Ambassador Samuel Edem who was alleged to have spent N1 billion on witchcraft and N270 million on rituals to remain in office.
While we salute the courage of the panels for being able to unearth the rot in the commission we urge the present leadership to ensure probity and accountability as well as position the commission for quality service to the people of the Niger Delta. On the other hand, the Federal Government must implement recommendations of the panel if any progress is to be recorded. Indicted officials should be prosecuted to serve as deterrent to others, even as past leaders of the commission should not be spared.
But we are worried that some officials under the present regime refused access to some information needed by the committee. This not only amounts to presenting oneself as an accomplice but also suggests that the officer would do more and this is unacceptable.
A situation where principal officers brazenly violate the Act establishing the commission should not be tolerated any longer, especially in contract awards. Indeed the Federal Government should seize this opportunity to reposition and redirect the NDDC to face functions as an interventionist agency for the Niger Delta people and not to compete with State and local governments in catering for people already being taken care of in the cities.
We expect that those areas that the panel was denied access would also be called up with a view to uncovering more abuses in the system. The Federal Government must be seen to be committed to transforming the NDDC with a view to making it directly impact on the long neglected people of the Niger Delta.
Clearly, the NDDC may have failed the nation and the region in particular, but to fail to implement the probe report is to legitimise corruption, impunity and acts of lawlessness in the commission.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
