Connect with us

Politics

Crisis In PHALGA: Who Is Right?

Published

on

Democracy is an egalitarian form of government in which  citizens of a nation determine  public policy, the laws and the actions of their state, requiring that all citizens have equal opportunity to express their opinion.

The most common system  deemed  “democratic” in modern world is parliamentary system of government in which the voting public take part in elections and choose politicians to represent them. Such representatives take decisions on behalf of those they represent at whatever level, such as int he legislative arm of government.

The term “democracy”, comes from the Greek word, onjuokaria (demokratia), meaning “rule of the people,” which was coined from orjuo (demos) meaning “people,” and kpator (kratos) meaning “power in the middle of the 5th-4th century BC, to denote the political systems that existed in some Greek states, notably Athens, following a popular uprising in 508BC.

Elements considered essential to democracy include freedom of political expression, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, so that citizens are adequately informed and able to vote according to their own best interests, as they see them.

Democracy is often used as shorthand for liberal democracy, which may include elements such as political pluralism, equality before the law,the right to petition elected officials for redress of grievances, due process, civil liberties, human rights and elements, civil society outside the government.

Nigeria operates the presidential system of government and have three tiers of government: the Federal, States and the Local Governments. The composition of the Local Governments Areas was to create and ensure development in these parts of the country.

It is on this ground that the idea of separation of powers, checks and balances came to be. Separation of power is a doctrine which provides a separate authority that makes it possible for the authority to check others.

The implication is that the functions of the three arms of government should be carried out by separate bodies of the people. so that each could act as a check against the other to avoid the concentration of power in the hands of a few.

The doctrine is associated with French philosopher, Montesquieu, and the clearest example of this is found in the American Constitution where the legislative power of the federation is vested in a Congress, the executive power is vested in the president and judicial power in the supreme court

This  system was designed  to ensure that the two arms of government have different functions, while the executive have the sole authority and responsibility for the daily administration of the state or local government, as the case may be. the legislature is the arm of government that makes laws.

The executives also have the power to enforce laws made by the legislature.

The legislature therefore is a kind of deliberative assembly with the power to pass, amend and repeal laws. It has an exclusive authority to raise and adopt the budget and other money bills.

With the foregoing in view, the crisis in the port Harcourt City council in Rivers State, where the executive and legislative assembly have been at logger-head for over one month  is something to be worried about.

Many have said the essenced of electing those at the head of affairs have been defeated following the continued in-house fighting over who leads the legislature.

The two arms have  not  worked together since after the election and inauguration of the two arms last year. Things became worst  when  the Chairman of the local Government, Hon Chimbiko Akarolo returned to the council  after his suspension was lifted in January.

Akarolo was among the 12 local government chairmen  suspended last December by the executive Governor of Rivers State, Rt Hon Chibuike Amaechi. The suspension, according to the Governor, was to ensure that the chairmen live up to their responsibilities by  delivering dividends of democracy to their people.

Many analysts believed that the  Chairmen became lords soon after they were elected into office. They no longer attended meetings to brain storm on how to help the state government develop their areas. These 12 Chairmen became scape goats when a meeting of stakeholders was called in December by Governor Chibuike  Amaechi with only 11 chairmen in attendance.

Their attitudes did not go down well with the Governor, who had stated his determination to ensure that all parts of  the state is developed. He suspended the 12 chairmen and swore in their Deputy two days later to handle the affairs of their local governments with a view to ensuring development.

The story of the Port Harcourt City council started in February when Hon Endurance Elenwo, councilor representing the council in Ward 15, wrote a petition on misappropriation, Gross misconduct, abuse of office and misinformation meted by the house leader, Mr Kingsly Owhonda Amadi of the legislative Assembly.

Mr Elenwo, while moving a motion to impeach Mr Amadi as the leader, noted that members of the legislative assembly were sworn into office on June 3rd and the leader declared the sum of three Million, five hundred naira as house vote whereas, the sum of Four Million was released by the executive chairman.

According to the letter, dated 20th February, Mr Elenwo noted that upon being confronted, Mr Amadi,  admitted but could not explain the whereabout of the remaining five hundred thousand naira.

The letter further noted that in December,2011,the sum of two hundred thousand naira was released for Mock session of the house  to Mr Amadi, the house leader, by the executive chairman and he, Amadi, declared One hundred thousand and also could not account for the remaining One hundred thousand Naira.

These and many other reasons culminated in the impeachment of the leader. It was learnt that 13 councillors, which represents the majority, and  two third voted for the impeachment of Mr Kingsly Owhonda  Amadi as the leader of the Port Harcourt City Legislative Assembly which subsequently elected Bar. Linda Amadi as leader.

