Opinion
Common Trends In Christianity
The technological advancement in its wake has a great
deal of influence on Christianity. The more scientific-oriented and educated the world becomes, the more it gets estranged from God. It is not unusual to hear people say that their Christianity is in their hearts. As such, they have the form of godliness but deny the power thereof.
The contemporary Christian is in a dilemma of choosing between old time and modern time Christianity. The argument is that classification of Christianity creates room for choice and it stratifies Christianity into class system which was lamented by Karl Mar, the socialist.
The modern Christians, from their behaviour, seems to be of the opinion that the commandments of God are not to be obeyed strictly by the educated, the accomplished and the wealthy in the society. To the modern Christians, old time or classical Christianity seems to denote the traditional, outdated, out of fashion, primitive and old Christian living. So, when a Christian is modest in dressing, soft spoken, gentle, wears a natural look, refuses to cheat in exams, shun immoral relationship, and rejects all other unscriptural behaviours, he is referred to as a classical or an old time Christian.
On the contrary, when a Christian wears a trendy hair-do, clad in a global designer’s wear, boisterous and outspoken, cheats in exams, have immoral relationships and indulges in sin, he is a modern Christian. The basis for this classification is deduced from their behaviour. There is also the argument that once a person raises up his hands for altar call, his name is forthwith written in the book of life, and that God is a loving father, He cannot write a person’s name in the book of life and erase it. Moreover that the Omniscience of God makes it possible for Him to avoid writing the names of those who will eventually be lost in the book of life. So, since the names of Christians are undeniably written in the book of life, even if they sin, God cannot cast them away because they will surely repent. Another name for this argument is eternal security.
The above argument gets the people confused as to which way to follow. In fact, there are modern churches which back up these arguments with high level praise worship, messages that revolve round prosperity and God’s love. For these modern churches, they do not want to make people sad with their messages, because in the presence of God, there is liberty and fullness of joy.
They don’t preach against sin, although altar calls are always made to launch people into the realm of excellence and prosperity. But there is no need to be confused because the word of God cannot be broken. Exodus 32:33 states: “And God said unto Moses, whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book”. Ezekiel 3:20 reaffirms categorically saying: “Again, when a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die …”. Rev. 22:18 states that “… if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book”. These scriptures in quote, are targeted at the born-again Christians who indulge in sin including ministers, pastors, overseers and Christians who refuse to preach against sin because they dread making people sad. They will have their lot in damnation according to Revelation 21:20.
The broad and liberal theology being pushed today is a modern plague that can’t even comfort those who preach it. We have too many false prophets in the pulpit who are clever deceivers. They try to absolve sin by painting it all over with a gray brush. To them nobody is right and nobody is wrong. Everybody is going to be saved; God loves everybody; sin is just inhospitality or hatred toward your fellow man.
But these same “sin silencers” share with all sinners the same inner gnawing, the same sense of guilt and corruption. They leave the loneliness, emptiness and despair out of their calculations. They can try to make a sinner comfortable with his sin, but they can’t provide him with lasting rest and peace. They can’t quiet the deep inner voice that cries, “in spite of it all, you are still guilty”.
The modern church with its kitchen and parlor, with its club and gymnasium, and with its ministries to the flesh and to the world is both suggestive and alarming.
The original church is faithfully spiritual. The original church is not entangled with the wild and noisy music with the dances which foster desires or inclinations which are not spiritual and did not minister to the soul’s progress.
We might as well add to the list of heavenly helpers, the skating rink, calisthenics and the gymnasium. People are allowed to club, enjoy social gathering or play parlor games with the deception which degrade holiness by calling and making these things the rightful and easiest approaches for evangelism that feed the spiritual lives of the people.
Please, suffice it to say that Christianity is not religion, neither a play of religion but the life of Christ miraculously produced in the whole being of an individual and that ecumenism may lead to compromise if the strange fire (s) are not extinguished completely from the worship and or services for God.
So, the path left for a sincere seeker is to repent of every known sin, refuse every form of watered down gospel clad in disguise of prosperity messages and dissociate from worshippers having itching ears to the true gospel (2 Timothy 4: 3, 4).
Consequently, sincere seekers must receive hard core sound messages on Bible doctrines and God’s commandments, reaffirm the word by preaching it “… be instant in season, out of season, reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine” (2 Timothy 2:2).
Apart from receiving sound gospel, those who worship God in spirit and in truth should resist false doctrines and all their propellers. Make sure they live the risen life, having holiness of life as an armour. Sincere seekers should not forget to read and meditate on God’s word. Remember that your spending eternity with God in heave is conditional” if you continue in the faith … (Colossian 1: 23.)
In conclusion, it is better for you to obey God’s word absolutely without reservation, ignoring the human classification because it is the word of God that will matter in the end. I wish you safe journey to heaven as you follow the scriptural pilgrims pathway.
Derefaka writes from Port Harcourt.
Tamunoseimieibi Derefaka
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics2 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics2 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
