Editorial
No To Operation Python Dance
The recent move by the Nigerian Army to deploy soldiers to all corners of the country to fight a wide range of criminal activities for two months under its Operation Python Dance III has raised concerns of a needlessly militarised Nigeria despite the nation’s struggle with insecurity.
Although the Army always tries to downplay the first impression the name creates to ease tension about its intentions,there is something that sounds immediately sinister about the Nigerian Army’s Operation Python Dance simply because of its code name originally derived from Exercise Egwu Eke, an Igbo phrase. The operation was first launched in the South-East region in 2016 to combat criminal activities like armed robbery and kidnapping.
The main reason why Operation Python Dance rings a very loud bell in Nigeria today is because of its very controversial aura and outing in the South- East region especially when it returned for a second time in 2017, code named Exercise Egwu Eke II or Operation Python Dance II.
The exercise which was used as a training platform for troops, gained widespread notoriety after soldiers of the Nigerian Army were involved in well-publicised clashes with members of the separatist group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), and its controversial leader, Nnamdi Kanu.
Soon after the commencement of the exercise in 2017, soldiers publicly clashed with IPOB members, with the group alleging that dozens of its members were killed in a crackdown that lasted for over a week and ended in the disappearance of Kanu before he later resurfaced in 2018.
In the course of that raid, soldiers also attacked the Abia State Council of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Umuahia, assaulted a national union officer and damaged laptops, phones and other valuables in the building.
Close to two years since Operation Python Dance II, the Army is relaunching the exercise for a third time, code named, Operation Python Dance III. This time around, it will be conducted everywhere across all the six geo-political zones in the country.
During a flag-off ceremony on Friday, December 28, 2018, the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant-General Tukur Buratai, represented by the Army’s Chief of Training and Operations, Major-General Lamidi Adeosun, announced that the exercise would run from January 1 to February 28, 2019 as a fulfilment of the Army’s mandate to conduct internal security operations in the country to combat criminality and other security challenges.
More importantly, Maj.-Gen Adeosun noted that the exercise aims to ensure that law and order are maintained as the nation approaches the 2019 general elections.
Said he: “As the build up to the 2019 general elections gathers momentum, an upsurge of security challenges stockpiling of arms by criminal groups, formation of ethnic militias and violence induced by political activities has been observed”.
The question is, why does a military training exercise aimed at combating criminal activities across the country forebodes frightening possibilities? To begin with, public trust in the Nigerian Army is characteristically low.
For instance, during a series of protests by hundreds of members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) in October, soldiers applied lethal force and opened fire on demonstrators, killing around 50 people and injuring dozens. Even though the Army only admitted to killing six while also claiming that soldiers acted with utmost responsibility, several video evidences of the clashes on social media had proved its claims to be largely false.
The Army’s conduct with those protesters and its conduct during Operation Python Dance II in the South- East and during many of its engagement with the civilian population do not exactly elicit confidence about a large-scale military operation in the country, especially during an election year.
Also, deploying troops to combat “an upsurge of security challenges”, even in parts of the country that are not troubled, begs for more convincing answers than preventing possible election-related troubles.
This is particularly puzzling since the Army has recently suffered damaging losses against terrorist group, Boko Haram, in the North-East region that has been troubled for nearly 10 years, with the group’s insurgency leaving tens of thousands dead and millions displaced.
Why is the Army broadly deploying a military operation to provide security in peaceful locations in the country when it could more properly focus attention on critical conflict zones like the North-East?
It is against this backdrop that The Tide thinks that the crux of the fears surrounding Operation Python Dance III rests squarely at the door of politics and could easily be a ploy by the ruling government to intimidate voters and rig the 2019 presidential election.
We say so because Nigeria is a democratic state and is not in a state of emergency that requires the militarisation of her electoral process.With President Muhammadu Buhari, a former military Head of State, at the helm, the military moves tend to be placed under more scrutiny than the usual; and Operation Python Dance III is one of such that should raise eyebrows.
Nigeria, as a democratic state, does not have an overwhelming security problem that should trigger a military operation on the scale of Operation Python Dance III and the fact that it covers the period of high-stakes elections already set to be contentious makes it all the more worrisome about what the motive and outcome might be. It is on that note that we say no to the exercise.
Editorial
Checkmating ‘One-Chance’ Menaces In PH
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
-
News2 days agoRSG Targets Nine Million Residents in Mosquito Net Distribution Campaign
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoAiyedatiwa Signs New Electricity Bill
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoNLNG Commissions Research And Innovation Centre In RSU
-
Maritime2 days agoMarine Minister Commends President Tinubu On NPERA Bill Assent
-
News2 days agoKenPoly Holds Eight Convocations, August 29
-
News2 days agoRSG Begins Another Phase of Projects Commissioning Today
-
News2 days agoRMAFC Completes Revenue Sharing Review, Proposes New Pay
-
Maritime2 days agoNAGAFF Petitions IGP Over Alleged Maritime Police Harassment
