Editorial
Towards Hitch-Free PDP Convention
The National Convention of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) scheduled to hold in Port Harcourt tomorrow is expected to produce the party’s flagbearer for the 2019 presidential election.
From all indications, everything appears set for the epoch-making event in which 13 presidential aspirants will be vying for the party’s flagship.
Already, the Adokiye Amiesimaka Stadium, Port Harcourt, venue of the convention is bubbling with activities, as a prelude to the main event, consisting of accreditation of delegates and the election proper.
Happily enough, all the aspirants have reportedly signed an agreement in Abuja, promising to conduct themselves in an orderly manner, devoid of acrimony, rancour and bitterness before, during and after the primary election. They pledged to abide by the rules, regulations and guidelines governing the convention and in accordance with the Electoral law.
PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Kola Ologbondiyan, in a statement released in Abuja, expressed optimism that the convention would be smooth, credible, hitch-free and transparent as, according to him, all the aspirants were bound by an agreement that they would support any aspirant that will eventually emerge at the end of the electoral process.
As heart-warming as that assurance may be, Nigerians and, indeed, the international community expect nothing less from the PDP which governed the country for 16 years before handing over the baton to the All Progressives Congress (APC) on May 29, 2015.
It is expected that the PDP which prides itself as the largest political party in the African continent may have learnt its lessons from the experiences of the past.
The convention should, therefore, serve as a window and platform for the party to prove that it has come a long way and has evolved into a formidable front capable of upstaging the ruling APC which has been riddled in crises, confusion and inconclusive primaries at various levels and stages, preparatory to the 2019 general elections.
The Tide, therefore, welcomes PDP’s presidential aspirants and delegates to Port Harcourt, the Garden City of Nigeria. We strongly believe that the party’s choice of the Rivers State capital is not misplaced, as the state had previously hosted the party and other national and international gatherings.
We expect that the delegates will vote according to their conscience while the aspirants would exhibit the highest sense of maturity and responsibility in a free and conducive atmosphere, devoid of rancour and acrimony. Like sportsmen, contestants must accept the outcome of the election. Indeed, all Nigerians look up to the PDP to set the pace, as the rallying point of all the opposition political parties in the country today and a beckon of hope for a better Nigeria.
The Police, Directorate of State Services (DSS) and other security agencies should, therefore, synergise to ensure adequate security for all, before, during and after the exercise.
Luckily enough, the Governor of Delta State, Dr Ifeanyi Okowa, who doubles as the Chairman of the Convention Planning Committee has assured that all hands are on deck for a smooth, hitch-free and successful convention.
More assuring is the fact that each presidential aspirant is expected to nominate two persons who would be involved in the accreditation of delegates and the election proper. Such process would, indeed, enhance the credibility and transparency of the electoral process to achieve the desired goals.
While we join other Rivers people to heartily welcome PDP, its delegates and presidential aspirants to Rivers State, we wish the party a very successful and hitch-free convention.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
