Editorial
Curbing Rising Cases Of Rape
Rape, in all its ramifications, is a serious crime against man and God, as it depicts man at his most bestial level in his bid to satiate his uncontrollable libido. The incidence of rape has continued to increase, particularly in Nigeria.
Most worrisome is the fact that the female folks have increasingly become victims of vicious rape in the country, and nothing concrete appears to have been done to check the ugly trend, as most perpetrators of this heinous crime are often not brought to justice.
A recent study on rape prevalence in Nigeria carried out by the Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), and sponsored by Global Health Action indicates that rape cases in the country are on the increase by the day.
The survey also reveals that Nigeria has recorded 31.4 per cent of rape cases against females and 5.7 per cent against males; and that all these cases involve persons of both sexes within the sexually active adolescent bracket.
Similarly, police sources disclose that no week passes without reports of rape cases and that rape matters are either not reported or are under-reported, essentially due to cultural or social reasons.
Further offering an insight into the pathetic situation, a human rights group’s spokesman, Mr Evans Ufeli said despite the prevalence of rape incidents in Nigeria, only 18 convictions have so far been recorded in the country’s legal system since independence.
He posited that though the nation’s Criminal Code specifically prescribes adequate punishment for proven rape cases, victims are either frustrated by the police or the legal system-cum public prosecution.
The Tide agrees no less, because, while the law prescribes life imprisonment for rape and 14 years imprisonment for those involved in attempted rape cases, the enforcement of the law has been the greatest impediment. This is primarily because law enforcement in the country generally has been frustrating, cumbersome, tedious and unacceptable.
It is no gainsaying that lack of diligence on the part of law officers handling issues of rape has been the major reason why victims are reluctant to report their ordeal to law enforcement agencies, the International Federation of Female Lawyers (FIDA) or other relevant bodies.
This is coupled with the perceived stigma that the society attaches to such cases, a situation which invariably makes parents of rape victims shy away from also reporting such matters.
The stigma which the society often attaches to rape victims has no doubt exacerbated the increasing incidence of rape in the country.
It is, therefore, against this background that we call for proper sensitisation of the citizenry and recommend that proper diligence be applied in the handling of rape cases in the country.
Indeed, the society should not subject rape victims to psychological trauma or stigma for a crime they did not bargain for. It is most reprehensible that even minors, between the ages of two and eight years, are now victims of rape by male adults. That youngmen rape minors, mutilate their bodies and kill them for ritual purposes, leave a sour taste in the mouth.
Thus, the need to check this ugly trend has become more compelling. And it is high time stakeholders evolved ways and means of curbing the rape menace in the society. There is also the need to strengthen the country’s legal system, to check the increasing incidence of rape, and possibly insulate it from the vagaries of serial rapists. The re-orientation of the youth in this regard, with a view to returning them to the path of moral rectitude can be a starting point. The time for action is now.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
