Editorial
Ikoyi Tragedy: One Building Collapse, Too Many
The utter collapse of a 21-storey building in the Ikoyi area of Lagos, Nigeria, once again raises the question of ratification, supervision, and regulation of the Nigerian building industry. It is cliché to detail such events when they take place, as they have become more and more frequent. Although the society can indict the proprietor of the project, the consultant or the contractor, there is more than can be imagined.
The Ikoyi incident is an immense tragedy in our country. No fewer than 45 people, including the property owner, were certified dead and several were maimed in the gruesome accident that trapped workers and guests to the site. Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu expressed his discontent and again demanded an investigation into the episode. While we await the outcome of the fact-finding panel, we denounce the constant crash of buildings in the country, in which Lagos has become renowned.
Between 2011 and 2019, there were 88 building collapses in Nigeria, but only 21 occurred outside Lagos. This is particularly disconcerting! The Ikoyi tragedy dominated the event of a two-storey house that failed on the same day, November 1, in the Lekki area. The building was likewise under construction and gave way after the storm that night.
Earlier, the Lagos State Building Control Agency (LASBCA) had confirmed the partial collapse of a three-floor structure in Aguda, Surulere area on October 25, 2021, which was ascribed to the misdeed of the property owner. The General Manager of the LASBCA, Gbolahan Oki, acknowledged that the owner had carried out illegal renovations and added attachments to the building without recourse to the agency.
In July 2021, a three-storey building on Church Street on Lagos Island partially collapsed at night as residents were asleep. LASBCA stated that the structural deficiency of part of the water tank beam caused the incident. In the same month, a two-storey building being raised in Isawo community in Ikorodu described as an attachment, crumbled and killed the owner.
Given these developments and others in the area, it is imperative to explore the periodic collapse of buildings in Lagos, the nation’s economic hub. That they have traced virtually all cases to process abuse and the application of lower quality materials indicates that incompetence has become ubiquitous in the sector. Intentional neglect and conspiracy with regulatory authorities cannot be ignored as well.
Shortly after the catastrophe of the Ikoyi building, a letter from a consulting firm that first worked on the skyscraper, Prowess Engineering Limited, came to light. The memo, dated 20th February, 2020, and delivered to the estate development company, Fourscore Heights Limited, exonerated itself from any consequences that might ensue from what the builder was executing outside the recommended procedures. Though the letter does not stipulate what transpired between both firms, the observations of the engineering firm are valid pointers to the cause of the disaster.
Prowess’ charge that the owner of the shattered building extended beyond authorised limits and had even utilised “inferior and terrible” materials in the construction with no feedback from the authorities, is a considerable indictment of the Lagos State Government. The state-owned regulators cannot justly claim to have been unaware of what was going on at the site.
We recall the monstrous building collapse at The Synagogue Church of All Nations on September 12, 2014. That catastrophe killed 116 people, and the ensuing mess of revelations is a painful resurgence of the one in Ikoyi. While an inquest by the coroner charged the church and its engineers with “criminal negligence” and recommended them for prosecution, little came of it. Not only did those involved get away with the blood on their hands, but some religious bigots further aided to advance the plot that the collapse was an assault on the church’s pastor.
Following serial failures to bring to book such infractions, building collapse has become mundane. The crash of buildings in Lagos State today is a conspiracy among corrupt state agencies. The unethical abandonment of supervisory functions by these agencies is associated with the alienation of some construction staff. Both legitimise their treachery through greedy publicists and social media influencers that help spread a lie.
Firms like Prowess Engineering should be applauded and handed over the job to report to regulatory agencies, clients who choose to overreach themselves and hence, endanger public safety. It is conceivable that, in these situations, reporting to the authority may be ineffective because of political considerations in how the state approaches such offences. And if the authorities cannot override individual concerns, an autonomous body should receive such apprehensions on behalf of all.
Oki’s suspension by Sanwo-Olu was reassuring because it meant there would be repercussions. But by the time Lagos State Deputy Governor, Obafemi Hamzat, visited the site and expressed some self-vindication on behalf of the builders, it was no longer as certain that heads would roll. According to him, the building was closed for four months last year because they noticed certain deviations, nevertheless later reopened.
Hamzat said the builders “were making corrective actions when this took place” and “at the time this happened, they were not really constructing.” His making justifications for the builders, when a proper investigation had yet been conducted, is not heartening. Are these government officials ready to deal with the mass degeneration of Lagos’ urban planning, or will they continue on the path of self-defence and concealment?
It must be noted that every collapse of a building has substantial impacts that no one can conveniently forget. The effects are mostly in economic and social terms. These include loss of human lives, injuries, economic waste concerning loss of properties, investments, jobs, incomes, loss of trust, dignity, and acceleration of troubles among the stakeholders and environmental calamity.
Lagos is a municipality that is required to have a plethora of towering buildings to accommodate its overflowing population, but that cannot be accomplished if the buildings collapse at will. The Ikoyi incident should serve as an opportunity to affirm a rule of “non-compromise.” One way to do this is to prosecute anyone who cannot carry out his or her obligations. Until those who undermine industry standards are prosecuted and jailed, there can be no breakthrough on that front.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
