Editorial
Census Put-Off: Thumbs Up For FG
The Population and Housing Census, which was initially scheduled for May 3–7, 2023, has been post-
poned indefinitely by President Muhammadu Buhari, following deliberations with select Ministers and Nasir Isa-Kwarra, Chairman of the National Population Commission (NPC). The resolve to delay the headcount was taken to stem prevailing circumstances that indicated an impending national crisis. This decision has transferred the responsibility to the President’s successor, hence, averting a potentially disastrous situation.
Despite the unwavering commitment of the NPC to execute the national project, it became apparent that both the agency and the relevant government bodies, as well as the citizens, were ill-prepared. It is a clear sign of astuteness for President Buhari to have thought it wise to avoid the risk of escalating this already precarious situation.
A new census for development planning was declared by Buhari, who asserted that the nation needed an updated one, given that the previous one took place 17 years ago in 2006. Nonetheless, the President did not specifically reference any potential hurdles that may be encountered in this undertaking. It is anticipated that the NPC will assume responsibility for this task.
In the editorial of this newspaper dated July 20, 2022, it was observed that the scheduled census for April 2023 was poorly timed owing to its proximity to the general election and the prevailing security challenges in the country. The census result could be negatively affected by various situations. Even the NPC’s pre-census tests were hindered in certain areas as a result of safety concerns in some states.
We had stated that if the current administration failed to conduct the census exercise at least a year before the end of their tenure, there would be no justification for rushing to conduct it just two months before their exit. As predicted, the postponement of the census and the reasons given have proven our argument to be correct.
Similarly, many stakeholders criticised the scheduled May date and urged for its delay because of poor timing. The decision to hold both nationwide elections and the census in an election year, with the challenges posed by their conduct and outcomes in the country, was deemed as notably imprudent. The Buhari’s administration has been berated for its apparent preoccupation with carrying out certain tasks instead of delegating them to the succeeding government.
The proposal has failed to garner inspiration among the Nigerian populace, given the plethora of intricate issues that surround it. The post-general election aftermath has thrown the country into a state of disarray, with stakeholders raising grave concerns about the conduct and outcome of the presidential, governorship, National Assembly and State Assembly elections.
Nigerians are still ruing their losses from the cash crunch that prevented them from accessing their money, causing widespread suffering. The police are struggling to contain the resulting unrest, and all law enforcement agencies are overwhelmed in their efforts to combat criminal activity, including insurgency, terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, armed robbery, cultism, and other crimes.
Many Nigerians across the country face daily attacks, eventuating in deaths, injuries, and kidnappings. These crimes are often motivated by purely criminal motives, leaving victims entirely on their own. The police are overburdened and often choose to ignore these incidents, only intervening when a high-profile individual is involved. This leaves some Nigerians at the mercy of their criminal abductors, relying solely on their relatives to assuage the situation.
Therefore, the NPC’s initial insistence on conducting a census during this period was over-ambitious and laid the foundation for another controversial headcount. Shoddy preparation typically leads to shoddy outcomes, as Nigerians have seen in past national assignments. It was clear that the commission was planning to fail.
For a successful national census, adequate preparation is crucial to ensure desired results and minimal hitches. The politicisation of the headcount has made it one of the thorniest issues in the country. However, if properly executed, the exercise can correct previous mistakes and provide a reliable population figure. A convivial environment must be created to achieve this.
Conducting a credible census requires total buy-in from all segments of the country. It should be a collaborative national assignment with the federal, the 36 states, and the 774 local government areas. Massive publicity and awareness campaigns from the grassroots upwards are required to ensure the success of the census. The NPC should return to the drawing board to guarantee that all obligatory steps are taken to achieve a credible headcount.
The task at hand poses seminal challenges. The expanse of the country’s road network is vast, with only a third of it being paved. The unpaved roads are prone to flooding, deterioration, and drought, making it arduous for census officials to reach all regions of the country promptly. Meticulous planning is necessary to overcome the major obstacles of funding and logistics.
The funding for the initiative needs to be properly addressed since the government’s proposal to establish a collective fund under the auspices of the United Nations Population Fund has encountered setbacks. Out of the N869 billion budgeted, only N291.5 billion has been disbursed, while another N327.2 billion approved has not yet been transferred to the NPC.
Buhari’s decision to postpone the headcount was judicious. It is incumbent upon the President-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to schedule a new date and implement measures to improve the process. The forthcoming count should be technology-driven, accurate, and reliable to gain the support of Nigerians.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