It was learnt that the situation did not go down well with the Executive, headed by the Chairman, Hon Chimbiko Akarolo, who insisted that the impeached Leader must be reinstated.

The matter has gone through a long process of settlement from government House, to the State security service,(SSS), Police command as well as the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC).

In each of these, the question raised by the Councilors was “why is the chairman interested in a legislative matter  and a man that was been alleged to have misappropriate funds.”

The story, funny as it may sound, became more worrisome even when the Clerk of the House, who would have protected the house went on to conduct an illegal meeting or sitting by the so-called minority. News have it last week that the Chairman, Hon Chimbiko Akarolo presented his 2012 budget to six councilors  presided over by the impeached leader.

The crisis which took another dimension also believed that the six councilors have approved the budget and the impeached leader went to court after one week of impeachment.

But the new leader, Barrister Linda Amadi, insisted that the Majority councilors are not going back and would fight to the end. She also noted that the Clerk of the House, who witnessed the Impeachment of Mr Amadi and was faulty alongside the Chairman, who has decided to frustrate the legislative assembly

She noted that the majority have written to authorities and recommended punishment for the Clerk while the Assembly may proceed on Impeachment on the chairman.

Many stakeholders in the local government  have questioned  the Chairman on his interest in involving in legislative matters ,instead of concentrating on his administrative and executive work.

The in-house fight between the two arms of the local government  has paralysed  the development of the area. Many believe that the present executive has failed in its efforts to represent the people in all ramifications of governance, noting that after about 10 months, the administration has not embarked on projects that would impart on the people.

Sources say that the continuous in-house fight would force the state government to dissolve the council to allow peace rain.

Having  analysed the scenario, however the question is “who is right and who is wrong?” Majority is often listed as a characteristic of democracy. But it is also possible for a minority to be oppressed by a tyranical majority in the absence of governmental or constitutional protections of individual or group rights. In the case, there is a Government and a constitution.

As the drama of who is at fault continue to unfold without a defined code, those who are authors in the game should also note that Port Harcourt is the capital of Rivers State, the “Treasure base of the nation” and that many are interested in the intrigues, and of the executive and the legislature of the Port Harcourt Local government.

Continue Reading

Politics

Parties’ Deregistration: How Justice Lifu Overruled Appeal Court Justices

Published

on

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday brushed aside the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which ordered him to stay proceedings in a suit that sought deregistration of the African Democratic Party (ADC), Accord Party and three others.
The Court of Appeal in a unanimous decision of a panel of three Justices had on May 22, 2026 directed the Federal High Court Judge not to proceed with the suit until an appeal pending before them and filed by Accord Party is resolved.
In a Certified True Copy Enrol Order of the Superior Court, Justices Mohammed Danjuma, Adebukola Banjoko and Oyejoju Oyewumi asked the lower Court Judge to stay proceedings until all issues on the appeal filed by the Accord Party were resolved
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State had, through the Accord Party, applied to justice Lifu to join him as a defendant in the deregistration legal battle instituted by a group of former legislators.
The contention of the Osun State governor was that he had a stake in the Accord Party, being the platform he was seeking re-election in the August 15 gubernatorial poll in the state.
In his ruling, Justice Lifu on April 27 ruled against the Osun State governor, rejecting his request to be joined in the suit to defend his own position and interest.
Not satisfied with the Federal High Court decision, the Osun State governor, through his lawyer, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), moved to the Court of Appeal in Abuja where he challenged the Justice Lifu decision to refuse to allow him join the suit.
After listening to the argument canvassed, especially that he has interest to protect as Accord Party gubernatorial candidate for Osun State governorship election, the three Justices of the Court of Appeal, unanimously directed Justice Lifu to allow them look into the grievances of the governor.
In specific terms, the Court of Appeal Justices directed Justice Lifu not to proceed further with the matter and fixed October 27 to determine the interlocutory appeal of the appellant.
However, when the certified enroll order and notice of appeal were served on Justice Peter Lifu by Mr Adetunbi (SAN), the judge rejected it on the ground that it was a ploy to arrest his judgment in the matter.
Although the judge had adjourned his judgment delivery in the matter indefinitely, he finally made a dramatic turn around on Monday and proceeded to deliver the judgment that has now proscribed the five political parties.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

