Editorial
Nigeria And the Islamic Coalition
President Muhammadu Buhari provoked
a discourse on the secularity of Nigeria
when he expressed the willingness of Nigeria to join the coalition of Muslim Countries Against Terrorism (ISMAT). The statement was also taken with suspicion because the President had earlier, at another forum, said Nigeria would not join the coalition.
While it is very important that a leader be seen to be a man of his word or considers issues thoroughly before voicing them, the reason President Muhammadu Buhari gave as the ground to register Nigeria in the coalition of Islamic nations is also curious.
According to the President, “we are part of it because we have got terrorists in Nigeria that everybody knows who claim that they are Islamic… I have told you it is Boko Haram itself that declared loyalty to ISIS. Now ISIS is basically based in Islamic countries. If there is a coalition to fight terrorism why can’t we Nigeria be a part.”
Meanwhile, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) had in December 2015 warned against including Nigeria in the 34 member coalition. But when news of the intention came, CAN said “this singular gesture of the Buhari government betrays so much, and tends to confirm our fear that underneath everything this government is doing there is an agenda with strong Islamic undertones, aimed at undermining Nigeria’s pluralistic character and neutrality regarding government affiliation to any one religion.”
Indeed, it is not only the Christian Association of Nigeria that have raised their voices against this renewed attempt to put Nigeria under the Islamic umbrella, many Nigerians across party and religious lines have condemned the intention.
We recall that years ago under a Military Head of State, Nigeria was actually registered as a member of the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC). The furore raised was huge. Since then, the secularity of Nigeria has enjoyed the needed respect.
It is therefore curious that Nigeria would be taken through that path again. In the first place, the coalition is for Islamic countries and Nigeria is not one. The explanation that there is Boko Haram in Nigeria and that there was the need to join and fight against terrorism does not hold water.
Indeed, Nigeria has been fighting terrorism well with little or no external help. As a matter of fact, if any friendly nation wants to assist in Nigeria’s fight against terrorism, Nigeria should not be a member of its regional body as a condition. The US and other nations fighting against ISIS have not become members of ISMAT.
This whole idea is only potent with danger. It is a miscalculation that should never be allowed to crystallise. This government has only tried to directly involve Nigeria in the fight against ISIS when we have not been able to handle Boko Haram locally. Is Nigeria truly prepared to face ISIS?
Our government cannot pretend not to know that ISMAT is a creation of Saudi Arabia to check the growing rascality of Iran. In fact, it is the pivot on which the killings between the Sunni and Shiite Islamic sects revolve. By extension Nigeria may inadvertently be creating the threatre for the sects to clash in Nigeria.
Besides, the suggestion has already provoked religious concerns in Nigeria, and this can be avoided. Nigeria is already inundated with too many political, ethnic, economic and social conflicts. This Islamic issue simply adds to the many problems that threaten the unity of Nigeria.
That is why the National Assembly should act fast and abort this plan to make Nigeria an Islamic country, albeit through the back door. Issues like this are not what one person should decide for a country. The time of military fiat is over and must be so seen.
This is one subject Nigeria can safely walk away from and no one will suffer any loss. No matter the attraction to ISMAT, it will be nothing compared to the peace and unity of Nigeria. Incidentally, a number of Muslims who this action tries to gratify also think that Nigeria should not open too many doors for conflict.
The Tide fully endorses the sentiments of the Christian Association of Nigeria, which clearly accords with the wishes of a greater number of the people. It will be in the interest of all if Nigeria will let the sleeping dog lie.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics2 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
