Editorial
Buhari And Electoral Promises
The fear about President Muhammadu
Buhari’s age and his ability to govern a
complex country like Nigeria again dominated public discourse, recently. The fear was, however, fuelled by the president’s own admission that his age might take a toll on his performance.
President Buhari, while addressing Nigerians resident in South Africa said, “I wished I became the Head of State when I was a governor, just a few years as a young man. Now at 72, there is a limit to what I can do.” Since then, the president’s statement had been subjected to many interpretations, many of whom see the statement as an admission that Buhari was too old to cope with the demands of his office.
Although the president’s media aide, Femi Adesina, immediately came to his rescue by offering clarifications and assurances to the effect that Buhari would fulfil all his electoral promises, the assurances have not totally assuaged the feelings and fears of many Nigerians who had placed so much hope on the president.
While we commend Buhari for his honesty and frankness, we note that his statement has nevertheless deflated the ballons of enthusiasm and expectations of many Nigerians in his government. In truth, it is too early for the president to make such statement in view of the big issue his political opponents made of his age and ability to withstand the pressure of his office during the campaigns.
The Tide, has no doubt in the ability of the president to deliver on his electoral promises given his well known pedigree as a principled, honest and unrepentant nationalist and anti-corruption crusader who rode to power on popular mandate and the mantra of change, Buhari, should expect high expectations from Nigerians. And such expectations usually come with impatience.
The Buhari government is bequeathed with a myriad of problems by the previous administrations to with insecurity, corruption, epileptic power supply, infrastructural decay and general economic downturn. But it behoves the president to swing into action, without further delay, by tackling these problems in line with his electoral promises.
While we appreciate that the thirst for change cannot be assuaged overnight, Nigerians will want to wake up every morning to see actions from the new government.
Although barely one month into the life of Buhari’s administration is not enough to assess his performance, his inability to name key officers of his administration such as the Secretary to the Federal Government, Chief of Staff and Ministers after a month after he took oath of office leaves much to be desired.
As a former Military Governor, Head of State and Executive Chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), with a strong moral strength and single-mindedness, Buhari was expected to have hit the ground running by constituting his cabinet the moment he assumed office.
We, therefore, urge President Buhari to rise above the perennial tardiness, drudgery and sloppiness of which his Predecessors were accused. The new government should get its acts together and devise measures to fix Nigeria back to its rigatful position. And it is now time to engage the speed gear.
Buhari has a mandate to renew Nigeria and to be the architect of national renaissance in spite of his age. Like the presidents media aide said in defence of his principal: “old wine tastes better”, we want to believe that Buhari is good win-e that gets better with age. After all, old age, they say, comes with wisdom.
If America’s Ronald Reagan at 73 and South Africa’s Nelson Mandela at old age can be counted among the best and most outstanding presidents of their respective countries, why not Nigeria’s Buhari at 72?
President Buhari and his party – the All Progressives Congress (APC), promised Nigerians a change for better, and it was that change they voted for. Nigerians, therefore, do not deserve anything less than positive change from Buhari and his party. No excuses will be acceptable for non-performance.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