ADC: Okonkwo Rejects Amaechi As Presidential Running Mate, Withdraws Support

Published

on

Actor turned politician, Mr Kenneth Okonkwo, has rejected the choice of former Rivers State Governor, Mr Rotimi Amaechi, as the running mate to Alhaji Atiku Abubakar in the 2027 presidential election on the platform of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
In a statement on Monday, Mallam Bolaji Abdulllahi, the National Publicity Secretary of the ADC, announced the party’s choice of Mr Amaechi.
However in a statement, Mr Okonkwo said that the choice of Mr Amaechi from the South South strengthens the continued marginalization of people from the South East.
According to the former spokesperson of the Labour Party, any arrangement that would not factor a person from the South East either as president or vice president in the party is anti-Igbo.
He contended that Chief Raph Nwosu, who founded the ADC in 2005 and willingly surrendered it’s leadership to Senator David Mark did not do so to entrench Igbo marginalization in the party.
The former actor said: “I heard from the social media that ADC has picked its vice presidential candidate from the South-South. If this is true, it is unfortunate, as this will continue the crude marginalisation of the South-East.
“This geo-political zone has neither produced a president or vice president since 1999. To deny the South-East the opportunity to produce the president or vice president in the ADC in 2027, will amount to perpetuating the marginalisation.
“The ADC was founded by Ralphs Nwosu from the South-East in 2005. He made the sacrifice to give up the party in 2025 for the coalition to usher in a better Nigeria. He couldn’t have made that sacrifice to marginalise his own people.
“I did not join the coalition to assist in marginalisation of my own people further. I am of the opinion that if we made a sacrifice to give up the national chairman and the president, it will amount to unpardonable injustice to deny us the vice president in 2027.
“I joined politics to fight for a better Nigeria where no region, geo-political zone, or person will be marginalised.
“The only favour I asked Atiku Abubakar, who openly declared that he is the pathway to the presidency of the South-East, is to show it by choosing someone from the South-East to be his vice.
“If it is confirmed that he has chosen a candidate from the South-South, I wish him well. I am not favourably disposed to campaigning for any presidential ticket that does not have a person of South-East origin as president or vice in 2027”

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Tinubu’s Projects Give APC Edge In South East – Yilwatda

Published

on

The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Professor Nentawe Yilwatda, on Monday said that the numerous projects being executed by President Bola Tinubu across the states in the southeast will give him upper hand over other presidential candidates during next year’s general elections.
Prof. Yilwatda stated this at the Abakaliki Township Stadium during a mega rally organized by the Ebonyi State government and Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, during which President Tinubu and other APC candidates for the 2027 general elections were adopted.
According to the APC National Chairman, no President had done for the southeast region what President Tinubu has done for them and expressed the confidence that the president would not only win in Ebonyi State but in the entire South East.
Prof. Yilwatda also used the occasion to address growing insinuations in some quarters that Ebonyi State had been conceded to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Dismissing the claim, Prof. Yilwatda said the state would not allow the PDP to win any position in the forthcoming general election.
“We will return President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Francis Nwifuru as Governor of Ebonyi State in 2027.
“We want to return all APC senators, members of the House of Representatives and House of Assembly candidates in 2027.
“Nobody has conceded Ebonyi to the PDP. Therefore, there is no vacancy in Ebonyi State. Ebonyi PDP has no place, and there is no vacancy at all in the Government House come 2027,” the APC National Chairman declared.
He commended the people of the state for their support for President Tinubu and urged them to re-elect him in the next presidential election in appreciation of what he has done for the state and the entire South-East through infrastructural transformation and human capital development.
Governor Francis Nwifuru, who also spoke at the event, said the state had no other presidential candidate for the 2027 general elections apart from President Tinubu.

He declared that Ebonyi remained a stronghold of the APC and vowed that the party would deliver the President in the state.

Gov. Nwifuru said President Tinubu had shown exceptional commitment to the state and deserved total support for appointing Senator Umahi as Minister of Works, a role he said Senator Umahi had performed creditably.

“Ebonyi has no other presidential candidate apart from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and we will return him in the presidential election.

“We are standing here today to tell the whole world, especially those using the President’s name to orchestrate division and confusion in this great state, that we have only one party, and that is the APC.

“This statement became necessary because some people are going around claiming they have discussed with Mr President and that he has handed Ebonyi over to the PDP. They are also saying that Chief Nyesom Wike is their leader and that Wike said the President has given Ebonyi to him.

“Ebonyi is not for sale. We are restraining ourselves because the people are with us. Nobody should push us because we have what it takes to confront anyone trying to destabilise us.

“We want to tell Mr President that he has earned our votes. He gave us what we had never had in Eastern Nigeria — the office of the Minister of Works. And this Minister of Works is not sitting idle; he is working,” he stated.

Senator Umahi, in his remarks, said President Tinubu had done what no other President had done for Ebonyi State and the entire South-East by executing numerous projects across the state and the region.

“Ebonyi State is a one-party state under Governor Francis Ogbonna Nwifuru. We are not going to repeat the mistakes of the past.

“President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has done a lot, not just for Ebonyi State but for the entire South-East and other geopolitical zones,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

Trending