Editorial
Compromising Security In Rivers
It is irrefragable that the primary function of the military across the globe is the defence of a country’s territorial integrity. And if the military does otherwise or abdicates this selfless but audious responsibility, it negates the very principle upon which it is established.
Perhaps, it is for this reason that Nigerians were taken aback when the Nigerian military, which had shamelessly displayed exemplary docility in its ostensibly unsuccessful war with the rag-tag but rampaging Boko Haram insurgents in the North East, recently invaded the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Orientation Camp at Nonwa Gbam in Tai Local Government Area of Rivers State to disrupt the training of the newly recruited personnel for the Rivers State Neighbourhood Safety Corps Agency.
While a bewildered nation wondered why the military, nay troops of the Nigerian Army’s 6 Division would carry out such a Hitlerite Gestapo-type operation in the sleepy, rural town of Nonwa, the Army’s Deputy Director, Public Relations, Col. Aminu Iliyasu, unsuccessfully attempted to justify the invasion. In a statement in Port Harcourt, Iliyasu claimed that troops of the 6 Division of the Nigerian Army, while on a routine surveillance at Nonwa Gbam NYSC Orientation Camp, discovered an illegal militia training camp. He further stated that the troops met over 100 recruits undergoing military training.
The Tide is shocked by the outburst of the Nigerian Army, especially against the backdrop of the fact that the Neighbourhood Safety Corps Agency is backed by parliamentary act duly enacted by the Rivers State House of Assembly. Its activities have also been well publicised in the media, over time.
The Rivers State Neighbourhood Safety Corps Agency was created to improve the security of communities in the state. And to give legal teeth to it and ensure its smooth operation, the Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike, gave his assent to the law known as the Rivers State Neighbourhood Safety Corps Law No. 8 of 2018.
In assenting to the law, the Governor had explained that the agency, which board was inaugurated on April 16, 2018, would support existing security agencies with intelligence and information for them to effectively fight crime and make the state safer for all.
At the inauguration, Wike had also charged the Board, headed by Rtd. Brigadier General Dick Ironabere, to kick-start the process of recruiting operatives for the agency. Following this directive, the agency shortly after shortlisting qualified persons, had also written to the Nigerian Army authorities seeking assistance for the trainees. In a letter titled: “Request For Drill and Physical Training Instructors”, dated November 12, 2018 and addressed to the 6 Division of the Nigerian Army (which receipt was duly acknowledged by it), the Chairman of the agency outlined the law establishing the agency, its functions and recruitment process.
The military invasion of the camp is, ipso facto, illegal, embarrassing, ill-motivated and condemnable in its entirety.
It is, indeed, strange and very unfortunate that an agency established by law to complement the efforts of the Police and other security agencies in security and intelligence gathering will be so mindlessly invaded like common criminals.
We say this because similar agencies are operating without any form of inhibition in other states of the federation like Lagos, Kwara, Kano, Imo, Enugu and Edo States. How come then that the military took exception to the establishment and operation of such agency in Rivers State?
The Tide, therefore, condemns the action of the military and urges it to steer clear of partisan politics so as not to derail efforts aimed at ensuring the smooth conduct of the 2019 general elections and, more importantly, our fledgling democracy.
We hold that the invasion of the agency’s training camp was an attempt to compromise the well-thought-out security architecture of the state government that would have contributed positively to the proper policing of the state.
We state with all intent and purposes that the security of the state should, at all times, be paramount in the agenda of every stakeholder against individual or group interest and, therefore, the Army or any other security agency is expected to synergise with the Rivers State Government to ensure adequate security of the people.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
